「each」の検索結果

Add project-specific rules and conventions to the configured RULES.md artifact. Each invocation appends new rules. These rules are automatically loaded by $aif-implement before execution. Use when user says "add rule", "remember this", "convention", or "always do X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix silent incorrect results in RFDB Datalog queries that share a variable between two edge atoms on opposite ends (e.g. self-join patterns like `edge(M, C, "T1"), edge(C, M, "T2")`). Use when: (1) a Datalog rule returns rows that look structurally wrong (e.g. a self-loop rule reports hits but pinning M to each reported id refutes the edge existence), (2) Cypher `MATCH (m)-[:R1]->(c)-[:R2]->(m)` returns the same bogus rows (engine-level bug, not Datalog-specific), (3) results change when you bind one variable explicitly vs. leave it free. Root cause: hash- join fast path in `eval_edge_hash_join` / `eval_incoming_hash_join` unconditionally rebinds the non-key Term::Var without checking whether the variable is already bound in the current row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for achieving 100% backward dataflow reachability in a new language. Create gauntlet fixture, write trace, diagnose gaps, fix analyzer/algorithm, iterate to 100%. Language-agnostic process. Use when: (1) adding a new language to Grafema, (2) auditing dataflow coverage for existing language, (3) user says "/dataflow-gauntlet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute a unified outer hull around a group of hex tiles that includes multiple disconnected sub-clusters separated by 1-tile gaps. Use when: (1) rendering nested hierarchy hulls (e.g. "package" hull wrapping multiple "sub-region" hex islands), (2) the naive boundary trace outlines each island separately instead of as one bag, (3) flood-fill from outside walks THROUGH the 1-hex gaps and marks them exterior, (4) heuristic "non-adjacent same-group neighbours" over-fills L-shape concavities, (5) axial-only opposite-pair filling misses non-axial bridges between islands. Solution: morphological close (dilate + erode) on the hex grid — fills exactly the interior 1-hex gaps without affecting exterior corners, then trace boundary on the closed shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix scattered/torn regions in hex-grid simulated annealing layouts that use "competitive flood-fill" (one tile per region per outer iteration). Use when: (1) regions of >20 tiles end up dispersed instead of forming compact blobs, (2) maxDist/sqrt(N) dispersion ratio is 10×+ worse than the ideal compact blob, (3) tiles assigned to one region show up in multiple disconnected fragments across the layout, (4) the visualization has a "trypophobia ring" pattern at the perimeter where some regions spill into a perimeter spiral, (5) an overflow spiral fallback exists in the layout code and frequently kicks in for large regions, (6) bigger regions look worse than smaller ones (small regions stay compact, big ones shred). Root cause: interleaved competitive flood-fill (round-robin one tile at a time across all regions) lets large regions get boxed in by neighbors before they finish growing — the unfilled remainder is dumped into the overflow spiral at the perimeter, far from the seed. Fix: replace with sequential region-by-region BFS — process regions in size-descending order, fully claim each region's N contiguous tiles before moving to the next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix nodes silently disappearing from RFDB when an enricher or post-resolution pass writes new nodes via BatchHandle. Use when: (1) writing a TypeScript enricher that should ADD nodes/edges to existing files, (2) after calling `client.createBatch()` + `batch.addNode({file: 'X', ...})` + `batch.commit()` the original nodes in file X have vanished, (3) tests that load a graph fixture, run an enricher, then query original nodes get empty results, (4) a verification step shows expected nodes pre-enrichment but 0 post-enrichment. Root cause: `BatchHandle.commit()` invokes RFDB's `commit_batch` which AUTO-POPULATES `changed_files` from each added node's `file` field, then the server DELETES all existing nodes whose `file` matches before inserting new ones — file-level upsert semantics. This is correct for the JS/Haskell analyzers (which fully re-emit a file's contents) but catastrophic for enrichers that only ADD to existing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "minimize the repro path", "/minimize", "shrink the crash steps", "精简复现路径", "找最小复现", "把 12 步压成 3 步", or wants to compress a recorded crash repro_path into the shortest sequence that still reproduces the same crash signature. Drives live Android replay via mobile-mcp + ui-mcp + log-mcp, validates each candidate subset with analyzer-mcp's signature, and updates the session's crash record with the verified minimal path; iOS sessions use the static fallback because ui-mcp replay is Android-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Work (MSW) principle through the MSW Kernel to scope, execute, verify, and stop agent work. State the requested outcome and smallest proof, admit a claim only when deleting it would leave the contract unmet or unproven, do and prove each necessary claim, and halt at the fixed point. Use for implementation, debugging, review, research, planning, documentation, or any task where scope control, proportional evidence, or avoiding overwork matters. Also use when the user says MSW, Minimum Sufficient Work, do only what is necessary, avoid over-engineering, or stop when the result is proven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize ChatGPT Voice in the Codex desktop app into an ear-first control plane for free-form task coordination and opt-in workflows. Apply spoken synthesis, routing-only coordination, owning-task role contracts, project placement, explicit authority, safe speech, current-state verification, honest recovery, and the optional Slopware Dev Stack: MSL, MSW, CODER Loop, and Timebox. Load named workflows only when invoked: Freeway for parallel lanes, Decision Walkthrough for read-only authority convergence, and Tutorial for teaching-first onboarding. Use when the user invokes the voice optimizer, coordinates Codex work through voice, assigns the current voice task as coordinator, runs Freeway, starts a decision walkthrough, learns voice orchestration, routes development through CODER, authorizes Timebox, or asks CVO to install or use Slopware companions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for ANY bug bounty, penetration test, or web/API/mobile security assessment: recon, testing endpoints, analyzing Burp traffic or any bug-bounty platform's MCP (HackerOne, Intigriti, Bugcrowd, YesWeHack, Immunefi), reviewing APKs, bypassing a WAF, enforcing scope, hunting a specific vuln class, validating findings, writing reports, or when you are stuck on a target and about to give up. Activates automatically for all bug-bounty and pentest sessions. Runs an autonomous, never-surrender predator methodology: refuses to conclude "secure", exhausts each vuln class to depth, proves a real attacker-path with impact and no false positives, tracks coverage so nothing is re-tested or skipped, diagnoses failed tooling from full logs, and hunts at maximum effort with intelligent token use until the goal is found. Activates and follows instructions in ANY language the operator writes in (the skill itself is English). Bundles a per-class web-exploitation KB, a writeup library, and PayloadsAllTheThings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add project-specific rules and conventions to the configured RULES.md artifact. Each invocation appends new rules. These rules are automatically loaded by $aif-implement before execution. Use when user says "add rule", "remember this", "convention", or "always do X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill books, documents, folders, or URLs into compact, practical Agent Skills. Use when source material should become either one reusable skill package or a split set of focused skills, each with a concise SKILL.md plus detailed references and examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add project-specific rules and conventions to the configured RULES.md artifact. Each invocation appends new rules. These rules are automatically loaded by /aif-implement before execution. Use when user says "add rule", "remember this", "convention", or "always do X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a strict multi-iteration Reflex Loop with phases (PLAN, PRODUCE||PREPARE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, REFINE) to improve an artifact until quality gates pass or iteration limits are reached. Use when user asks for iterative refinement, quality-gated generation, or "generate -> critique -> refine" loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye plan review — interactive, like CEO and Eng review. Rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what would make it a 10, then fixes the plan to get there. Works in plan mode. For live site visual audits, use /design-review. Use when asked to "review the design plan" or "design critique".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a PhD applicant's profile and rank candidate advisors using a connection-first 4.0-scale scoring system. Best-supported for physics / HEP and materials science (MSE), with the scoring engine extensible to chemistry, biology, CS, math, EE, ChemE, earth science (each with field-specific caveats — see references/journal_tiers.md). Use when the user wants to evaluate their PhD application chances, find matching advisors at top US programs, score a CV for graduate school, or compare candidate professors. Also triggers when the user mentions phdtaketaketake or its connection-first philosophy of valuing advisor network over h-index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Slice a NowStack Mobile app's .agents/plan/PRD.md + .agents/plan/ARCHITECTURE.md into well-scoped, implementable task files under .agents/plan/tasks/, each an autonomous 1–3h vertical slice (Convex schema/function → Expo screen → wiring) with success criteria, dependencies, and verification commands. Use for "create tasks", "ns tasks", "break this into tickets", or as the third planning step after ns-prd and ns-architecture. Both docs must exist first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect every external account NowStack Mobile needs (Convex, Expo/EAS, Apple Developer, Vercel, Stripe, Google Play) by acquiring PROGRAMMATIC API ACCESS for each, then doing everything automatically through that access. Use for "setup accounts", "connect my accounts", first-run onboarding, or when check-setup reports CLI/auth gaps. The skill obtains a token/key per service, stores it in the right place, and only asks the user for the irreducible manual steps (browser signup, 2FA, one-time key download). Every account is skippable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investment Thesis Generator — complete institutional-quality thesis with bull/bear cases (3-5 reasons each with evidence), catalyst timeline, entry/exit strategy with specific price levels, position sizing tables, timeframe classification, and asymmetry assessment. Triggered by "trade thesis <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。