「structured」の検索結果

Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured communication templates for malware incidents including stakeholder notifications, executive briefings, technical advisories, and regulatory disclosures with severity-based escalation procedures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and catalog attack patterns from cyber threat intelligence reports into a structured STIX-based library mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for detection engineering and threat-informed defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms. Activates for requests involving IR playbook creation, incident response procedure documentation, response runbook development, or SOAR playbook design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize AEM Edge Delivery Services commerce product pages for search engine crawling and indexing. Audits client-side rendered product content for crawlability, validates meta tags, Product schema.org structured data, canonical URLs, and image optimization. Addresses the core challenge that EDS product pages render catalog data via JavaScript, which search crawlers may not fully execute. Use when product pages are not appearing in search results or have poor search visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import a single webpage from any URL into canonical EDS block format — structured HTML that authors edit in DA. Scrapes the page, analyzes structure, maps to existing blocks, and generates HTML for immediate local preview. Also triggered by terms like "migrate", "migration", or "migrating". Use this when the goal is canonical EDS authoring; use the snowflake skill instead when the user wants to preserve the original DOM byte-for-byte (static-to-EDS overlay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured HTML from authoring analysis for AEM Edge Delivery Services. Creates section structure, applies block tables, handles metadata, and manages images folder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes development requirements and generates structured acceptance criteria for AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS) tasks. Use when the user needs to define acceptance criteria, write requirements, scope work, or create a definition of done for EDS blocks, components, variants, bug fixes, or styling changes. Produces task breakdowns, identifies edge cases, and documents analysis for new blocks, variants, behavior modifications, CSS-only changes, and bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve search engine visibility with proper meta tags, structured data, sitemaps, and semantic HTML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines raw ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking for ordinary non-command brainstorming, idea shaping, options comparison, and explicit IDEATE deepening routed by `aili-delivery-flow`; do not use as the top-level `/ideate` command owner or for existing-plan stress-test, review, or completion-claim checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements comprehensive observability with OpenTelemetry tracing, Prometheus metrics, and structured logging. Includes instrumentation plans, sample dashboards, and alert candidates. Use for "observability", "monitoring", "tracing", or "metrics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates consistent error handling with custom error classes, HTTP status mapping, structured logging, safe client messages, and error taxonomy. Use when standardizing "error handling", "logging", "error responses", or "exception management".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wi-Fi reconnaissance methodology — adapter selection, monitor mode and packet injection setup, regulatory domain handling, multi-band airspace mapping, hidden SSID discovery, BSSID/ESSID/channel/PMF/encryption fingerprinting, client probe analysis, vendor OUI lookup, war-driving with Kismet/airodump-ng/Wigle, and structured airspace data capture for downstream attacks. Use at the start of any wireless engagement to build the target map before active attacks; covers 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz (Wi-Fi 6E) bands and adapter compatibility for each.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured OSINT methodology framework: target definition, source selection, collection workflows, data correlation, timeline reconstruction, and reporting. Use to guide systematic OSINT campaigns or teach OSINT methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Week 2 of the exploit development curriculum. Covers fuzzing methodology: target selection, corpus generation, coverage-guided fuzzing with AFL++/libFuzzer, structured fuzzing, and triage/deduplication. Use when setting up fuzz campaigns, selecting harness strategies, or triaging fuzzer output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web or X/Twitter using xAI Grok server-side tools (web_search, x_search) via the xAI Responses API. Use when you need tweets/threads/users from X, want Grok as an alternative to Brave, or you need structured JSON + citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web search and scraping via Firecrawl API. Use when you need to search the web, scrape websites (including JS-heavy pages), crawl entire sites, or extract structured data from web pages. Requires FIRECRAWL_API_KEY environment variable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert raw notes, error logs, voice dictation, or screenshots into crisp GitHub-flavored markdown issue reports. Use when the user pastes bug info, error messages, or informal descriptions and wants a structured GitHub issue. Supports images/GIFs for visual evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision tree analysis for complex decision-making across all domains. Use when user needs to evaluate multiple options with uncertain outcomes, assess risk/reward scenarios, or structure choices systematically. Applicable to business, investment, personal decisions, operations, career choices, product strategy, and any situation requiring structured evaluation. Triggers include decision tree, should I, what if, evaluate options, compare alternatives, risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。