3,674 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /claude-setup:build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to download paper PDFs by DOI(s). Triggers: "下载这个/这几个 DOI的 PDF/全文", "把这个 DOI 列表全部下下来", "批量下 dois.txt", "download paper(s) for DOI(s) …", "bulk-download from this Web of Science / WoS savedrecs export". Routes each DOI through publisher TDM APIs (Wiley/Elsevier/Springer) then OA fallbacks (OpenAlex/Crossref/Unpaywall), and — when --use-browser-fallback is set — a final Playwright pass that reuses institutional cookies for ACS/RSC/IEEE/AIP/IOP/APS/Science. DO NOT use for paper *search* (use Semantic Scholar / arXiv instead), Zotero import / metadata sync, or downloading *all references of* a single paper (use the ref-downloader skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work with the @upstash/blob TypeScript/JavaScript SDK for S3-compatible object storage with direct browser uploads, presigned URLs, multipart, and signed reads. Use when storing files or blobs, uploading avatars, images, videos, attachments or user documents, letting a browser upload straight to storage without proxying bytes through a server, generating public or time-limited signed URLs, serving private files, streaming large files with pause and resume, setting cache headers on stored objects, or reaching an S3-compatible bucket from the AWS SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert PDF presentations to HTML slide templates using a visual reproduction approach. Pipeline: PDF → slide screenshots → Claude writes HTML matching each screenshot. Use when the user wants to convert a PDF to HTML slide templates, reproduce a presentation as HTML, or create reusable templates from existing decks. Triggers: 'pdf to html', 'convert pdf to template', 'reproduce this deck as html', 'create template from pdf'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when developing in packages/agent-core-v2 (the DI × Scope agent engine) — adding or modifying a domain Service, choosing a LifecycleScope, wiring DI dependencies, splitting a domain across scopes, owning or migrating a config section, gating behavior behind an experimental flag, raising coded errors, working on the permission system, writing DI/Scope tests, porting business logic from agent-core (v1) to v2, triaging a main-branch commit against v2, or exposing a v2 domain over server-v2 while keeping the /api/v1 wire contract compatible with released clients. Self-contained guide organized by development stage (orient → design → implement → test → verify) plus align workflows for v1→v2 migration, main-branch commit triage, and server-v2 wire exposure; each file carries the rules, examples, and red lines for its step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or updating a pull request in this repository — how to fill in each section of the PR template with concise, reviewer-friendly content, including the behavior-change table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, change or cancel a prompt that runs on a schedule, in whatever language the user asks. Use when the user says things like "every weekday at 8:30", "în fiecare zi lucrătoare la 8:30", "each morning", "remind me at noon", or wants to reschedule, edit or stop a scheduled task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch the team's shared skills — reset each disposable team clone to origin/main — and show the outcome per team as a Markdown board from the terum-skills CLI. Use when the user wants the newest catalogue, receipts or roster before listing, searching or installing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Leads with narrative paragraphs and reaches for lists, tables, and diagrams when content is genuinely structured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inventory all founder resources across 8 categories for a one-person company. Use when Codex needs to systematically confirm what resources the founder has — experience, network, skills, relationships, channels, assets, time/money constraints, hard limits — by first doing a broad scan of each category, then drilling into specifics (distribution, usable portions, how to use, cost of use), and producing a confirmed detailed resource inventory written to `opc-doc/`. Does NOT analyze directions, preferences, suitability, or risk tolerance — those belong to downstream skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a conversion loop for a one-person company from reach to lead capture to purchase. Use when Codex needs to explain conversion concepts when needed, verify MVP prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple conversion-path options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches you how to break large tasks into stages, save your place between sessions, and recover smoothly when a task gets interrupted. Use when planning a multi-day project, for breaking down large work into manageable stages, during recovery from an interrupted session, when managing complex ongoing work, or when the user says "cowork stopped in the middle", "token limit", "task too large", "context management", "how to do big tasks", "session got cut off", "cowork forgot what we were doing", "how do I work on something over multiple days", "it lost track of the project", or "my task is too big for one session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teaches you how to delegate tasks to Cowork so clearly that you get exactly what you asked for — every time. Use when learning how to give better instructions, for improving your delegation technique, during early Cowork adoption when results feel off, when writing clearer task descriptions, or when the user says "how do I ask cowork to do things", "delegation tips", "better instructions", "cowork isn't doing what I want", "help me delegate", "my results are bad", "how do I give better prompts", "cowork keeps getting it wrong", "I don't know how to use this", or "how do I get good results".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits your Cowork setup across five categories, scores each one, and gives you a prioritized improvement plan. For reviewing how well you are using Cowork, when optimizing your workspace configuration, or during a quarterly productivity review. Use when the user says "health check", "am I using cowork right", "optimize my setup", "cowork audit", "what am I missing", "is my setup good", or "how do I get more out of cowork".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A 15-minute guided setup that teaches Cowork who you are, how you work, and what tools you use — so every result feels tailored instead of generic. Use when setting up Cowork for the first time, for personalizing your workspace preferences, during onboarding after your first session, when configuring your tools and context, or when the user says "set up cowork", "configure cowork", "why is cowork giving me generic results", "cowork setup", "personalize cowork", "make cowork know me", "cowork feels like chatgpt", or "how do I get better results from cowork".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when evaluating VCSDD grading dimensions during adversarial review. Provides concrete evaluation checklists for each of the 5 dimensions and convergence signal detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "who are our customers?" / "how do we tailor for X stakeholder?" / "who should this report go to?", or wants to map / re-map stakeholder needs. Ensures intelligence reaches the right people in the right format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about carding, BIN attacks, payment-card breach markets, fullz/CVV2 trade, autoshops (BidenCash, Brian's Club, Russianmarket, B1ack's Stash), or financial-fraud TTPs. Self-updating knowledge cell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。