2,750 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Optimize a measured performance problem when the user names a latency/load/Core Web Vitals/resource target or current profiling evidence identifies a bottleneck; do not trigger from generic implementation, review, or an unsupported suspicion that code may be slow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates response procedures for security incidents with containment steps, communication templates, and evidence collection. Use for "incident response", "security playbook", "breach response", or "IR plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before a tag, GitHub release, or Zenodo archive, when README, CATALOG, CHANGELOG, CITATION.cff, the disclosure aggregate, and skill discovery must agree, or when a go or no-go release verdict needs recorded evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adapting academic findings for a public audience (op-ed, social post, podcast) and the simplification must stay evidence-faithful, avoid overclaiming, respect embargoes, and disclose AI assistance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, t...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert raw notes, error logs, voice dictation, or screenshots into crisp GitHub-flavored markdown issue reports. Use when the user pastes bug info, error messages, or informal descriptions and wants a structured GitHub issue. Supports images/GIFs for visual evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain the official OpenMeld Changelog from repository evidence. Use when deciding whether a change needs a Changelog entry, writing or publishing an entry, preparing release notes, validating generated Changelog files, or historically backfilling missing changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when diagnosing a Wake that failed, stalled, or produced no visible reply — dispatch, setup handoff, or reply-path issues. Routes to the deterministic trace evidence path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。