「implementation」の検索結果

Dispatch code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate recommender system quality for the CSX4207 Vinyl Record Store. Use whenever you must compute or report recommender metrics (Precision@k, Recall@k, HitRate@k, MRR, MAP@k, NDCG@k, coverage, diversity, novelty, serendipity, personalization), design an evaluation protocol/split, run a baseline comparison, or write the evaluation section of a course deliverable. Covers formulas, JavaScript reference implementations, and the reporting checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Receive and act on code review feedback with technical rigor, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate Figma designs into production-ready application code with 1:1 visual fidelity. Use for Figma URLs, node IDs, implementation requests, or components that must match Figma specs; use the local `figma` skill for general Figma MCP context and setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Figma MCP server to fetch design context, screenshots, variables, and assets from Figma, and to translate Figma nodes into production code. Trigger when a task involves Figma URLs, node IDs, design-to-code implementation, or Figma MCP setup and troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven development lifecycle — EARS requirements, technical design docs, implementation tracking, and contribution guidelines. Use when planning features, defining requirements, or managing project lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI and machine learning workflow covering LLM application development, RAG implementation, agent architecture, ML pipelines, and AI-powered features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for LangChain and LangGraph development with Python, covering chain composition, agents, memory, and RAG implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build features guided by data insights, A/B testing, and continuous measurement using specialized agents for analysis, implementation, and experimentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposes a large implementation plan into small-model-sized tasks executed by supervised worker agents (e.g. Haiku) in dependency-ordered parallel waves, with a plan-first approval gate inside every task, file-based state for context compaction, and a hard escalation ladder. Use when a master plan or multi-workstream feature is too large for one session and should be executed cheaply by many small agents under frontier-model supervision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured planning workflow for any coding task. Use at the start of every new feature, bug fix, refactor, or implementation request. Analyzes the project, asks up to 5 clarifying questions, creates a TODO.md, gets user approval, then executes task by task. Never writes code before a plan is approved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops an implementation plan ready for wave-orchestration to execute. Takes the user's goal or rough plan as input, mines the codebase for facts, grills the user one question at a time for the decisions, drafts the planning/ artifacts (task DAG, wave table, worker prompt template, state file), then reviews its own plan on two axes before seeking approval. Use when the user wants to turn a feature idea, master plan, or backlog into a wave-orchestration execution plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the dedicated Kinect wall harp implementation team. Use whenever the user asks to build, implement, continue, fix, QA, document, or ship the Kinect wall harp, Kinect v2 wall-depth harp, FreenectTD depth-blob hand tracking, projected wall strings, pluck synth harp, or this feature's Layer 1 tool/recipe/docs. Use this before the generic tdmcp-pipeline for this feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in vector databases, embedding strategies, and semantic search implementation. Masters Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, Milvus, and pgvector for RAG applications, recommendation systems, and similar

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session — trigger phrases "execute the plan", "independent tasks", "parallel tasks", "subagents for the plan","split the plan into subagents". Dispatches a fresh subagent per task with two-stage review after each: spec compliance first, then code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

設計ドキュメントに基づいて実装計画を生成します。ScalarDB特有のスキーマ定義、トランザクション実装、統合テストを含む実装可能なタスク指示書を作成し、フェーズ別の実装ロードマップを提供します。

Design principles for building polished, native-feeling SwiftUI apps and widgets. Use this skill when creating or modifying SwiftUI views, iOS widgets (WidgetKit), or any native Apple UI. Ensures proper spacing, typography, colors, and widget implementations that look and feel like quality apps rather than AI-generated slop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance on Swift Testing best practices, patterns, and implementation. Use when developers mention: (1) Swift Testing, @Test, #expect, #require, or @Suite, (2) "use Swift Testing" or "modern testing patterns", (3) test doubles, mocks, stubs, spies, or fixtures, (4) unit tests, integration tests, or snapshot tests, (5) migrating from XCTest to Swift Testing, (6) TDD, Arrange-Act-Assert, or F.I.R.S.T. principles, (7) parameterized tests or test organization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance on iOS accessibility best practices, patterns, and implementation. Use when developers mention: (1) iOS accessibility, VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, or assistive technologies, (2) accessibility labels, traits, hints, or values, (3) automated accessibility testing, auditing, or manual testing, (4) Switch Control, Voice Control, or Full Keyboard Access, (5) inclusive design or accessibility culture, (6) making apps work for users with disabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。