4,915 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Pre-contract vendor privacy due diligence per GDPR Article 28(1). Covers risk questionnaires, technical controls assessment, certification review, data flow analysis, and documented sufficiency decisions for processor engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of EU Standard Contractual Clauses under Commission Decision 2021/914 across all four modules (C2C, C2P, P2P, P2C). Covers clause-by-clause completion, Annex I-III drafting, and SCC module selection. Keywords: SCCs, standard contractual clauses, module selection, data transfers, Annex completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements the GDPR Article 17 right to erasure (right to be forgotten) workflow, covering all six grounds for erasure, five exceptions, technical deletion versus anonymization decisions, and third-party notification under Article 19. Activate for erasure request, deletion request, right to be forgotten, Art. 17 queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the Privacy Threshold Analysis screening process to determine whether a full DPIA is required. Provides a quick-screen questionnaire, threshold criteria based on WP248rev.01, escalation triggers, and documentation requirements. Activate when evaluating new processing activities, system changes, or procurement decisions. Keywords: PTA, privacy threshold analysis, DPIA screening, quick-screen, threshold criteria, WP248, escalation triggers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement privacy-preserving record linkage across datasets using Bloom filter encoding, secure hash matching, threshold tuning for precision and recall, and false positive management. Enables entity resolution without exposing raw personally identifiable information between parties.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides determination of the correct lawful basis under GDPR Article 6(1)(a)-(f) for each processing activity. Includes decision tree logic for consent vs legitimate interest vs contract necessity. Activate when evaluating legal grounds for processing or reviewing lawful basis selections. Keywords: lawful basis, Article 6, consent, legitimate interest, legal obligation, contract.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for obtaining explicit consent for international data transfers under GDPR Article 49(1)(a). Covers informed consent requirements including risks of transfers without adequacy decisions or appropriate safeguards, specific destination country disclosure, and the narrow scope of derogation-based transfers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CPRA §1798.121 sensitive personal information restrictions and compliance. Covers all 9 sensitive PI categories including SSN, precise geolocation, racial/ethnic origin, biometric, genetic, health, and sex life data. Right to limit use/disclosure, permitted purposes, and implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides assessment and application of GDPR Article 49 derogation conditions for international data transfers in the absence of adequacy decisions or appropriate safeguards. Covers explicit consent, contract necessity, public interest, vital interests, public register, and compelling legitimate interests with restrictive interpretation per EDPB Guidelines 2/2018. Keywords: Art. 49, derogations, transfer exceptions, explicit consent, compelling legitimate interests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accountability agent selection, intake questionnaire completion, certification decision, annual recertification, and Global CBPR Forum transition. Keywords: APEC, CBPR, cross-border privacy, accountability agent, certification, Global CBPR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements data subject rights mechanisms for AI systems including right to explanation of AI decisions, contestation procedures, human review, model output correction, and training data access. Covers GDPR Arts. 15-22 and AI Act Art. 86. Keywords: data subject rights, AI explanation, contestation, human review, training data access, model correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing. Covers training data lawfulness evaluation, model risk assessment, automated decision triggers, and AI-specific DPIA methodology. Keywords: AI DPIA, machine learning impact assessment, EDPB AI guidelines, model risk, training data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements AI transparency requirements under EU AI Act Arts. 13-14 and GDPR Arts. 13-14. Covers user notification of AI interaction, system capability disclosure, limitation documentation, and meaningful information about automated logic. Keywords: AI transparency, EU AI Act, GDPR notification, explainability, automated decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert a stakeholder summary markdown file into a single self-contained HTML executive report — bottom line and decision asks up front, supporting detail later — styled with a Test Double-derived palette and self-contained mermaid diagrams. Use when the user wants to turn a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary into an HTML report, generate an HTML version of a summary doc, or produce a shareable HTML file from a summary markdown. Produces an HTML sibling file only; does not publish anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers the core attributes of the current code repository and its projects — languages, frameworks, tooling, and where things live — and writes a concise reference section directly into the project's AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md for other skills, agents, and hooks to consume. Use when scanning, analyzing, or detecting the project's technology stack, build tools, or repository structure. Does not create or update project documentation — use project-documentation for writing feature or system docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a feature specification from scratch with plan-a-feature and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location, posting the spec as a parent page and each companion artifact (decision log, team findings, technical notes) as a child page beneath it. Use when the user wants a new feature planned, designed, scoped, or specified AND posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not plan to local files only — use plan-a-feature. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess a requirement change mid-project against the rules and past decisions, then update every affected artifact together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 单次决策兑现｜准备—执行—后果—回归 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design natural vertical street-interview and walk-and-talk video prompts for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when a user wants spontaneous documentary energy, a referenced recurring person, first-person handheld follow, concise dialogue, moving daylight, believable street parallax, or a consent-led interaction that must fit 4–15 seconds without unreachable beats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness. Produces a concise review pack, records risks and verification, and blocks landing until a human explicitly approves or approves with required fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the bioengineering, translational systems biology, and tissue modeling frameworks of Linda Griffith, Professor of Biological Engineering at MIT and tissue engineering pioneer. Use this skill whenever facing decisions, designs, or evaluations in bioengineering, tissue modeling, microphysiological systems (organs-on-chips), synthetic matrix design, disease subtyping, or drug target validation. Reach for this skill when evaluating preclinical models (human vs. animal), reframing overlooked or neglected pathologies into rigorous engineering challenges, selecting biomaterials, designing cell signal processing assays, or diagnosing operational flaws in experimental platforms (e.g., PDMS compound absorption or Matrigel lot variability).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。