5,656 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze application logs for performance insights and issue detection including slow requests, error patterns, and resource usage. Use when troubleshooting performance issues or debugging errors. Trigger with phrases like "analyze logs", "find slow requests", or "detect error patterns".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage metrics and identify untested code paths. Use when analyzing untested code or coverage gaps. Trigger with phrases like "analyze coverage", "check test coverage", or "find untested code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor blockchain mempools for pending transactions, gas analysis, and MEV opportunities. Use when analyzing pending transactions, optimizing gas prices, or researching MEV. Trigger with phrases like "check mempool", "scan pending txs", "find MEV", "gas price analysis", or "pending swaps".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aggregate breaking cryptocurrency news from 50+ sources including CoinDesk, CoinTelegraph, The Block, and Decrypt. Use when needing to monitor crypto market news, track announcements, or find coin-specific updates. Trigger with phrases like "get crypto news", "latest Bitcoin headlines", "DeFi announcements", "scan for breaking news", or "check crypto updates".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. Use when the task requires adobe integration pitfall review. Trigger with "Adobe pitfalls", "review Adobe integration", or "find obsolete Adobe code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms research findings into executive-ready briefings. Automatically activated when user mentions 'executive', 'briefing', 'C-suite', 'board', 'leadership', or 'presentation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find opportunities to add metrics and estimate numbers when exact data unavailable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, analyze, proofread, and modify Office documents (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx) using the officecli CLI tool. Use when the user wants to create, inspect, check formatting, find issues, add charts, or modify Office documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build AI-powered software with TypeSafe: small units of AI intelligence you can use like programming primitives. Its System One models, including Jev, turn natural language and application state into typed judgments and probabilities that code can combine. Use when a feature needs programmable common sense, when brainstorming what AI could make possible in an app, or when an LLM prompt-and-parse step could become a structured decision. Applications include routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive experiences; these are starting points, not the limits. Read live docs and cookbooks to find useful patterns and discover new combinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update documentation across the repo after API changes. Finds stale references in docs, examples, docstrings, and fixes them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', reviewing a small diff you don't trust, or a brief that asserts something about existing code ('make X public', 'X already handles Y') before you design against that assertion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spawn the comment-sicko subagent, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find failing PR checks, inspect logs or external check links, and apply focused fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the mistakes agents keep repeating in this repo and make each one impossible. Try architecture first, then types, then a lint whose error names the fix, then a test, and write docs last. Prove each check fails on a real past mistake. Repeat this each time the operator corrects you. Use for /correct.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish what is actually true and current for the surface you are about to change — not just search. Grounding = locate the authoritative source and reconcile sources that disagree (code vs doc, migration vs schema, memory vs current code, live vs archived), not take the first hit. Use before any grep/find/explore of the codebase or docs, when deciding which of several definitions is the real one, or when a doc or memory conflicts with the code. Covers the source-of-truth hierarchy, reconciliation discipline, scoped ripgrep, and the docs/tags.yml + docsearch.py index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web search and research using Perplexity AI. Use when user says "search", "find", "look up", "ask", "research", or "what's the latest" for generic queries. NOT for library/framework docs (use Context7) or workspace questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive citation management for academic research. Search OpenAlex, PubMed, and Google Scholar for papers, extract accurate metadata, validate citations, and generate properly formatted BibTeX entries. This skill should be used when you need to find papers, verify citation information, convert DOIs to BibTeX, or ensure reference accuracy in scientific writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile current scholarly evidence for a scientific manuscript or research brief. Use when the user explicitly asks to gather literature, references, background evidence, competing findings, or a manuscript research packet. Uses Parallel Search by default, Parallel Extract for source verification, Parallel Research for explicitly deep/exhaustive work, optional explicit Parallel Chat, and optional Perplexity only when requested or allowed as a failure fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。