5,383 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user wants to pull data out of one or more PDFs (invoices, bank/credit-card statements, receipts, reports, tables) and put it into a spreadsheet. pdf_read is one of the most-used tools; this codifies the read-PDF → structure → write-Excel workflow. Powered by LMCP on macOS and Windows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multi-agent coding tasks via Claude DevFleet — plan projects, dispatch parallel agents in isolated worktrees, monitor progress, and read structured reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve a vehicle history report from a VIN using the CarsXE API. Use this when a user wants to know a car's history — past owners, accidents, title status, odometer readings, or whether it's been in a crash.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Look up registered vehicle owners and residents using the CarsXE Ownership API (Enterprise). Use this when the user asks who owns a VIN, who lives at an address, contact details for a named person, or people in a ZIP. Do not use for lien/theft checks or vehicle history reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Change or repair code, config or services without weakening tests; report what ran and what did not. Use when: implementing a change or fixing a defect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Codex-native Amazon FBA research workflow using LaunchFast MCP. Use when the user wants a single report covering product research, IP risk, supplier sourcing, and PPC keyword intelligence. Requires `research_products`, `ip_check_manage`, `supplier_research`, and `amazon_keyword_research`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report AgentGuards guardrail status. Use when the user asks whether AgentGuards is active, healthy, or correctly configured in Codex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material, in free text; no first word is a mode. Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'document why we chose X', 'make it our standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y' proposals, 'resolve the RFC', 'we accepted the proposal', 'document the auth module', 'capture how the payment system works', reference material, how-to instructions, a repeated agent procedure, a user flow with examples over an existing spec, or a finished report or one external material already in hand. Name any document type inside the subject — journey, prd, idea, or cpat included — to get exactly that type. Planning a feature, an investigation not yet done, or an intended user journey the request asks to plan ('plan the onboarding journey') → /archcore:plan. Checking docs against code or docs health → /archcore:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; on the default branch it reviews the unpushed and uncommitted work. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Takes an optional path, tag, topic, or ref in free text; no first word is a mode — say 'are docs out of date', 'audit the knowledge base', 'close out the feature', or 'capture this pattern' in plain words. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EMC pre-compliance risk analysis for KiCad PCB designs — 18 check categories, 44 rule IDs covering ground planes, decoupling, I/O filtering, switching harmonics, clock routing, differential pair skew, board edge radiation, PDN impedance, return paths, crosstalk, ESD protection, shielding, and magnetic leakage from switching inductors. Produces severity-ranked risk report with pre-compliance test plan. Supports FCC Part 15, CISPR 32, CISPR 25 (automotive), MIL-STD-461G. SPICE-enhanced when available. Use when the user asks about EMC, EMI, radiated/conducted emissions, FCC compliance, CE marking, CISPR, ground plane issues, decoupling strategy, clock routing EMC, switching noise, differential pair skew, or whether their board will pass EMC testing. Also for "will this pass FCC?", "check my EMC", "is my ground plane okay?", "check my decoupling", or "generate an EMC test plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Ontoly Software Graph evidence, CLI reports, MCP, and official Ontoly Agent Skills before searching source files when reviewing architecture, dependencies, request flows, configuration, impact, or security-sensitive ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daily-scheduled AI news tracker. Collects updates from 80+ AI entities across 6 sources every 24 hours (default 08:00 UTC+8). Generates scored, deduplicated Markdown reports. Supports unattended cron/scheduled execution with date-stamped idempotent output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a live website for AI-engine discoverability (AEO/GEO). Crawls the site, runs 16 deterministic checks plus a 6-dimension content evaluation, and produces a scored report (A-F) with prioritized fixes. Use to get a baseline before improve-aeo-geo, or to measure progress after changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right way to represent a dataset so a reader gets the finding in three seconds — a catalog of 20+ chart and diagram forms with when-to-use and failure modes, plus the encoding decisions that make any of them readable (takeaway headline, direct labels, kill the axis, highlight-and-mute, show the caveat). Style-agnostic — use with whatever palette or design system the destination already has. Use when charting survey results, benchmark data, usage metrics, or research findings for a post, brief, deck, or report, and whenever the default bar chart feels like it's burying the point.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit of Solidity code while you develop. Trigger on "audit", "check this contract", "review for security", "loop mode", "run the auditor in loop mode", "run 3 passes". Modes - default (full repo) or a specific filename. Loop mode runs several passes in one scan, each pass told what the earlier ones found, and ends in one combined report; it remembers findings between scans in a ledger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it survives expert anonymous review — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Soil Biology & Biochemistry or deciding whether a soil-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the soil-process-mechanism bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Field Crops Research or deciding whether an agronomy / crop-physiology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-scale multi-environment and replication bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment or deciding whether an agroecosystem-environment manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-to-landscape environmental-outcome bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Communications Earth & Environment or deciding whether an earth, environmental, or planetary-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the solid-and-complete-advance bar, Nature Portfolio reporting/data standards, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Agronomy for Sustainable Development or deciding whether an agronomy / farming-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the explicit-and-evidenced sustainability-contribution bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。