「tasks」の検索結果

Create a new team composition file following the agent-almanac team template and registry conventions. Covers team purpose definition, member selection, coordination pattern choice, task decomposition design, machine-readable configuration block, registry integration, and README automation. Use when defining a multi-agent workflow, composing agents for a complex review process, or creating a coordinated group for recurring collaborative tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Personal GTD (Getting Things Done) coach that helps users achieve their annual goals. Use when users mention goals, plans, daily tasks, productivity, time management, task tracking, reviews, or need help breaking down objectives into actionable steps. Automatically remembers user's goals and progress across conversations. Supports multiple languages. 新手引导：输入 `/gtd 新手`、「这个怎么用」「第一次用」「能干嘛」时，走 SKILL.md 的〈新手上路〉，不要直接开始干活。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel SDLC batch runner. Analyzes a list of independent task descriptions, groups them by heuristic file-conflict prediction, dispatches one worktree-isolated background agent per task (each running the full pipeline-orchestrator: BA → Dev → QA → Sec → Docs), and aggregates results into a single batch summary. Use when: - `/sdlc:batch` invokes this skill after parsing its arguments (Step 2 of commands/batch.md) - You have 2+ independent feature/fix descriptions to run through the SDLC pipeline in parallel Do NOT use for: - A single task (use pipeline-orchestrator directly via /sdlc:start) - Tasks that must share a single working tree (this skill isolates each task in its own git worktree)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when tool outputs exceed 2000 tokens, tasks span multiple conversation turns, sub-agents need to share state, context window is bloating, plans need to persist across summarization, terminal/log output needs selective querying, or when user mentions "offload context", "dynamic context discovery", "filesystem memory", "scratch pad", "reduce context bloat", or "just-in-time context loading".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-agent supervisor that manages a fleet of Claude Code agents running in tmux windows. Auto-discovers spare worktrees, spawns agents, monitors state, kicks idle agents, approves safe confirmations, and recycles worktrees when done. TRIGGER when user asks to supervise agents, run parallel tasks, manage worktrees, check agent status, or orchestrate parallel work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to be walked through code, not handed a report: "walk through this", "guided code walk", or "explain this codebase". Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to create a multi-session learning plan. Returns a milestoned plan, practice, and review rubric. Don't use for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "wait, what", "the explanation is unclear", "say that again", or asks to restate the last response in plain language. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to mine recent chats for workflow preferences. Don't use for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user runs /toolchain-health and wants a trustworthy green/yellow/red verdict on the installed toolchain with ranked repairs. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when repo content crosses into working context or synthesized knowledge. Flags injections and blocks derived instructions. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks why a plan is wrong or says "poke holes in this". Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user requests an accessibility audit, a11y check, or WCAG compliance review. Don't use for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asking "overkill?", "elegant?", "audit", or "taste-test this", or setting a taste register. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a current decision needs pressure-testing until the rationale is clear to a skeptic. Not for tasks requiring source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants adversarial stress-testing of a proposed architecture, structure, or shape. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user describes an AI workflow gap or uses an ambiguous cross-session reference such as 'the PR Bob mentioned'. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human explicitly asks for a full repository agent-compatibility pass returning a scored report with prioritized fixes. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or task in fast, full, or ultra mode. Ultra creates an indexed multi-file bundle with deeply specified phases for execution by a smaller model. Use for "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks", or exhaustive implementation planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。