「tests」の検索結果

Execute explicitly authorized tests and record traceable expected, observed, evidence-bound results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export one validated QA manifest as matching HTML and PDF without executing tests or evidence commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, tests pass, and the work needs integrating - merging, opening a pull request, or being left in place

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants tests planned for existing code or a test audit — unit, integration, E2E scenarios exportable to Playwright, playwright-cli UI checks, a coverage matrix — 'criar testes para o UserService', 'plano de testes E2E do login', 'auditar a cobertura'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), for implementing features (feat-feature) or to run an existing plan (feat-exec).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a backend-only action plan — API endpoints, services, models, migrations, jobs and their tests — 'plano de backend para o endpoint X', 'plan the orders API'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md with the PWDEVIA method. Do NOT use for UI work (feat-frontend), full features spanning backend and UI (feat-feature), writing code (feat-exec) or quick 1–3 file fixes (feat-quick).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions CI/CD for GNOME apps — build+test with GTK4/libadwaita on runners, Flatpak builds via flatpak-github-actions, attaching .flatpak bundles to releases, optional OCI publishing to GHCR, and headless GUI smoke tests with Xvfb/AT-SPI. Use when setting up CI, release automation, or GUI testing for a GTK app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement test-driven development (TDD) workflow using the red-green-refactor cycle. Use when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring existing code. Always write the failing test first, then implement minimal code to pass, then refactor. Essential for ensuring code reliability, preventing regressions, improving design through testability requirements, documenting expected behavior through tests, enabling confident refactoring, and maintaining high code quality standards throughout the development process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate browser testing, web scraping, and user workflow testing with Playwright across multiple browsers. Use when writing end-to-end tests for web applications, automating repetitive browser tasks, scraping data from websites, testing across Chrome/Firefox/Safari, taking screenshots for visual regression testing, testing authentication flows, filling and submitting forms programmatically, testing responsive designs across viewports, or any browser automation requiring reliable, cross-browser testing capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run browser-based smoke tests against the running Humans site using the Claude Code Chrome extension. Argument: all | smoke | auth | profile | consent | teams | admin | gdpr | i18n | [url]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-axis orchestrator: (1) clean section boundaries — naming, routes, views, ViewModels, DB ownership, cross-section access; (2) internal cohesion — no EF in service layer, caching in service only, proper interfaces, reusable ViewComponents, architecture-test coverage; (3) focused tests — grouped under the section, covering invariants/negatives/triggers, pruned of redundancy. Push-and-bot-review loop. Use when a sizable PR landed, a section shows arch drift, or /pr-review returned a non-trivial violation list. Camps is the gold-standard reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "bug report", "just check for bugs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR. Use when asked to "ship", "deploy", "push to main", "create a PR", "merge and push", or "get it deployed". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT push/PR directly) when the user says code is ready, asks about deploying, wants to push code up, or asks to create a PR. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates complete AEM components with dialog, HTL template, Sling Model, unit tests, and clientlibs. Supports extending Core Components and project components. When a Figma design URL is provided, fetches the design via Figma MCP (get_design_context) and translates it into pixel-perfect HTL, CSS, and JS. Follows Adobe Experience League best practices for AEM Cloud Service and 6.5. Use this skill whenever the user mentions creating, building, generating, or scaffolding an AEM component, or mentions component types like teaser, card, hero, banner, accordion, tabs, carousel, list, navigation, breadcrumb, or any custom AEM component. Also trigger when the user wants to extend a Core Component, create a component dialog, add a Sling Model, or convert a Figma design into an AEM component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a "product description" repo for a software product — a set of prose documents describing, from the outside in, what the user sees, what they can do, and exactly what happens when they do it, written from the code and tests, then verified against the running product and triaged into a bug list. Works for any product with a user (canvas editors, web apps, CLIs, chat products, mobile apps). Use when the user asks to "write a product description for X", "describe the user experience of X", "document how X behaves for the user", "make a behavior-spec repo", or wants a feature-by-feature, event-by-event account of an app's behavior rather than API docs. Also use to resume or extend an existing product description repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-Reference 進度掃描器 — 自動掃描 assets/scripts/**/*.ts 與 tests/*.ts，比對 cross-ref-code.md B-1 表格，產生進度差異報告。USE FOR: 進度掃描、cross-ref 更新。DO NOT USE FOR: 程式碼編輯、UI layout 調整。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply one logical code change with mandatory impact mapping, git snapshot, verification, and automatic revert on failure. Load when the user asks for a safe edit, verified change, one change at a time with rollback, or codespine-style edit loop. Also triggers on "safe change", "edit with verification", "don't break the build", "revert if tests fail", or any non-trivial code edit where blast radius matters. Always runs dependency-mapping first. Pairs with incremental-implementation for multi-slice work; this skill is one atomic verify cycle per invocation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a self-improvement loop for a shipped product's AI agents — production traces feed evals, evals feed improvement proposals (prompts, playbooks, retrieval configs), and a human approval gate promotes changes with rollback. Technique-agnostic: chooses per project between ACE-style evolving playbooks, GEPA/MIPROv2 offline optimization, or simple eval-driven iteration via references/techniques.md. Load when the user asks to make my product's agents self-improving, learn from production traces, add a learning loop, evolve prompts or playbooks safely, promote agent improvements, or GEPA-style optimization. NOT harness-evolution (that improves the coding agent), NOT experimentation (product A/B tests), NOT agent-run-retro (dev-phase manual retros — this skill is the production-scale continuation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve agent reliability over time — diagnose why agents fail and fix the setup. Triggers on: agent keeps failing, same mistake again, agent not improving, make agent smarter, agent quality plateau, agents ignore skills, agent skips tests, fix agent behavior, agent unreliable, improve agent setup, self-improving harness, agents worse over time, tune agent instructions, agent going in circles, agent ignores AGENTS.md, repeated agent errors. Requires harness v0 and eval harness. AUTO-ROUTED from harness-engineering on symptoms. Not first setup — harness-generation first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplify application code for clarity without changing behavior — refactor after tests pass, reduce nesting and duplication, match project conventions. Load when refactoring for readability, cleaning up after a feature ships, or when code review flags complexity. Also triggers on "simplify this code", "code simplification", "make this easier to read", "reduce complexity", "refactor for clarity". Not for compress/split/prune-skill (skill-library files). Pairs with technical-debt-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。