「tia」の検索結果

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create PydanticAI agents with type-safe dependencies, structured outputs, and proper configuration. Use when building AI agents, creating chat systems, or integrating LLMs with Pydantic validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review implementation plans for parallelization, TDD, types, libraries, and security before execution

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills. Use when you have accumulated feedback data and want to improve review accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Deep Agents code for bugs, anti-patterns, and improvements. Use when reviewing code that uses create_deep_agent, backends, subagents, middleware, or human-in-the-loop patterns. Catches common configuration and usage mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews PRs that add or modify Agent Skills, checking structural validity, design quality, and marketplace consistency. Use when reviewing skill file changes, auditing SKILL.md quality, or running automated skill PR reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies fixes from a prior review-llm-artifacts run, with safe/risky classification. Respects verify-llm-artifacts output when present to skip false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch unresolved review comments from a PR and evaluate with receive-feedback skill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign Stacktape's marketing website or Console through visual exploration, independent design critique, and browser verification. Use for substantial page, flow, or visual-system design work, including agent-led redesigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to generate well-branded interfaces and assets for RIPDPI (an Android-native, Compose-first VPN and DPI-bypass app), either for production or throwaway prototypes/mocks/etc. Contains essential design guidelines, colors, type, fonts, brand-ship icons, and an interactive UI kit of every public composable from the live ui/components tree.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct substantial repository work across Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build with a concise brief, parallel agents, evidence-based completion, and optional cross-CLI continuation. Use for project onboarding, multi-step implementation, agent coordination, verification planning, low-interruption setup, or deciding how another CLI should take over. Do not use it as a permission gate or mandatory workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill for initial ActonOS project setup, environment verification, and dependency installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jenkins migration to GitHub Actions — syntax mappings and the migration report template for Pipelines (declarative + scripted), shared libraries, Groovy scripts, credential bindings, agent labels, parallel stages, plugin replacements. Load with `migration-core` when migrating Jenkins sources to GitHub Actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically detect and de-identify PII (Personal Identifiable Information) and PHI (Protected Health Information) from clinical/medical text to ensure HIPAA compliance. Trigger when processing medical records, patient data, clinical notes, insurance information, or any healthcare-related text containing potential patient identifiers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert insurance claim adjuster with 15+ years in property/casualty. Specializes in coverage analysis, damage quantification (RC/ACV), liability determination, fraud detection, and settlement negotiation. Use when: insurance claim, damage assessment, coverage dispute, liability analysis, fraud investigation, claim settlement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts professional services agreements for healthcare providers and clients, covering HIPAA/HITECH compliance, BAA requirements, Anti-Kickback and Stark Law guardrails, credentialing warranties, malpractice insurance mandates, and patient care continuity on termination. Use when drafting healthcare provider contracts, medical services agreements, physician independent contractor agreements, or healthcare consulting engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute first API calls to Guidewire PolicyCenter, ClaimCenter, and BillingCenter. Use when testing initial connectivity, exploring API structure, or making your first insurance data requests. Trigger with phrases like "guidewire hello world", "first guidewire call", "test policycenter api", "guidewire api example".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies provider credentials via NPI MCP, searches Medicare coverage policies via CMS Coverage MCP, and maps clinical evidence to policy criteria with MET/NOT_MET/INSUFFICIENT assessment, per-criterion confidence scoring, and documentation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate owner-developer agreements covering scope, entitlements, schedule, pricing (fixed, GMP, cost-plus), change orders, payment and retainage, insurance, indemnity, IP, confidentiality, termination, and disputes. Use when user mentions "development agreement", "owner-developer agreement", "project development contract", "real estate development", "GMP", "cost-plus", "milestones", or "change orders".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a U.S. Consulting Services Agreement covering scope, compensation (hourly, fixed, retainer, hybrid), independent contractor classification, IP ownership, confidentiality, indemnification, liability caps, insurance, and dispute resolution. Use when drafting consulting contracts, professional services agreements, or independent contractor agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。