「each」の検索結果

Guided, section-by-section GDD authoring for a single game system. Gathers context from existing docs, walks through each required section collaboratively, cross-references dependencies, and writes incrementally to file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when proving that a frontend refactoring preserved existing behavior, selecting an appropriate safety net, validating each structural step, or assigning a PASS, PARTIAL, or NOT PROVEN preservation verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an executive administrative assistant — triaging a stacked calendar against competing priorities, deciding what reaches an executive versus what gets redirected, reconciling a multi-city travel itinerary or expense report, drafting on an executive's behalf within a delegated-authority boundary, or handling a scheduling conflict across time zones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Restoration Planner — screening or comparing CERCLA/RCRA remedial alternatives against the nine evaluation criteria, building a life-cycle cost estimate for a Feasibility Study, scoping a stream or wetland restoration design against a reference reach, sizing compensatory mitigation credits, drafting a Statement of Work or Remedial Action Work Plan, or scoping a Five-Year Review for a site with land-use controls in place.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a K-12 Education Administrator (principal/assistant principal/district administrator) — making a school-level policy or resource-allocation decision, handling a discipline or safety incident, evaluating a curriculum or staffing decision, or balancing competing demands from teachers, parents, students, and district requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Conveyor Operator — diagnosing a mistracking belt before it becomes edge damage or spillage, verifying every lockout/tagout isolation point on a conveyor with a gravity take-up or incline before entering the nip zone, calculating each conveyor's actual delivered capacity in a multi-conveyor line to find the true bottleneck, deciding whether a mechanical or vulcanized splice fits a given tension rating, or judging whether a pinch-point guarding gap needs an immediate stop versus a scheduled fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Crane and Tower Operator — deciding whether current gust readings require a stand-down given a specific load's sail area, running a blind lift through a signal person when the pick or landing zone is outside the cab's sightline, reading a fixed installation's load chart at the counterweight/jib configuration actually installed, calculating each crane's load share on a two-crane tandem pick, or judging when to set the jib to free-slew ahead of a wind event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Community Health Worker — screening a client for social-determinants-of-health barriers, triaging a referral to housing/food/transportation resources, translating a clinical instruction into a teach-back-verified action plan, or deciding whether a no-show pattern signals disengagement or an unaddressed barrier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a choreographer — building and teaching a dance number against a rehearsal-hour budget, staging repertory under a trust/estate's licensing rules, planning a tech-week spacing and cueing schedule, or diagnosing why a piece isn't reading from the audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Data Officer — resolving conflicting metric definitions across dashboards, deciding whether a dataset should be retained or purged, assigning data ownership for a system feeding regulatory or board reporting, sizing a privacy/breach risk against a proposed data collection, or auditing data readiness before an AI/ML initiative kicks off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Agricultural Technician — designing a soil, tissue, or seed sampling plan, interpreting pest scouting counts against an economic threshold, calibrating spray/seeding equipment, or troubleshooting a field data discrepancy before it reaches the agronomist or scientist who acts on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an accountant/financial controller — closing the books on a fixed calendar, resolving a bank or account reconciliation variance, evaluating a revenue-recognition or substance-over-form question, designing or testing an internal control, or triaging a discrepancy in financial records before it reaches the auditors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Application Security Engineer — checking whether an endpoint verifies object-level authorization (not just authentication), running threat modeling at design time rather than deferring security review to the end, triaging a dependency vulnerability by actual reachability rather than CVSS score alone, combining SAST/DAST/SCA tooling to cover their distinct blind spots, or applying context-specific output encoding to untrusted input. Distinct from an information security analyst — this role works inside the SDLC to prevent vulnerabilities before they ship, not detect and respond to intrusions in production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track or tenured Agricultural Sciences faculty member at a land-grant university — deciding whether to submit a grant this cycle versus wait, allocating time across the teaching/research/extension appointment split, diagnosing a stalled graduate student or field trial, or drafting a tenure-and-promotion dossier narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adhesive Bonding Machine Operator — distinguishing an open-time violation from a pot-life check, controlling bond line thickness with calibrated spacers rather than clamping pressure alone, verifying surface prep with a test rather than visual cleanliness, or confirming actual part temperature reached full cure rather than trusting chamber setpoint and elapsed time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an autonomous development loop that picks one task per iteration, implements it, verifies it, and commits the result — each iteration in a fresh context window. Use when user runs /ralph, mentions "ralph loop", "autonomous loop", "builder verifier", "run tasks automatically", "iterate on tasks", "develop autonomously", or wants an automated build-verify-commit cycle with task tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates Stitch screens from authored prompt files using MCP tools. Reads prompt sections, sends each to Stitch for generation, and fetches resulting images and code. Use when user mentions "generate in stitch", "create stitch screens", "run prompts in stitch", "send prompts to stitch", "generate screens from prompts", "fetch stitch images", or has prompt-v*.md files ready for generation. Requires Stitch MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone E-E-A-T scoring rubric for a URL or content draft. Scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust 0-5 each using concrete detectable signals, framed per Google's creating-helpful-content doc. Use when user says "E-E-A-T", "EEAT", "experience expertise", "trust signals", or "author authority".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a domain's backlink profile using Ahrefs: see who links to the domain, source Domain Rating, anchor text, link type, and when each link was first seen. Use when user says "Ahrefs backlinks", "backlink profile", "who links to", "link analysis", or "referring pages".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy a local project directory or Git repository to Volcengine as a running, reachable cloud service. USE WHEN: deploy to Volcengine, deploy to 火山引擎/火山, deploy this repo/project, publish current code, launch the app, run it in the cloud, expose it as a service, deploy to ECS/VKE/veFaaS, run on ECS, push to VKE, deploy as serverless/FaaS, or the user wants the agent to choose a Volcengine hosting target. If the user only asks which Volcengine deployment target to choose, use `volcengine-prepare` skill first. Not for creating a single standalone resource — use `volcengine-cli` skill for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a failing GitHub Actions run to green in as few CI runs as possible, with a bounded fix-critique-commit-push-recheck loop that batches every evidenced fix into each push. Use when the user supplies a GitHub Actions run URL or run ID and wants the failure fixed, or asks to "make CI green", "fix the failing workflow/build/tests", "fix the red build", or to keep iterating on a branch or pull request until its checks pass. Pulls run results and failed-job logs through the gh CLI, and sends every fix plan to the rubber-duck reviewer before any code is touched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。