「ios」の検索結果

Build face recognition systems with InsightFace, ArcFace, enrollment pipelines, HDBSCAN clustering, and privacy-compliant architecture. Activate on: face recognition, face enrollment, face clustering, identity verification, facial search. NOT for: general object detection (computer-vision-pipeline), emotion analysis (ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage DAG execution lifecycles including start, stop, pause, resume, and cleanup. Activate on 'execution lifecycle', 'stop execution', 'abort DAG', 'graceful shutdown', 'kill process'. NOT for cost estimation, DAG building, or skill selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design resilient React error handling with Error Boundaries, Sentry integration, recovery UI, retry patterns, and graceful degradation. Activate on: error boundary, crash recovery, Sentry, error fallback UI, retry logic, unhandled exceptions. NOT for: form validation errors (use form-validation-architect), API error codes (use api-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in temporal event detection, spatio-temporal clustering (ST-DBSCAN), and photo context understanding. Use for detecting photo events, clustering by time/location, shareability prediction, place recognition, event significance scoring, and life event detection. Activate on 'event detection', 'temporal clustering', 'ST-DBSCAN', 'spatio-temporal', 'shareability prediction', 'place recognition', 'life events', 'photo events', 'temporal diversity'. NOT for individual photo aesthetic quality (use photo-composition-critic), color palette analysis (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), face recognition implementation (use photo-content-recognition-curation-expert), or basic EXIF timestamp extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build low-fidelity wireframes, screen mockups, and user-flow diagrams in Frame0 (the hand-drawn Balsamiq-style wireframing tool) through its connected MCP server. Use when asked to wireframe a screen, sketch a UI, make a low-fi mockup, lay out an app's screens, or diagram a user flow with clickable links. Triggers: "wireframe", "frame0", "low-fi mockup", "sketch a screen", "user flow", "lo-fi", "rough out the UI". NOT for high-fidelity visual design, brand systems, or color/typography polish (use web-design-expert / Figma); NOT for production UI code (use frontend skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical methods for decomposing expert performance into cognitive and physical task components

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and review Cloudflare Durable Objects. Use when building stateful coordination (chat rooms, multiplayer games, booking systems), implementing RPC methods, SQLite storage, alarms, WebSockets, or reviewing DO code for best practices. Covers Workers integration, wrangler config, and testing with Vitest. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure the path from an inbound event (webhook, email, SMS, GitHub comment, file, cron) to an agent spawn in the Port Daddy fleet. Use when wiring trigger sources to agents, reviewing the io-wiring registry, adding a trust/permission gate, hardening output sinks (SSRF/path traversal), scoping tools by provenance, or proving the spawn path is safe against prompt-injection → tool-abuse. Encodes ADR-0093 and the red-team threat model. NOT for generic Coast Guard sandboxing (ADR-0050), the macaroon push-grant gate alone (ADR-0053), or non-fleet code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft professional emails for various contexts including business, technical, and customer communication. Use when the user needs help writing emails or composing professional messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end form handling with react-hook-form, Zod schemas, validation patterns, error messaging, field arrays, and multi-step wizards. Use for complex forms, validation architecture, autosave, field dependencies. Activate on "form validation", "react-hook-form", "Zod", "form error", "multi-step form", "wizard". NOT for simple HTML forms, backend validation only, or non-React frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision-theoretic framework for agents embedded within the environments they model and act upon

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frontend stack decisions, Cloudflare deployment patterns, component systems, and internal tools architecture. Use for framework selection, deployment strategy, design system bridging, shadcn setup. Activate on "frontend architecture", "tech stack", "Cloudflare Pages", "component library", "internal tools", "shadcn setup". NOT for writing CSS (use frontend-developer), design critique (use design-critic), or backend APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An innate exploratory drive that guarantees no graph node remains permanently invisible to an agent population. After a warm-up period (step > 3), each agent fires a coverage scan with probability |unseen_nodes| / |all_nodes|. When triggered, the agent teleports directly to the globally unseen node with the highest belief uncertainty, works it, and returns control to the normal action-selection loop. Probability is self-annealing: it starts near 1.0 when almost everything is unseen and decays toward 0.0 as coverage saturates, requiring no manual schedule. The mechanism is "innate" (hard-coded into the agent step loop) as distinct from the "adaptive" EFE path, which requires local neighbors and learned precision weights. Together they form a two-layer exploration architecture: adaptive for locally-guided foraging, innate for topological completeness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。