3,992 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when building Hono web applications or when the user asks about Hono APIs, routing, middleware, JSX, validation, testing, or streaming. TRIGGER when code imports from 'hono' or 'hono/*', or user mentions Hono. Use `npx hono request` to test endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Playwright E2E testing skill combining planning, generation, and healing. Trigger: When writing, debugging, or planning E2E tests, working with *.spec.ts files, Playwright config, test fixtures, or when asked to create/fix/plan browser tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
📈 SEO & Content Marketing skill suite derived from alirezarezvani/claude-skills. Keyword research, content audits, SERP analysis, technical SEO and content strategy. Provides 10 specialised commands for seo, content, marketing workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for tests and release verification. Triggers: regression test, Playwright, E2E, contract test, coverage, CI flake, TDD, 테스트, 회귀 테스트, 품질 게이트.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explainability (XAI) audit for products containing AI components. Five-stage tier-scaled check: risk classification, stakeholder×question matrix, fidelity audit, system card, recourse path. Honest about what was validated functionally vs what needs user testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design the smallest viable test to validate or invalidate a critical assumption. Based on Torres's assumption testing framework, organized by Gilad's AFTER model (Assessment → Fact-Finding → Tests → Experiments → Release Results).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when opening, merging, or releasing a PR for imp - branching off main, `gh pr create`, enabling auto-merge, writing the PR body or a CHANGELOG entry, cutting a tagged release (version bump + CHANGELOG + tag + GitHub release). Symptoms - "PR stuck BLOCKED", "my last commit didn't land on main", "which check is required", "how do I cut a release", "auto-merge merged too early", "check-release failed", "STALE.md blocks git pull". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing) or perf measurement / baseline refresh (benchmark-cuda).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when benchmarking, profiling, or A/B-testing CUDA kernels or end-to-end perf in the imp inference engine on RTX 5090 (sm_120), including refreshing tests/perf_baseline.json or publishing numbers to docs/BENCHMARKS.md and the README. Triggers on "benchmark kernel", "profile cuda", "ncu", "nsys", "kernel timing", "kernel sum", "occupancy", "bandwidth bound", "compute bound", "roofline", "perf baseline", "is this regression real", "decode dropped", "aggregate throughput", "two-image A/B", "prefill kernel A/B". Do NOT use for writing/optimizing kernel code (sm120-cuda-expert) or output-quality checks (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building imp, running its test suite, checking CI status, or debugging build/test failures - "make build", "run the tests", "test-gpu", "verify-fast", GTEST_FILTER, Docker/CUDA toolchain, dependency bumps, "CI is red/blocked", "which gate failed", stale objects / segfault after a header edit, hook edits, docker-entrypoint env vars, determinism or perplexity checks. Do NOT use for benchmarking/profiling (benchmark-cuda) or output-quality batteries (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working on or testing imp-server and its HTTP APIs - OpenAI/Anthropic endpoints, /v1/chat/completions, /v1/messages, /v1/responses, SSE streaming, tool calling, json_schema/regex/GBNF constrained decoding, thinking/reasoning_content, cache_control/prefix cache, model loading and swapping, request priority, X-Request-Id, OTLP tracing / traceparent / Jaeger, /metrics, container env (IMP_SET), "server returns 404/garbage", API compliance. Do NOT use for CLI-only inference (imp-cli), kernel work (sm120-cuda-expert), or pure output-quality checks (check-degeneration).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement or modify Python, JavaScript, SCSS, templates, CLI, HTTP, logging, or tests. Use for code changes that require architecture, style, testing, and verification conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or update automated tests for a change using the repository’s verification rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use when implementing a feature, bugfix, refactor, or regression test; prefer stable integration/API/UI coverage and pull deeper test strategy from the bundled references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. Use when a .NET repo needs an explicit quality stack in `AGENTS.md`, docs, or pipeline YAML.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply MCAF ML/AI delivery guidance for data exploration, feasibility, experimentation, testing, responsible AI, and operating ML systems. Use when the repo includes model training, inference, data science workflows, or ML-specific delivery planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use TUnit. Use when a repo uses `TUnit`, `TUnit.Playwright`, `[Test]`, `[Arguments]`, `ClassDataSource`, `SharedType.PerTestSession`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds base, upside, and downside operating scenarios with key assumption sensitivity and return distribution analysis. Use when building operating cases, stress testing projections, or presenting scenario analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes construction risk with EPC contract review, delay and cost overrun scenarios, and completion guarantee structures. Use when modeling construction risk, evaluating EPC terms, or stress testing project timelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds CPR/CDR/severity vectors with scenario analysis across interest rate and economic environments. Use when modeling prepayment behavior, projecting default scenarios, or stress testing pool performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates demand forecasts for toll roads, airports, and ports with independent engineer review and scenario sensitivity analysis. Use when analyzing traffic studies, validating demand forecasts, or stress testing revenue projections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates unfunded commitment obligations with call probability, pacing models, and portfolio-level exposure management. Use when analyzing unfunded exposure, managing commitment pacing, or stress testing capital calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates commodity price exposure with forward curve analysis, hedging strategies, and break-even price sensitivity. Use when analyzing commodity risk, designing hedging programs, or stress testing price assumptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。