「acceptance」の検索結果

Provider-independent governance workflow for verifying and correcting human- or model-generated video descriptions. Use for pre-caption critique and post-caption revision, aspect-by-aspect factual review, critique precision/recall/constructiveness, second-stage peer review, calibration, appeals, versioned triplets, provenance, and acceptance reporting; not for pixel/audio QA, accessibility captioning, model training, or creative shot direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent media quality control and delivery direction for generated images, video, audio, ads, product content, social clips, broadcast and streaming assets, localization packages, and mixed-source edits. Use when an agent must define final export specs, inspect technical and perceptual quality, check captions/audio/color/accessibility/provenance/rights, create delivery sheets, version filenames, checksums, manifests, package deliverables, set acceptance or rejection criteria, and perform final delivery QA before handoff to a platform, broadcaster, streamer, client, or ad trafficker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UE (user experience engineering) skill for defining end-to-end user experience behavior and interaction logic. Use for tasks like flow design, interaction models, state machines, error recovery, input validation, usability heuristics, accessibility, and turning UX intent into testable acceptance criteria for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a vague request or GitHub issue into a concrete, testable spec using five structured elements (problem, scope, acceptance criteria, edge cases, success criterion) before writing any code. Prevents scope creep, PR churn, and mid-implementation pivots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing web CSS/UI styling so requirements, state ownership, and acceptance checks are locked before edits to prevent rework churn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define test cases BEFORE implementation, ensuring every API, business rule, and user journey has verifiable acceptance criteria during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to define tests, plan test coverage, create test cases, or when user asks "define tests", "test planning", "what to test?", "test cases", "test coverage", "TEST-", "test-first". Consumes EPIC- (scope), API-, DBT-, BR-, UJ-. Outputs TEST- entries with Given-When-Then format. Feeds v0.7 Implementation Loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute implementation within EPICs following test-first development, continuous SoT updates, and code traceability during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to start building, implement an epic, begin coding, or when user asks "start building", "implement epic", "coding", "development", "build execution", "implementation", "write code". Consumes EPIC- (context), TEST- (acceptance criteria). Updates existing IDs and creates code. Outputs working code with @implements traceability tags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured implementation plan from an evidence draft. Validate paths, obtain configured independent Codex and Qoder reviews, synthesize available advice against repository evidence, preserve the draft, and produce testable acceptance criteria and validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a rough idea, a bug, or a batch of unsolved problems into well-structured GitHub issue(s) and file them with `gh`, auto-classifying type + labels from the content (recommend, then confirm) and following Rove's conventions (beginner-friendly framing, concrete file pointers, an acceptance checklist, zero AI/Anthropic attribution). Handles single, batch, and "file the unsolved problems" modes. Use when the user says "file an issue", "open a GitHub issue", "draft a good first issue", "batch these as issues", "上报 issue", "提个 issue", "报个 bug", "把没解决的发上去", or wants to hand low-priority tasks to outside contributors. Distinct from the daemon-owned internal issue store (`rove api issue-*`); this skill is for outward-facing GitHub issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cucumber runs behavior-driven (BDD) tests written as plain-language Gherkin feature files and matches each Given/When/Then step to code. Use when the user wants to write feature files, implement step definitions in JavaScript or TypeScript with cucumber-js, share state through a World, add hooks, tags and profiles, or run BDD scenarios in CI. Also use when the user mentions "cucumber," "BDD," "Gherkin," "feature files," "given-when-then," "step definitions," or "behavior-driven." For contract testing, see pact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record user-decided ADRs or inspect their health read-only. Preserve attribution and acceptance evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record user-decided ADRs or inspect their health read-only. Preserve attribution and acceptance evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform QA testing on running web applications using cmux_browser. Covers functional testing, accessibility auditing, edge case testing, and structured reporting with evidence. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User says "test this", "QA this", "QA this PR", "check the app" - User says "run QA", "verify the build", "test the UI" - User asks to "check if it works", "validate the feature" - User says "acceptance testing", "smoke test", "regression test" - User asks to "find bugs", "test for bugs", "break it" - User wants to "check accessibility", "run axe", "a11y audit" **Covers:** Any web application accessible via HTTP. Uses cmux_browser (Playwright under the hood) for all browser interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert an approved PRD or clear requirements into an implementation-ready technical spec with scope, interfaces, and acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task is in pm_uat - verify every acceptance criterion and the human's comments yourself in the browser, on a device, or over a loopback HTTP request, record a verdict per criterion, then move to human_uat or need_revision

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence rules for completion claims. Use before ticking an acceptance criterion, ending an implementation run, or writing anything that says something works, passes or is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase A of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: inventory the legacy application, split responsibilities, capture command and state contracts, build a coverage matrix, and define acceptance evidence without implementing Avalonia UI. Use only in an explicit WinForms-to- Avalonia migration when behavior is undocumented or the orchestrator routes here. Generated artifacts must use the current repository's real paths, terminology, and capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate tests in red or expand mode and run-and-heal new tests. Use when the user says "lets expand test coverage", "I want to automate tests", "lets write acceptance tests", or "I want to do ATDD"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposition methodology for pm agent — turns an approved ARCH document into a Beads task list with explicit dependencies, time-boxes, and acceptance criteria. The pipeline can only orchestrate work it can see; this skill defines what "seeable work" looks like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。