「architecture」の検索結果

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for architecture - invoke with $agent-architecture

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing an autonomous agent, planning agent architecture, building a scheduled automation, or creating a Claude Code agent workflow. Triggers: 'design an agent', 'build an automation', 'agent architecture', 'automate this workflow', 'create a scheduled agent', 'shell script agent'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates 6-phase SDLC pipeline (discovery, requirements, architecture, workstreams, implementation, summary) for guided feature development. Use when user runs /core:develop command, requests spec-driven development, wants to create implementation plans with architecture decisions, or mentions "SDLC", "spec-driven", "plan feature", "development pipeline". Supports plan persistence, wave-based resume, autonomous mode, and architecture/implementation verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs, builds, and deploys AI agents or multi-agent systems on Google Cloud. Provides an interactive workflow to gather requirements, recommend a tailored architecture, and generate deployment instructions. Use when designing or implementing agentic systems on Google Cloud. Don't use for general Google Cloud solution architecture (use google-cloud-solution-architecture instead) or for narrow tasks targeting a single product without agent context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactively discovers requirements and designs holistic, multi-product system architectures, solution blueprints, and deployment recommendations for complex workloads on Google Cloud. Use when designing end-to-end cloud solutions, selecting and integrating Google Cloud services, generating architecture diagrams, or conducting requirements discovery for new cloud workloads or migrations. Don't use for single-product tasks (use product-specific skills), initial onboarding or authentication (use google-cloud-recipe-*), Well-Architected Framework reviews or audits (use google-cloud-waf-*), or workloads covered by specialized solution skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when gathering, structuring, and documenting requirements for a Financial Services Cloud (FSC) wealth management implementation — including financial planning workflow discovery, portfolio review process mapping, client lifecycle requirements, advisor tooling needs, and FSC architecture determination (managed package vs. FSC Core). Trigger keywords: wealth management requirements, FSC requirements gathering, financial planning workflow, portfolio review process, advisor tools setup, FSC data model scoping, wealth management process mapping. NOT for implementation, configuration, or code — use financial-account-setup, fsc-action-plans, or apex/fsc-financial-calculations for those. NOT for FSC architecture decisions — use architect/wealth-management-architecture. NOT for Health Cloud or NPSP requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 106 SfSkills `architect` skill packages. Solution and platform architecture: multi-org strategy, scalability limits, licensing, Well-Architected reviews and architecture decision records. Use when the request mentions architecture, solution design, ADR, Well-Architected, scalability, large data volume, multi-org, licensing, tenant isolation, HA/DR, technical debt. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated .NET 8 architecture conventions whenever structuring or reviewing a backend service: clean architecture layering and which direction dependencies point, when CQRS with MediatR is worth it, cross-cutting concerns as pipeline behaviours, minimal APIs grouped by feature, keeping DbContext in Infrastructure, health checks and structured logging, WebApplicationFactory integration tests, and when AOT pays off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend a conservative shadow-only review reference architecture from valid offline evidence. Use only when the user explicitly asks for a reference-architecture recommendation or uses the bundled synthetic fixture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds comprehensive design systems and design bibles with production-ready CSS. Expert in design tokens, component libraries, CSS architecture. Use for design system creation, token architecture, component documentation, style guide generation. Activate on "design system", "design tokens", "CSS architecture", "component library", "style guide", "design bible". NOT for typography deep-dives (use typography-expert), color theory mathematics (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), brand identity strategy (use web-design-expert), or actual UI implementation (use web-design-expert or native-app-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What you can build and do with an always-on AI agent that has episodic memory. Covers concrete product ideas, workflows, emergent capabilities from persistence plus memory, and real-world examples of deployed persistent agents. Helps you go from "I have the architecture" to "here's what it actually does for me." Activate on: "what can an always-on agent do", "persistent agent use cases", "agent applications", "proactive agent ideas", "what to build with episodic memory", "always-on agent product", "personal AI assistant ideas", "/always-on-agent-applications". NOT for: building the architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), designing inputs (use always-on-agent-inputs), safety and privacy (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domine padrões comprovados de arquitetura backend incluindo Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture e Domain-Driven Design para construir sistemas mantíveis, testáveis e escaláveis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Híbrido RNN+Transformer com inferência O(n). Tempo linear, contexto infinito, sem cache KV. Treina como GPT (paralelo), infere como RNN (sequencial). Projeto Linux Foundation AI. Produção em Windows, Office, NeMo. RWKV-7 (março de 2025). Modelos até 14B parâmetros.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating, documenting, or updating architecture diagrams, flowcharts, sequence, ER, class, or state diagrams using Mermaid in docs/architecture/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws an interactive HTML Architecture Viewer for any code flow the user names. Walks through seven research-driven steps (flow, name, repo research, lens colors, evidence flags, lens+mechanism per stop, build) and verifies links, claims, and generated artifacts before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore an unfamiliar codebase and build a reusable architecture summary. Use for repo onboarding, understanding legacy or inherited code, mapping architecture before a migration or refactor, tracing a bug or feature path, or answering "what does this project do?". Documentation-first, then data flow — ends in a concise technical architecture summary with file:line evidence, not a raw file dump.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair confirmed architecture drift in small batches while preserving public canon and avoiding broad opportunistic refactors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review repository architecture using Ontoly Software Graph and MCP capabilities. Use when asked to explain architecture, module boundaries, package topology, service ownership, or architectural risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure architecture updates document affected stakeholders, notification plan, and deprecation/retirement signals to keep knowledge aligned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。