「auditing」の検索結果

Security auditing for code, configs, and infrastructure. Use when the user wants to audit or improve security: scan for vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, command injection, path traversal), detect hardcoded secrets and credentials, review auth and authorization, check dependencies for known CVEs, audit config files for insecure defaults, or generate security reports. Trigger on "security audit", "vulnerability scan", "code review for security", "find secrets", "check for vulnerabilities", "OWASP", "CVE", or questions about code security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route retrieval of Chinese medical guidelines, consensus statements, regulatory documents, drug information, safety notices, standards, and public-health materials through authoritative originals and verified fallback copies. Use when a canonical medical source is blocked, slow, unavailable, moved, paywalled, or difficult to parse, or when designing and auditing domestic medical-source fallback rules. Do not treat secondary summaries or reposts as independent clinical evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic workflow for auditing TypeScript codebases for import hygiene issues (value vs. type imports, duplicates), missing base class extensions, and incomplete barrel file re-exports, with actionable fix patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and resolve file access issues by verifying directory structure, then reading multiple files in parallel batches for efficient auditing, with built-in guidance for validating TypeScript import patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the contribution flow is in scope: opening an issue, drafting or editing a PR body, splitting a change into chained/stacked PRs, or auditing a PR before requesting review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects missing zeroization of sensitive data in source code and identifies zeroization removed by compiler optimizations, with assembly-level analysis, and control-flow verification. Use for auditing C/C++/Rust code handling secrets, keys, passwords, or other sensitive data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans TON (The Open Network) smart contracts for 3 critical vulnerabilities including integer-as-boolean misuse, fake Jetton contracts, and forward TON without gas checks. Use when auditing FunC contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token integration and implementation analyzer based on Trail of Bits' token integration checklist. Analyzes token implementations for ERC20/ERC721 conformity, checks for 20+ weird token patterns, assesses contract composition and owner privileges, performs on-chain scarcity analysis, and evaluates how protocols handle non-standard tokens. Use when integrating or accepting arbitrary ERC20/ERC721 tokens, auditing a token implementation for standards conformity, or assessing risk from weird tokens such as fee-on-transfer, rebasing, missing return values, or blocklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or libraries — particularly those with `unsafe`, FFI, or concurrent code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchain modules and CosmWasm contracts for consensus-critical vulnerabilities — chain halts, fund loss, state divergence. 25 core + 16 IBC + 10 EVM + 3 CosmWasm patterns. Use when auditing custom x/ modules, reviewing IBC integrations, or assessing pre-launch chain security. Updated for SDK v0.53.x.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Substrate/Polkadot pallets for 7 critical vulnerabilities including arithmetic overflow, panic DoS, incorrect weights, and bad origin checks. Use when auditing Substrate runtimes or FRAME pallets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Solana programs for 6 critical vulnerabilities including arbitrary CPI, improper PDA validation, missing signer/ownership checks, and sysvar spoofing. Use when auditing Solana/Anchor programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive C/C++ security review for memory corruption, integer overflows, race conditions, and platform-specific vulnerabilities. Use when auditing native C/C++ applications, reviewing daemons or services for memory safety, or hunting integer overflow / use-after-free / race conditions in userspace code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing existing Public Equity Investing models or spreadsheets. Do not use to build a new model from scratch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring or installing a rig bundle (packaged, shareable artifact that instantiates an opinionated OpenRig topology + workflow), reasoning about the bundle vs extension boundary, or auditing a bundle for portability. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent bundles from working anywhere but the operator's machine, and the inspect-before-install discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores how completely an implementation fulfills a PRD/spec, case by case, and produces a single comparable final grade. Invoke only when explicitly named (e.g. run spec-driven-eval); do not auto-trigger. Use when benchmarking spec-driven implementations, grading acceptance criteria, evaluating whether a feature was 100% implemented, comparing multiple implementations of the same PRD, or auditing implementation and test coverage (unit and e2e) against product requirements. Do NOT use for planning or building features (use tlc-spec-driven), writing PRDs, or general code review unrelated to a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a visual or interaction technique you already built into a reusable web-design skill, by isolating the one mechanism that makes it work while reproducing its approved reference exactly around that focus, and packaging it with a demo that proves both the mechanism and the visual fidelity. Covers finding the mechanism, naming the technique plainly, disclosing the verified runtime and renderer, auditing reference layers, carrying real numbers instead of adjectives, preserving owned staging, keeping expensive gotchas, declaring the boundary against neighbouring skills, and browser-verifying before claiming it works. Use when a page, canvas scene, shader, scroll effect, layout system, or hover interaction turned out well and should become a skill rather than staying in one project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for using n8n-mcp MCP tools effectively. Use when searching for nodes, validating configurations, accessing templates, managing workflows, organizing workflows into folders, managing credentials, auditing instance security, or using any n8n-mcp tool. Provides tool selection guidance, parameter formats, and common patterns. IMPORTANT — Always consult this skill before calling any n8n-mcp tool — it prevents common mistakes like wrong nodeType formats, incorrect parameter structures, and inefficient tool usage. If the user mentions n8n, workflows, nodes, or automation and you have n8n MCP tools available, use this skill first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。