「based」の検索結果

Navigation in React Native — both React Navigation v7 (classical, modular) and Expo Router (file-based, Expo 49+). Stack, tab, drawer navigators, deep linking, typed navigation, modal presentation, authentication flow patterns. Use this skill to: - Pick navigation lib based on what's installed (@react-navigation/* vs expo-router). - Configure typed routes with ParamList types or Expo Router's generated types. - Set up deep linking (URL schemes, Universal Links, App Links). - Build authentication flow with conditional navigators. - Use modal presentation correctly. Do NOT use this skill for: - Project structure (see rn-conventions). - Platform-specific differences (see rn-platform-specific). - State / storage (see rn-state-and-storage). - Testing navigation (see rn-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flask web framework conventions: app factory pattern with create_app(), Blueprint registration with url_prefix, MethodView for class-based API views, Marshmallow schema validation, WTForms for HTML forms, Flask-Login for session auth, flask-jwt-extended for stateless API auth, Jinja2 template conventions, error handlers, and extension initialization. Activated automatically by flask-plugin/stack.md. Use this skill to: - Structure Flask applications with the app factory and per-feature Blueprints. - Validate JSON request data with Marshmallow and HTML forms with WTForms. - Implement session-based auth with Flask-Login or token auth with flask-jwt-extended. - Render Jinja2 templates safely or return JSON responses for API mode. - Register global error handlers for consistent error responses. Do NOT use this skill for: - SQLAlchemy ORM model patterns and Flask-Migrate — see flask-plugin:sqlalchemy-patterns. - Python language idioms — see python-foundation:python-conventions. - Testing patterns — see python-foundation:pytest-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when analyzing market breadth charts, specifically the S&P 500 Breadth Index (200-Day MA based) and the US Stock Market Uptrend Stock Ratio charts. Use this skill when the user provides breadth chart images for analysis, requests market breadth assessment, positioning strategy recommendations, or wants to understand medium-term strategic and short-term tactical market outlook based on breadth indicators. All analysis and output are conducted in English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TanStack Router best practices for type-safe routing, file-based routing, data loading, search params, and navigation in React. Use when building React SPAs with complex routing, implementing type-safe search params, setting up route loaders, integrating with TanStack Query, or configuring code splitting and preloading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate enriched ICP-based lead lists with Exa Agent, including structured scoring and CSV output. Use when generating leads, building prospect lists, finding companies to sell to, outbound research, or ICP-based company discovery. Triggers on leads, lead gen, prospect list, find companies, ICP, outbound list. Distinct from lead-magnet (content asset that captures emails).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert web articles or blog posts into slides through a content.json pipeline, translate or rebuild existing PPTX files onto a template, and edit an already-open PowerPoint deck with COM Automation (RefURL, overflow review). Use for article-to-slides conversion, deck translation, template-based rebuilds, or live COM editing of an open deck. Not for simply reading, inspecting, or lightly editing a .pptx file. Triggers on 記事をスライド化, スライド翻訳, 開いているパワポを編集, COM自動化, RefURL, content.json.

houtu-dependencies enterprise-grade Spring Cloud microservice foundational framework complete usage guide. GroupId is io.github.lujiafa, covering unified response, exception handling, parameter parsing, session authentication, permission control, signature verification, anti-replay, distributed lock, rate limiting, database field encryption, config decryption, access logging, canary routing, weighted load balancing, Feign enhancement, Sentinel circuit breaking, service discovery, Swagger documentation, crypto utilities, HTTP client, monitoring metrics, and other enterprise-grade capabilities. When the project build file (pom.xml or build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) contains io.github.lujiafa or houtu-related dependencies, or when the user mentions houtu or houtu-dependencies, this Skill must be read and code must be generated strictly following framework conventions. Even if the user is simply doing regular Spring Boot development (e.g., writing Controller, Service, Feign), as long as the project includes houtu, the houtu approach must be used instead of native Spring. When the user explicitly wants to use the houtu framework and the project has not yet included it, proactively add the BOM and required Starters; when the project already includes it, proactively identify and import required module dependencies based on business scenarios during coding, naturally integrating framework capabilities to enhance business services based on business semantics, rather than waiting for the user to specify each one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Elaboration Likelihood Model to design persuasion strategies by matching message type to audience elaboration level. Use this skill when the user needs to craft persuasive communications, choose between argument-based and cue-based messaging, predict attitude durability after a campaign, or when they ask 'why did the message fail to persuade', 'how to change resistant attitudes', or 'should we use data or endorsements'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement collaborative filtering for recommendations based on user behavior patterns. Use this skill when the user needs to build a recommendation engine from user-item interaction data, find similar users or items, or predict ratings — even if they say 'users who bought this also bought', 'similar users', or 'recommend based on behavior'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement dynamic pricing strategies that adjust prices in real-time based on demand, time, and competition. Use this skill when the user needs to build a dynamic pricing system, implement surge pricing, or optimize prices for perishable inventory — even if they say 'real-time pricing', 'surge pricing', or 'demand-based price adjustment'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit Document Object Model (DOM) Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities. Unlike Reflected or Stored XSS, the attack payload is executed purely on the client-side as a result of modifying the DOM environment, often without the payload ever reaching the backend server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities where malicious payloads are executed entirely within the victim's browser via insecure JavaScript execution, often bypassing server-side WAFs completely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute advanced SQL Injection attacks to bypass WAFs and extract data from complex architectures. Use this skill for Boolean-Based Blind, Time-Based Blind, Second-Order SQLi, and Out-of-Band (OOB) SQLi across MySQL, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, and Oracle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity procedural generation design-to-code translation. Noise-based terrain/placement, tile & grid systems, dungeon/room generation, seed & reproducibility, content budget & constraint systems, runtime vs baked generation. DESIGN INTENT format: INTENT/WRONG/RIGHT/SCAFFOLD/DESIGN HOOK. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unity state and behavior system architecture. FSM, Hierarchical FSM, Behavior Trees, stack-based state machines, Animator-vs-code decisions, state machine testing. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Account-based marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill to build a target account list, tier it 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many, size it against sales capacity, turn intent and engagement signals into plays, write the multi-channel orchestration contract each tier runs on, and measure the program in account coverage, penetration and pipeline instead of MQLs. Also triggers on: ABM, account-based marketing, target account list, TAL, named accounts, account tiering, 1:1 ABM, one-to-few, programmatic ABM, account selection, ideal customer profile fit, intent data, buying signals, 6sense, Bombora, Demandbase, account penetration, account coverage, sales and marketing alignment on accounts, enterprise account program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education Teacher, Postsecondary — defending a shrinking trade or health-science program against a cutback decision, backward-mapping a shop or lab curriculum to an industry credential's exam blueprint, resolving a competency-based grading dispute where a passing average hides a failed safety check-off, or setting the terms of an advisory-committee review or work-based-learning placement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze budget allocation systems for departmental budgeting, variance analysis, rolling forecasts, zero-based budgeting, and capital allocation using FP&A frameworks and driver-based planning methodologies..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured exploratory testing sessions using test charters, timeboxing, and heuristics. Use when user says "exploratory testing", "charter-based testing", "explore the app", "unscripted testing", "session-based testing", "find unknown bugs", or needs to test an area without predefined scripts - even if they don't explicitly say "exploratory".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a velocity-based release roadmap with risk buffers. Use when the user says "release plan", "when will we ship", "plan the next release", "map sprints to milestones", "estimate our release date", "how many sprints until done", or wants to translate a backlog into a delivery timeline - even if they don't say "release planning". Based on "Agile Estimating and Planning" by Mike Cohn (velocity, story points, cone of uncertainty, risk buffers).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create QA test strategy documents, coverage matrices, and risk-based test prioritization plans. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to plan what to test, why, and at what depth. Trigger on phrases like "write a test strategy", "test strategy document", "what should we test", "prioritize testing", "risk-based testing", "test coverage plan", "QA approach for this project", "coverage matrix", "test scope", "how should we approach testing this quarter", "where are our coverage gaps", or any request to define the strategic plan for testing - not the execution of it. Also trigger at project kickoff when a QA lead asks "how do we approach quality on this?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。