477 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Phase B of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: extract UI-independent application behavior, state rules, use cases, and boundary contracts with TDD and no WinForms/Avalonia references. Use only when an explicit migration still has business behavior in Forms or UI helpers, or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not build Avalonia XAML in this phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户在做决策时不确定自己是否真的理解某个领域，或准备进入一个看似熟悉但缺乏验证记录的领域时。 语言信号："我觉得我懂这个行业"/"这个看起来很简单"/"别人都在投这个"/"我来研究一下这个新领域" 不适用于：纯信息查询、日常琐事选择、用户已有充分专业知识的领域。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared review framework that every domain reviewer (pci, oracle, gov, edtech, healthcare, mlops, etc.) MUST follow. Defines the output artifact (TM-{slug}.md), mandatory sections, severity scale, verdict format, the workflow scaffold (when-invoked, Step-0 read-inputs, HANDOFF), and the "domain heuristic vs generic check" boundary. Eliminates duplication across the ~30 reviewer prompts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate checks exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects and composes the Godmode skills for a coding task, explains the activation boundary, keeps workflow skills from being skipped when they materially reduce risk, and identifies the task's current engineering lifecycle state. Use when starting a task with Godmode installed, deciding which skill to invoke, recovering a task after context loss, or checking whether a workflow applies. Not a replacement for the selected skill's instructions or for repository-local rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and executes compatibility-preserving migrations across APIs, schemas, frameworks, dependencies, protocols, storage, and infrastructure with baselines, coexistence, staged cutover, rollback or forward-fix paths, and explicit removal criteria. Use for deprecations, upgrades, data moves, contract changes, and replacing live implementations. Not for a local refactor with no external state or compatibility boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates or improves an Agent Skill by defining a precise trigger boundary, concise procedural instructions, progressive-disclosure references, deterministic helpers, routing evals, and validation evidence. Use when authoring or reviewing SKILL.md, skill metadata, bundled references, or skill packaging. Not for ordinary project documentation or application code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex needs Genesis capabilities through MCP without joining Genesis's session lifecycle. Covers tool selection, explicit state changes, and session-boundary limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generating test data and fixtures. Use when factory pattern design, boundary value data generation, synthetic data generation, or seed data management is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when users request Android competitor research, systematic feature or interface mapping, evidence screenshots, interaction coverage, comparison-ready product dossiers, or Android system-boundary verification without APK decompilation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map which elements of an assignment benefit from AI assistance vs. which AI use undermines. Use when redesigning tasks for AI-age classrooms or setting defensible AI use policies for specific assignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a read-only, evidence-first intake of an existing mini-program repository before planning or modifying code. Use when users ask to take over, understand, audit, resume, scope, or continue a WeChat or other mini-program project; when project facts may conflict with historical documents; or when an agent needs the framework, rules, Git state, build path, risks, unknowns, protected behavior, and change boundary. Produces a project fact map and handoff without changing code, installing dependencies, building artifacts, or claiming runtime, device, cloud, upload, acceptance, or release status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews Rust FFI code for type safety, memory layout compatibility, string handling, callback patterns, and unsafe boundary correctness. Use when reviewing extern blocks, #[repr(C)] types, bindgen output, or code calling C/C++ libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews ExUnit test code for proper patterns, boundary mocking with Mox, and test adapter usage. Use when reviewing _test.exs files or test helper configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repo-wide structural-maintainability review — code-judo restructurings, 1k-line file guard, anti-spaghetti branching, canonical-layer enforcement, anti-magic abstractions, explicit type/boundary contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
集約とトランザクション境界の関係を明確化し、複数集約を単一トランザクションに含めるアンチパターンを 検出・是正する。集約は強い整合性境界であり、ユースケースで複数集約を更新する場合は結果整合性を 使うべきという原則を適用する。コードレビュー、ユースケース設計、リファクタリング時に トランザクション境界の問題を検出する場合に使用。 対象言語: 言語非依存（Java, Kotlin, Scala, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Python等すべて）。 トリガー：「複数集約を同じトランザクションで更新している」「ユースケースに@Transactionalがある」 「集約間の整合性をどう取るか」「Sagaパターンを使うべきか」「トランザクション境界の設計」 「1トランザクション1集約」「結果整合性の実装」「集約をまたぐトランザクション」 といったトランザクション境界関連リクエストで起動。
Use when reviewing Spring Boot 4 / Java 17+ code with concrete files or diffs — pull requests, modules, or pasted Java/Spring sources — for migration risks, architecture boundary leaks, JSpecify null-safety gaps, security flaws, performance regressions, or Spring Data pitfalls. Not for Kotlin-only code, non-Spring frameworks, or generic review advice without code context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Traditional Chinese internal arts — tai chi chuan and qigong — as transmitted by classical lineages (Chen, Yang, Wu, Wu/Hao, Sun for tai chi; Ba Duan Jin, Yi Jin Jing, Liu Zi Jue, Wu Qin Xi, and other named sets for qigong) with an emphasis on alignment, rooted stance, breath-posture-mind coordination (the three harmonies), and the traditional lineage voice that Dr. Yang Jwing-Ming's YMAA line preserves. Also covers the safety boundary between traditional practice and clinical "medical qigong" claims. Use for queries about tai chi form learning, qigong set selection, internal-arts pedagogy, and the practical question of where to start.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systems programming from memory management through networking. Covers memory models (stack vs heap, manual allocation, garbage collection, ownership/borrowing), concurrency (threads, mutexes, channels, async/await, actor model, data races vs race conditions), operating system concepts (processes, virtual memory, page tables, system calls, file descriptors, signals), compilation (lexing, parsing, code generation, linking, static vs dynamic libraries), networking fundamentals (TCP/IP, sockets, HTTP, DNS, TLS), and the hardware-software boundary (caches, cache lines, false sharing, memory-mapped I/O). Use when working with low-level code, diagnosing system-level bugs, understanding performance characteristics, or bridging between high-level languages and machine behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。