「bounded」の検索結果

Create original short videos using the 手势边界换媒｜局部窗口、多形态验真与回归 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants a hand-defined local medium window, repeated geometry proof, strict clipping, and a controlled return with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 渲染扫描｜局部带逐段改写整体 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 日程闭环｜重复锚点串联整日任务 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a bounded mathematical slice for missing or unusable Jacobian capabilities, beyond a single-operation review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or audit a Jacobian operation’s mathematical contract, boundedness, exact results, and composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix LRU-bounded Flutter/bloc state classes that silently lose insertion-order updates. Use when: (1) a state class uses `Equatable` with a `LinkedHashMap<K, V>` field to preserve insertion order (LRU, MRU, recent-items caches), (2) `Cubit.emit` appears to drop emissions when an existing key is re-inserted or moved to most-recent, (3) LRU eviction evicts the "wrong" entry after a refresh, (4) a test that reports the same key twice and then overflows the cap sees the refreshed entry evicted instead of the oldest. Root cause: Equatable's default map comparison is structural (unordered), so reordering without changing keys/values produces an "equal" state that `Cubit.emit` suppresses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or evolve a repository-specific CLI, MCP and skills harness using MetaHarness, with bounded evaluation and explicit release authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate bounded investigation, review, or implementation tasks to Antigravity CLI from a supervising agent. Includes a background client for task progress, follow-up prompts, conversation recovery, cancellation, and visible failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate bounded tasks to Grok Build from a supervising agent such as Codex. Use when the user asks Grok to investigate, review, implement, or provide another perspective, or when a distinct coding agent would materially help. Includes a background ACP client for progress, follow-up prompts, permissions, and cancellation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When handing work to the Codex CLI earns its cost, and how to size the run: second-model review, bounded implementation hand-offs, sandbox permissions, model and reasoning effort. Use when the user asks for Codex or `codex exec`, when a change is complex or high-stakes enough that an independent reviewer would change the outcome, or when a delegated run needs its model, effort, or permissions chosen. For agents other than Codex itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight standalone design spec for AI coding agents: codebase scan → bounded clarify pass (3–5 questions, not a grill) → reviewed design doc written to docs/plans/ → independent scored review → stop. No task board, no build. Use when you want a spec to discuss, hand off, or review before committing to implementation. Chains into absolute-work when ready to build. Triggers on "absolute spec", "write a spec", "spec out this feature", "draft a design doc", "I want a spec to hand off / review, don't build it yet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task may benefit from a bounded subagent for implementation, large-codebase discovery at task start, independent review, requested or pre-commit code simplification, or expert work on complex decisions, modeling, automation, or repeated failures. The main agent chooses whether to delegate and accepts the result. Do not use for simple questions or short work with no meaningful review or delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research X data with Xquik, the world's fastest and cheapest X Twitter scraper service with the most complete X data. Use only when the request or active context identifies X or Twitter. Use for tweet search, tweet lookup, user discovery, profile timelines, threads, followers, trends, exports, or monitoring plans. Do not use for generic posts, other networks, or local dataset analysis that needs no X retrieval. Keep reads bounded. Require explicit confirmation before private reads, writes, persistent resources, or bulk jobs. Not affiliated with X Corp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and validate model-facing tool definitions with clear names, action-oriented descriptions, bounded JSON Schema parameters, explicit side effects, safe defaults, idempotency, errors, and realistic tests. Use when creating function-calling tools, MCP tools, agent actions, structured tool inputs, or when a model selects the wrong tool, invents arguments, or causes unsafe side effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Distributed Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Distributed Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from failure models, consistency contracts, and tail-latency-and-recovery performance through TLA+ model checking, Jepsen and Porcupine linearizability checking, and YCSB/DeathStarBench benchmarking with iptables and kill -9 fault injection, while treating unbounded leases and split-brain, clock skew under NTP, and GC-induced p99 spikes as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply obsidian markdown as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests obsidian markdown behavior or files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply obsidian bases as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests obsidian bases behavior or files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply memory management as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests memory management behavior or files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply adhd-friendly communication as a bounded agent workflow while preserving user intent, privacy, and host capabilities. Use when the user explicitly requests adhd-friendly communication behavior or files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。