「breaking」の検索結果

Fix data that has gone wrong and change shape without breaking what reads it: duplicates, nulls, inconsistent document shapes, a field that means two things, a column that has to change. Use when a report cannot be built because the data is not in the right shape, when duplicates, nulls or inconsistent shapes are producing wrong numbers, when a field is needed or has to change, before a migration, or when onboarding data from a new source that does not match the standard shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades Python pip/poetry/pipenv dependencies with breaking change handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades npm/yarn/pnpm dependencies with breaking change handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrades .NET NuGet packages with breaking change handling

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Protocol Buffer (.proto) files, buf.yaml, buf.gen.yaml, or buf.lock. Covers proto design, buf CLI, gRPC/Connect services, protovalidate constraints, schema evolution, and troubleshooting lint/breaking errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the same scrape or task across many accounts at once - each in its own browser profile with its own fingerprint, cookies and exit IP - and read data from sites that need a session or that answer a plain HTTP scraper with a captcha while answering a real browser. One command per site returns JSON, so there are no selectors to write or repair: Amazon and Walmart search, Google and DuckDuckGo results, Reddit posts and comments, X timeline, Medium, Yelp, Indeed job listings, Hacker News, GitHub, PyPI, npm, plus exit-IP and fingerprint checks. Use for multi-account operations you are authorized to run, price and listing monitoring per region, SERP collection, logged-in data, and scrapers that keep breaking. Also for 'scrape amazon', 'google search results', 'reddit data', 'scrape logged in site', 'run task on many accounts', 'site blocks my scraper', 'scraping without selectors'. Node or Python.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an approved implementation plan into self-contained beads issues with zero guesswork. Use when breaking down a plan file into actionable beads tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an approved implementation plan into self-contained Linear issues with zero guesswork. Use when breaking down a plan into actionable Linear tasks via the MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub PR with a shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts via gh. NOT for own-diff audit (mk:review); NOT for replying (mk:respond-pr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub PR with a single shallow correctness/security/breaking/AI-slop checklist and emits a verdict; optionally posts it via gh pr review. Use to review an external or teammate PR. NOT for deep pre-landing audit of your own diff (see mk:review); NOT for responding to received review comments (see mk:respond-pr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choosing and operating an HTTP API versioning strategy that doesn't break clients — Stripe's date-based pinned versions, the Deprecation/Sunset header pair (RFC 9745 + RFC 8594), URI vs header vs media-type approaches, and the version-transformer pattern. Grounded in Stripe's published architecture and IETF RFCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API migration strategies, deprecation workflows, and header/URL/content versioning. Activate on: API versioning, backward compatibility, deprecation, breaking change, API migration, v1 v2, sunset header. NOT for: schema evolution in data (use schema-evolution-manager), gateway routing (use api-gateway-reverse-proxy-expert).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive REST API design review with automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards. Catches inconsistent conventions, missing versioning, and design smells before APIs ship. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing API standards for a team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agile product ownership for backlog management and sprint execution. Covers user story writing, acceptance criteria, sprint planning, and velocity tracking. Use when writing user stories, creating acceptance criteria, planning sprints, estimating story points, breaking down epics, or prioritizing the backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the 5 Whys, or when the user wants the root cause of a failure: "why did this happen?", "this keeps breaking", "write the postmortem", "find the real cause". Asks why repeatedly with evidence at each step, then sets countermeasures. Skip for one-off typos or when the cause is already proven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for analytical thinking, or when a question needs breaking down and evidence: "why did metric X drop?", "what drives this?", "break this down", "what data do we need?". Builds a tree, hypotheses and evidence, ends with an answer and key uncertainty. Skip for quick verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web and open-source code for library usage, API syntax, and documentation via Exa. Use this whenever verifying an API signature, looking up how a library is used, checking a config file format, or resolving an error from a third-party dependency -- including when you think you already know the answer, since library APIs drift. Also use for questions documentation cannot answer: release timing, breaking changes, "is X still maintained", licensing, security advisories, and ecosystem comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or changing public C#/.NET APIs with compatibility and versioning constraints. Keywords: breaking change, API design, backward compatibility, binary compatibility, deprecation strategy, versioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when ranking competing initiatives for a roadmap, breaking a tie between two features, or auditing a backlog for hidden low-value work via Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tracing the root cause of a resolved incident or recurring bug — 5-whys chain, fishbone categorisation, contributing-factors split — even if the user says 'why does this keep breaking?'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when upgrading dependencies — 'update framework X', 'bump runtime version', or 'upgrade packages'. Covers changelog review, breaking-change detection, and verification. Stack-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Project Management] Use when creating user stories from PBIs, slicing features, or breaking down requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。