「check」の検索結果

Audit MCP (Model Context Protocol) server configurations for security issues. Use this skill when: - Reviewing .mcp.json files for security risks - Checking MCP server args for hardcoded secrets or shell injection patterns - Validating that MCP package-runner dependencies use exact reviewed versions, not bare names, @latest, or ranges - Detecting mutable npm/npx, bunx, pnpm dlx, yarn dlx, and npm exec references in MCP configurations - Auditing which MCP servers a project registers and whether they're on an approved list - Checking for environment variable usage vs. hardcoded credentials in MCP configs - Any request like "is my MCP config secure?", "audit my MCP servers", or "check .mcp.json" keywords: [mcp, security, audit, secrets, shell-injection, supply-chain, governance]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and track comprehensive due diligence checklists tailored to the target company's sector, deal type, and complexity. Covers all major workstreams with request lists, status tracking, and red flag escalation. Use when kicking off diligence, organizing a data room review, or tracking outstanding items. Triggers on "dd checklist", "due diligence tracker", "diligence request list", "what do we still need", or "data room review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run `gbrain skillpack-check` to produce an agent-readable JSON health report for the gbrain install. Wraps `gbrain doctor` + `gbrain apply-migrations --list` so a host agent (your OpenClaw's morning-briefing, any OpenClaw cron) can see at a glance whether the skillpack needs attention. Use when the user asks "is gbrain healthy?", when a cron fires a morning check, or proactively when something seems off (jobs not running, brain not updating, autopilot silent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic claim-by-claim verification for any content before it ships. Modeled on professional fact-checking desks (The New Yorker, ProPublica, IFCN standards): extract every verifiable claim, check each against live citable sources (never training data), assign a 6-level confidence status, apply corrections, and produce a scored pass/fail report. Includes a data-derived-claims gate for outputs produced FROM the brain or a database: PRODUCER ≠ VERIFIER (re-derive each claim via a different query path) and AFFILIATION ≠ AUTHORSHIP (person→thing claims resolve through typed edges), with delivery hard-blocked on unsupported claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest meeting transcripts from ANY meeting recorder into brain pages with attendee enrichment, entity propagation, and timeline merge. One unified pipeline: normalize the source into a standard transcript record, split multi-meeting recordings, resolve speakers by evidence, create the page, pass every surprising claim through the consistency check (transcript + brain + plausibility), enrich every entity, then run the verification checklist — substance AND sequence. A meeting is NOT fully ingested until the enrich skill has processed every entity AND the verification checklist passes, including the sequence verify (PASS or explicit user waive).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified Minions skill for both deterministic shell jobs and LLM subagent orchestration. Replaces the older `gbrain-jobs` routing intent. Use when: submitting gbrain jobs, shell/background tasks, spawning subagents, checking progress, steering running work, pausing/resuming, parallel fan-out. One durable, observable, steerable queue interface. Also carries the durable-execution doctrine for any operation expected to exceed ~2 minutes: capability ladder, deadman checks that verify the result was reported, and content-addressed stage checkpoints for expensive pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and run Python SDK verification with nox, Makefile targets, Ruff, mypy, pytest markers, sanity tests, type inference checks, and build checks. Use when adding Python tests, diagnosing Python CI, or validating Python SDK/provider changes. Do not use for TypeScript-only checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems — CLM, CRM, email, and document storage — with gap analysis and upcoming deadlines. Use when onboarding or renewing a vendor, when you need a consolidated view of what's signed and what's missing (MSA, DPA, SOW), or when checking for approaching expirations and surviving obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a loop that runs a prompt now and follows up either on a fixed schedule or through self-paced wakeups. Usage - /loop check the build, /loop 5m check the build, /loop check the PR every 30m. /loop list to show jobs, /loop clear to cancel all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit and vulnerability scanner for AI agent skills before installation. Use when: (1) evaluating a skill from an untrusted source, (2) auditing a skill directory or git repo URL for malicious code, (3) pre-install security gate for Claude Code plugins, OpenClaw skills, or Codex skills, (4) scanning Python scripts for dangerous patterns like os.system, eval, subprocess, network exfiltration, (5) detecting prompt injection in SKILL.md files, (6) checking dependency supply chain risks, (7) verifying file system access stays within skill boundaries. Triggers: "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill for security", "check skill before install", "skill security check", "skill vulnerability scan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior SecOps engineer skill for application security, vulnerability management, compliance verification, and secure development practices. Runs SAST/DAST scans, generates CVE remediation plans, checks dependency vulnerabilities, creates security policies, enforces secure coding patterns, and automates compliance checks against SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR. Use when conducting a security review or audit, responding to a CVE or security incident, hardening infrastructure, implementing authentication or secrets management, running penetration test prep, checking OWASP Top 10 exposure, or enforcing security controls in CI/CD pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent-session, per-sweep QA runbook for {{target_repo}}. Discovers PRs since the last check, then for each one checks out the branch, runs the full verification suite, deploys the change to the test environment, exercises it through the edge, and posts a pass/fail result as a GitHub check and comment. Test environment only — no production access, no merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hourly warehouse health sweep for {{warehouse_schema}}. Checks every monitored table's freshness against its SLA, compares row counts to the table's own trailing baseline, diffs the schema for drift, and checks for failed or stalled loads. Posts anomalies to {{alert_channel}} and drafts a GitHub issue in {{incident_repo}} with the likely cause. Read-only across the warehouse — never modifies data, tables, or pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly close runbook: how to walk {{close_sheet}}'s checklist, reconcile Stripe revenue against the recorded ledger, judge a missing supporting document, and spot an anomaly against prior months. Load this before touching a single checklist line so every item is judged to the same standard and only genuine open items reach a human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via fresh-agent Codex GPT-6-Astra ultra review, fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Base review is same-family provisional. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodically check WandB metrics during training to catch problems early (NaN, loss divergence, idle GPUs). Avoids wasting GPU hours on broken runs. Use when training is running and you want automated health checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub PR checks with gh, pull failing GitHub Actions logs, summarize failure context, then create a fix plan and implement after user approval. Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing PR CI/CD checks on GitHub Actions and wants a plan + code changes; for external checks (e.g., Buildkite), only report the details URL and mark them out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI Berkshire skill: 巴菲特价值投资买入前 Checklist. Source: skills/investment-checklist.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspects and visualises a ROS-2-enabled CARLA server from Docker containers, with no local ROS 2 install — list/echo/rate-check topics (the "are the topics actually on the wire" check), run the bundled map-and-lidar demo stack (hero vehicle with camera/lidar/GNSS/IMU on autopilot), and open RViz2 with the lane-network preset. Use when the user asks to "check the ROS topics", "echo /carla/map", "is CARLA publishing to ROS", "visualise the lidar in RViz", "open rviz", or "run the ROS 2 demo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ARS-Codex research, writing, manuscript review, study screening, and experiments. Use for deep research, literature or systematic reviews, meta-analysis, research questions, drafts, revisions, roadmaps, abstracts, citations, integrity checks, peer review, research-to-paper. Screen records: sr-screener. Citation triggers: check citations, look over the refs, 檢查引用, 檢查參考文獻, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사. Korean: 논문 심사, 논문 수정, 초록 작성, 체계적 문헌고찰, 연구부터 논문까지. Español: revisión de literatura, revisar artículo, enmendar mi artículo, escribir resumen, investigación a artículo. Also use for ARS aliases: /ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-3w, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, /ars-reviewer, /ars-mark-read, /ars-unmark-read, /ars-cache-invalidate, /ars-rebuttal-audit, /ars-full. Prompts, references, templates, and contracts live under ars/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check regulatory feeds now and report what's new since the last check, filtered by your materiality threshold. Use when the user says "check the feeds", "what's new", "regulatory update", when running from the scheduled agent, or when manually pasting a regulatory development for classification and diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。