「completion」の検索結果

Implements HIPAA workforce training requirements under 45 CFR §164.530(b) (Privacy Rule) and 45 CFR §164.308(a)(5) (Security Rule). Covers initial onboarding training, periodic refresher cadence, role-based content differentiation, documentation of training completion, and sanction policy integration. Keywords: HIPAA training, workforce training, security awareness, privacy training, §164.530(b), §164.308(a)(5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment privacy compliance checklist for AI/ML systems covering DPIA completion, lawful basis verification, transparency notices, human oversight mechanisms, bias testing, and post-deployment monitoring setup. Keywords: AI deployment, privacy checklist, go-live, model deployment, compliance gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules system certification process including self-assessment against the APEC Privacy Framework principles, accountability agent selection, intake questionnaire completion, certification decision, annual recertification, and Global CBPR Forum transition. Keywords: APEC, CBPR, cross-border privacy, accountability agent, certification, Global CBPR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check agent-produced plans, tests, or code against the owner's actual intent. Find missing meaning, unrequested work, stale truth, unreachable decisions, unsupported completion claims, and implementation debt. Use before approval or merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set recurring checks or completion watches with `sno heartbeat` and its persistent log reader. Use for periodic reports or unattended long runs. Not for calendar scheduling or commands watched directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 人屏同尺度书写｜既有字面、实体补笔与完成姿态 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill generates professional LinkedIn announcement text for intelligent textbooks by analyzing book metrics, chapter content, and learning resources to create engaging posts with key statistics, hashtags, and links to the published site. Use this skill when you need to create social media announcements about textbook completion or major milestones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OI-3 spike harness — ADVERSARIAL inline guidance variant. Worst-case anchor: ends with a final-sounding completion statement and gives NO instruction to return to the caller. Use only when a spike consumer skill invokes it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), plan a multi-module restructure before executing it (use plan-a-change), map domain boundaries before restructuring along them (use ddd-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure OpenAI Service integration. Manage Models, Deployments, Prompts, Completions. Use when the user wants to interact with Azure OpenAI Service data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing show completion status of an operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform the repository's risk-tiered independent final review before implementation completion. Use only when explicitly invoked or when repository instructions require it after behavior-impacting implementation work; audit the complete task diff, supported contracts, lifecycle and security boundaries, complexity, and tests before final verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically complete partial code snippets while satisfying semantic constraints including variable types, invariants, pre/post-conditions, interface contracts, and expected input/output behavior. Use when users provide incomplete code with specific requirements like "complete this function that takes a list and returns sorted unique elements" or "fill in this method body that must maintain the invariant that x stays positive" or "implement this interface method with these type constraints." Produces compilable, executable code with tests and a constraint satisfaction report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Blender scenes and assets for topology, transforms, normals, surface continuity, classified connections, intersections, modifier/node intent, procedural performance, simulation stability, protected-scene changes, and fixed-view visual evidence. Use after every major modeling or simulation stage and before render, bake, export, or claims of completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute research tasks — checklist soft gate, phase dispatch with explicit thesis_dir, budget enforcement (halt + approval card on overrun), skill_pin recording (version_hash content-hashed per skill directory), [x] written on completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ACE-Step and ACE-Step 1.5 for local or hosted AI music generation, including text-to-music, lyrics-to-song, instrumental beds, covers, repainting, stem/track extraction, track completion, LoRA personalization, REST/Python/Gradio workflows, rights review, and music integration for video, ads, games, and social content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query Boundless broker telemetry tables on Redshift for prod/staging operational data. Use when the user asks about broker health, request evaluations, request completions, proving times, skip rates, telemetry data, or wants to run SQL against the telemetry database on live networks. Also covers historical telemetry through 2026-04-24 stored as Parquet archives in S3 (queried via DuckDB). Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft verifiable, tight goal prompts for AI coding agents (Claude Code /goal, Codex Automations, Pi), either from a standalone task interview or from an already-approved to-goal handoff. Use when the user says "给我一个 goal 提示词", "帮我写个 goal", "设置一个自动化任务", "我想让 agent 自动做 X", or asks to turn a task into a self-running loop. Ensures every goal has a checkable completion criterion so the agent knows when it's done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。