「complexity」の検索結果

Heuristic story-point estimation for a single Jira ticket via the jira-estimator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'estimate KEY', 'story points for KEY', 'how complex is KEY'. NOT for complexity-only analysis (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast parallel codebase scouting. Spawns multiple Explore subagents to search directories simultaneously, returning a consolidated file map with architecture fingerprint, complexity estimates, and routing suggestions. Use before planning, debugging, or any task spanning multiple directories. NOT for reading a single known file in depth (use Read directly); NOT for semantic find-usages or go-to-definition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full Jira ticket context analysis via the jira-analyst agent — including media (attached images / PDFs / screenshots) and linked issues. Produces structured findings suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only. Triggers: 'analyze KEY', 'rca for KEY', 'describe KEY with media'. NOT for complexity scoring (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation (mk:jira-estimator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep spec analysis on a Confluence page. Reads page (+ children) via the confluence-as wrapper, produces a structured Spec Research Report with requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, ambiguities, and suggested user stories for human review. Read-only — does NOT create Jira tickets. Triggers: 'analyze spec for PAGE-ID', 'extract requirements from confluence page', 'spec research on URL'. NOT for raw page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for ticket complexity scoring (mk:planning-engine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow navigation assistant. Scans project state (plans, reviews, tests, git) and recommends the next step in the 7-phase pipeline. Use when asked "what should I do next?", "where am I?", "help", or at session start. NOT for domain complexity routing (see mk:scale-routing); NOT for skill discovery (descriptions handle that automatically).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-learning pre/post-task hooks and model/task routing from the Ruflo CLI, on a ruOS desktop. Use to add coordination, formatting, and learning around Claude Code operations, or to route work by complexity/cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user says "simmer this", "refine this", "hone this", "iterate on this", or asks to improve a specific artifact over multiple rounds. Runs an iterative refinement loop with investigation-first judges that read the code, understand the problem, and propose evidence-based improvements. Auto-selects single judge or multi-judge board based on complexity. Works on any artifact type: documents, prompts, specs, emails, creative writing, API designs, pipelines, codebases. Supports multi-file workspace targets, runnable evaluators, and open-ended optimization (model selection, pipeline topology, prompt tuning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns and QCs methylated-RNA-immunoprecipitation (MeRIP / m6A-seq) IP and input libraries using STAR or HISAT2 splice-aware mapping, samtools sort/index, IP/input matched-pair tracking, antibody-lot metadata recording, replicate concordance via deepTools multiBamSummary + plotCorrelation, IP enrichment QC via plotFingerprint and per-transcript IP/input ratio distributions, library-complexity saturation curves via PreSeq, and the explicit do-NOT-deduplicate convention for standard non-UMI MeRIP. Use when preparing paired IP and input BAM files for exomePeak2 / MeTPeak / MACS3 peak calling, evaluating MeRIP replicate concordance and IP enrichment, deciding whether to deduplicate (standard MeRIP typically NOT), choosing genome-vs-transcriptome alignment for downstream peak vs m6Anet workflows, recording antibody clone and lot metadata for cross-batch reconciliation, detecting failed IPs via saturation curves and IP/input distribution shape, or generating IP-over-Input bigWig tracks for visualisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive quality control for CLIP-seq libraries (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) covering library complexity (preseq), FRiP, IDR replicate reproducibility, read-distribution metagene, SMInput vs IgG control rationale, rRNA / snoRNA contamination, fragment-length distribution, and ENCODE-compliance thresholds. Use when assessing whether a CLIP library passed, deciding lenient vs stringent peak thresholds, comparing replicates with IDR rescue and self-consistency ratios, or distinguishing failed IP from over-amplified library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rework a change as if the intended UX and architecture had existed from day one — deleting compatibility cruft, dead branches, and accidental complexity instead of patching around them. Use when refactoring, cleaning up after a feature lands, removing flags, collapsing legacy paths, or when the user says the code "should look like X from scratch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hypertree decomposition approach to planning problems for reduced computational complexity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The intelligence layer of WinDAGs. Decomposes natural language tasks into Hierarchical Task DAGs (HTDAGs), matches subtasks to skills, executes waves in parallel, and dynamically expands nodes when complexity exceeds executor capability. Use for 'orchestrate', 'execute DAG', 'parallel agents', 'decompose task', 'coordinate skills'. NOT for single-skill tasks or simple linear workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Introduce people to AI, agentic AI, and AI skills with appropriate pedagogy for any audience. Covers LLM analogies, progressive complexity paths, aha-moment demos, audience-tailored explanations, workshop design, and overcoming emotional barriers to AI adoption. Activate on 'explain AI', 'introduce AI', 'AI workshop', 'AI demo', 'teach AI', 'AI literacy', 'onboard to AI', 'AI evangelism', 'explain agentic', 'explain skills to', 'AI training session', 'AI onboarding'. NOT for teaching ML engineering (use ai-engineer), not for building AI features (use ai-engineer), not for prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer), not for building training data pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and install ecosystem tools (Hermes plugins, skills, integrations) — assess complexity vs. benefit before installation, show examples for visual tools, and avoid "cloned but not configured" states.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code for YAGNI, removable over-complexity, reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then apply worthwhile simplifications. Use when the user asks to simplify, clean up, tighten, de-hack recent changes, identify logic that can be dropped, or review whether added safeguards and edge-case handling are actually needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run all code quality checks (security, complexity, test coverage) on the current PR and post a combined report as a GitHub PR comment. Use before merging a PR, during code review, or when asked to check code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find overly complex code: files over 300 lines, functions over 50 lines, deeply nested conditions (4+ levels), and magic numbers. Use for code quality reviews, pre-release checks, or when asked to assess code maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip designs to their essence by removing unnecessary complexity. Great design is simple, powerful, and clean. Use when the user asks to simplify, declutter, reduce noise, remove elements, or make a UI cleaner and more focused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。