「constraint」の検索結果

Writing efficient code that handles large data and tight constraints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep business diagnosis for when things aren't working. Uses Socratic questioning, first-principles reasoning, and constraint analysis to find WHY a business is stuck — not just prescribe solutions. Use when the user says 'my business isn't working', 'I'm stuck', 'what's wrong', 'diagnose my business', 'why am I not growing', 'help me figure out the problem', or describes a specific business challenge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive business strategy with premise deconstruction, business model stress test, pricing, go-to-market plan, and competitive positioning. Runs a 4-layer premise audit before strategy, then generates a full market research report with SWOT, 4P, 10-point business model validation, and constraint analysis. Use when the user has an idea and needs a strategic plan, competitive analysis, pricing strategy, GTM plan, or says 'business plan', 'strategy', 'pricing', 'go-to-market', or 'competitive analysis'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate database seed scripts with realistic sample data. Reads Drizzle schemas or SQL migrations, respects foreign key ordering, produces idempotent TypeScript or SQL seed files. Handles D1 batch limits, unique constraints, and domain-appropriate data. Use when populating dev/demo/test databases. Triggers: 'seed database', 'seed data', 'sample data', 'populate database', 'db seed', 'test data', 'demo data', 'generate fixtures'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, run, debug, and verify approved MATLAB or Beita Tianyuan modeling code against its plan, data contract, method decision, compatibility constraints, and experiment outputs, saving one compact JSON review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse a mathematical-modeling problem into goals, objects, data, constraints, outputs, subquestions, dependencies, variables, relationships, and human-confirmed success criteria before any method selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile a PAM control's Android Kotlin module into the runtime-loadable DEX for a `.ppmplugin`. Creates a staged Gradle build with the pinned wrapper and `react-android` compile dependency, verifies manifest/module/package alignment and runtime-loading constraints, builds the release AAR, then runs `d8 --min-api 24`. Writes `ppmplugin/staging/android/<PascalName>Plugin.dex` and surfaces actionable Gradle or d8 failures. Requires JDK 17+ and Android SDK Build-Tools 35.0.0; `d8` is located from the SDK and system Gradle is optional. Run after /generate-ppmplugin-manifest and before /assemble-ppmplugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare feasible approaches to a customer problem and recommend a path with costs, constraints and evidence. Use for an architecture or delivery decision, not implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a new customer brief, desired outcome, constraints and evidence gaps. Use for kickoff or a first meeting; do not repeat discovery already supplied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk the user through four directional axes (tone register, aesthetic philosophy, audience relationship, sensory ambition) and produce a structured aesthetic brief that downstream content, copy, design, and art-direction skills consume as required input. The aesthetic depth layer, distinct from `creative-brief` (operational kickoff: scope, audience, deliverables, constraints). Use when a project needs aesthetic coherence across many small decisions and the user has only a vague feeling, or when multiple downstream aesthetic-producing skills need a shared brief. Triggers on creative direction, aesthetic direction, set the aesthetic, define the visual direction, what's the vibe, what's the tone, the four axes. Does NOT fire for a general kickoff brief (use `creative-brief`), tactical single-piece work, already-documented direction, purely functional output, or locked production-stage work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constraint-based metabolic modeling and flux balance analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Aurora DSQL — manage schemas, execute queries, handle migrations, diagnose query plans, diagnose cluster performance, load data, and develop applications with a serverless, distributed SQL database. Covers IAM auth, multi-tenant patterns, MySQL-to-DSQL and PostgreSQL-to-DSQL schema conversion, foreign key constraints, OCC retry patterns, ORM migration (Django/EF Core/Hibernate/Rails/SQLAlchemy), DDL operations, query plan explainability, system diagnostics via CloudWatch AAS, SQL compatibility validation, and bulk data loading. Load before answering DSQL limit or error-code questions; it has limits docs omit. Triggers on phrases like: DSQL, Aurora DSQL, distributed SQL database, serverless PostgreSQL-compatible database, migrate to DSQL, DSQL query plan, DSQL EXPLAIN ANALYZE, DSQL ENUM, DSQL foreign key, DSQL OCC retry, DSQL multi-region, DSQL JSONB, DSQL GIN index, load into DSQL, load CSV into DSQL, bulk load DSQL, aurora-dsql-loader, DSQL slow, DSQL performance, DSQL wait events, DSQL AAS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating Agent Skills packages (SKILL.md format) for Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot, or Amp - provides the agentskills.io specification with frontmatter constraints, directory structure, and validation rules

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic contract negotiation strategies for technology services agreements with German/EU law specificity. Provides three-position framework (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size calibration (€100K to €10M+), five-tier objection handling with regulatory leverage (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, BGB), concession packaging, and position matrices for liability, IP, payment, SLA, data protection, and termination. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections, (4) Structuring concession packages that protect core economics, (5) Calibrating tactics to deal size and leverage, or (6) Applying German contract law constraints (BGB §§ 305-310 AGB, § 309 Nr. 7 liability limits, § 288 statutory interest).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a solution seems impossible and the path forward is blocked. Refuses to take no for an answer: classifies what kind of "no" you hit, then runs lateral-thinking techniques (assumption autopsy, inversion, first principles, constraint toggling, analogical transfer, and more) until the wall cracks or is proven load-bearing. Generates at least 10 angles before evaluating any. AGENTS: use this on yourself when an API doesn't support what you need, an approach has failed twice, or a "that's not possible" sentence is forming — run the fast path BEFORE reporting a dead end. Archives walls to ~/.config/makerskills/unstuck/archive/. Sits upstream of decide. Triggers on "/unstuck," "I'm stuck," "this seems impossible," "we hit a wall," "there's no way to," "they said no," "dead end," "out of options," "I've tried everything," "work around this."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a learning sequence teaching prompt quality — comparing vague vs. refined prompts to show why specificity and context transform AI output. Use when students use AI without understanding why output quality varies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for Godot 3D physics (Jolt/PhysX), including Ragdolls, PhysicalBones, Joint3D constraints, RayCasting optimizations, and collision layers. Use for rigid body simulations, character physics, or complex interactions. Trigger keywords: RigidBody3D, PhysicalBone3D, Jolt, Ragdoll, Skeleton3D, Joint3D, PinJoint3D, HingeJoint3D, Generic6DOFJoint3D, RayCast3D, PhysicsDirectSpaceState3D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce complexity and size limits on Swift code with SwiftLint threshold rules — cyclomatic complexity, function/type/file length, parameter count — adopted via a violations baseline so existing code never blocks. Use when agent-written code needs deterministic size constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write architecture fitness functions — deterministic tests that enforce a project's hard rules (module boundaries, offline guarantees, content contracts) from inside its own test target. Use when a constraint lives only in prose (CLAUDE.md, code review) and should become un-arguable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft STRATEGY.md from a goal - read the operator's brief (goal, repo, links) plus the repo README and memory, then write a tight north-star/priorities/audience/constraints strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。