「debt」の検索結果

Architecture design and governance protocol for system structure, boundaries, contracts, APIs, schemas, migrations, rewrites, and long-lived codebase health. Use when designing or reviewing architecture, planning structural refactors or migrations, governing tech debt, or containing rewrite risk. Keeps the load-bearing spine small, owned, checked, and deletable over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review whether a Clawix UI pattern, visual decision, copy change, or component extraction belongs in canon, debt, exception, or protected-surface scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and interpret Clawix UI geometry, screenshot, protected-surface, and debt-baseline checks without authorizing visual repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement functional Clawix UI wiring while respecting visual mutation boundaries, pattern contracts, protected surfaces, and debt baselines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate the user through reading code stop by stop to pay down understanding debt left by AI tooling. Explicit invocation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tutor the user step by step on a plan, implementation, codebase, or topic to pay down understanding debt left by AI tooling. Explicit invocation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quiz the user on a plan, implementation, or codebase to pay down understanding debt left by AI tooling. Explicit invocation only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Use people-search aggregators and primary public records to find addresses, phone numbers, relatives, age and background on a person, and to audit and remove your own exposure. Use when running a people search or reverse address lookup, tracing a debtor or missing person, building a subject's address history, or removing yourself from broker sites

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spar with the founder as a synthetic cofounder on business questions (revenue, funnel, pricing, fundraising, debt, hiring, runway) with numbered objections and no flattery, arguing to consensus instead of agreeing. Not a coach and not a chatbot. Triggers: "/cofounder", or any strategic business question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level guidance for Flutter production applications: architecture decisions (Clean/Layered/Hexagonal/Feature-First), advanced state management (BLoC/Riverpod/GetX), performance optimization (eliminating jank, memory profiling, reducing rebuild overhead), code review with design pattern enforcement, scalability assessments, native platform integration (MethodChannel/EventChannel/FFI), complex UI challenges (custom render objects, slivers), testing strategies (unit/widget/integration/golden), CI/CD pipeline architecture, build optimization, and accessibility compliance. Triggers: 'architecture decision', 'design pattern', 'performance issue', 'code review', 'production problem', 'scaling concerns', 'best practices', 'technical debt', 'refactoring strategy'. Essential for complex enterprise apps, critical production debugging, architectural refactors, or when choosing between competing technical approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Codescene — codeScene behavioral code analysis including code health scoring, hotspot detection, change coupling analysis, and PR integration for code quality gates. Use when configuring CodeScene for codebase visualization, technical debt prioritization, and automated code review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor legacy codebases, migrate outdated frameworks, and implement gradual modernization. Handles technical debt, dependency updates, and backward compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a comprehensive 20-point code quality audit on a "vibe-coded" codebase that was shipped fast and now needs hardening. Use this skill whenever the user mentions vibe coding, vibe audit, code audit, code review, code cleanup, hardening a prototype, productionizing a codebase, technical debt cleanup, or asks Claude to "audit my code", "review my codebase", "clean up my project", or check a freshly-shipped project for common quality issues. Also use when a user shares a repo and asks what's wrong with it or how to make it production-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Print Peephole's security audit report for this project — current mode, binary integrity, the CWE-mapped decision tally, sec-debt items needing approval, and tamper-evident log-chain status. Use when the user says /sec-audit or asks what Peephole has blocked or flagged.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, analyze, repair, and audit finance three-statement models and operating forecasts. Use when the user invokes $kelly-finance, asks for 财务三表, 三表模型, income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, forecast model, budget model, financial projections, FP&A model, SaaS/unit economics forecast, fundraising model, board finance pack, investor model, model checks, balance-sheet balancing, cash runway, working capital, capex/depreciation schedules, debt schedules, scenario/sensitivity cases, or Excel/Sheets-ready finance outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring strategies, technical debt reduction, architecture modernization, and code quality improvement. Use when refactoring code, modernizing legacy code, reducing complexity, or improving maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Python typing exclusion worker: remove assigned mypy exclusion modules in small scoped batches, fix typing issues, run validation, and produce a structured completion summary. Use when running parallel typing-debt workers or when asked to remove modules from pyproject mypy exclusion overrides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` evaluation stream for contradictions between a flag's configured state and its real traffic: evaluation cliffs on healthy flags, ghost flags (code calling keys that no longer exist), response-distribution shifts with no corresponding flag edit, and flag debt (stale, fully-rolled-out, or dead flags still burning evaluations). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code while preserving observable behavior. Use for targeted technical debt or hotspot work with characterization tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer specializing in code quality, security vulnerabilities, and best practices across multiple languages. Masters static analysis, design patterns, and performance optimization with focus on maintainability and technical debt reduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech health check: documentation, security, architecture, data analysis. Use when user requests project audit, tech debt review, or health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a structured framework for conducting thorough code reviews covering correctness, security, architecture alignment, performance, and technical debt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。