「demand」の検索結果

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI agents with Pydantic AI — tools, capabilities (including on-demand loading), structured output, streaming, testing, and multi-agent patterns. Use when the user mentions Pydantic AI, imports pydantic_ai, or asks to build an AI agent, add tools/capabilities, defer capability loading, stream output, define agents from YAML, or test agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use before /plan-ceo-review or /plan-eng-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build applications and agents with Exa's API Platform: search, contents, answer, context, Agent API, monitors, websets, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, and exa-py / exa-js. Use when choosing Exa endpoints, writing Exa API calls, integrating semantic web search or research into products, or debugging Exa request shapes. Load references/ on demand for endpoint details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a measured semantic core for a brand through official keyword APIs (Yandex Wordstat for RU, Google Ads Keyword Planner / Bing Webmaster worldwide, autocomplete everywhere), commit it as core.json plus a questions.csv, and hand that straight to an open-geo visibility run. Use when the user wants demand research, a semantic core, keyword volume, or "collect the questions and then measure visibility" — no browser and no manual keyword tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Market Research Specialist. Use to analyze target markets, ICP segments, demand patterns, competitive terrain, and strategic whitespace for founder decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

需給分析。信用残高（信用倍率）、空売り比率、投資部門別売買動向から需給バランスを総合判定する。JQuants API v2を使用。

"Solve the newsvendor problem for single-period ordering decisions under uncertain demand. Use this skill when the user needs to determine optimal order quantity for perishable goods, seasonal products, or one-time purchase decisions — even if they say 'how much to order for this season', 'perishable inventory', or 'single-period ordering'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Calculate safety stock levels to buffer against demand and lead time uncertainty. Use this skill when the user needs to set inventory buffers, determine service level trade-offs, or optimize safety stock across SKUs — even if they say 'how much buffer inventory', 'stockout prevention', or 'service level calculation'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an existing codebase in parallel via 7 specialized mapper subagents. Outputs structured findings to docs/codebase/ for persistent cross-session context. Use when onboarding to a brownfield project or when reactive on-demand file reading is too slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand situational awareness — fresh git/PR snapshot plus continuation, distilled into one concrete "next action" suggestion. Use mid-session when you've lost track, after a compaction, or starting a new work block. Trigger on "where was I", "what's next", "progress", "what should I do now", "/progress".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build/test/lint verification pass for this Flutter app — runs codegen, analyze, test, then iOS + Android native builds in parallel, then `dart format`. Does NOT commit anything; leaves the working tree dirty so the user can review and commit on demand. Used at the end of the prd → techspec → tasks → implement-tasks-sequence flow before `pr-review`, and can also be invoked manually when the user says "verify build", "run full verification", or "check everything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Account-based marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill to build a target account list, tier it 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many, size it against sales capacity, turn intent and engagement signals into plays, write the multi-channel orchestration contract each tier runs on, and measure the program in account coverage, penetration and pipeline instead of MQLs. Also triggers on: ABM, account-based marketing, target account list, TAL, named accounts, account tiering, 1:1 ABM, one-to-few, programmatic ABM, account selection, ideal customer profile fit, intent data, buying signals, 6sense, Bombora, Demandbase, account penetration, account coverage, sales and marketing alignment on accounts, enterprise account program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Economist — estimating a demand elasticity or causal treatment effect from observational or experimental data, building a cost-benefit or welfare analysis for a policy or pricing decision, forecasting a macro or market aggregate under stated assumptions, or stress-testing whether a "the data shows X" claim survives a confounding-variable check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Energy Engineer working on building and industrial energy efficiency — running an ASHRAE Level 1/2/3 energy audit, calculating envelope heat loss/gain with the degree-day method, comparing HVAC equipment on SEER/EER/IEER/COP rather than nameplate alone, designing an IPMVP measurement and verification (M&V) plan, or ranking energy conservation measures (ECMs) by savings-to-investment ratio for a capital plan. Distinct from a wind-energy-engineer or solar/PV engineer (own generation-asset design and yield) and from an electrical-engineer (owns utility-scale power delivery and protection) — this role owns the demand side: how much energy a building or process actually needs, and which retrofit reduces that number with numbers that hold up after the fact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Entertainment and Recreation Manager (theme park, arena, recreation facility, tour operation) — planning attraction/facility capacity against attendance forecasts, evaluating a guest safety or ride-operations decision, pricing admission/season-pass programs, or managing seasonal staffing and weather-driven demand swings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical Engineer working in power systems — sizing a service or feeder from NEC demand factors, running a short-circuit study and checking breaker interrupting ratings, computing arc-flash incident energy and assigning a PPE category, checking protective-device coordination (selectivity), or reviewing a single-line diagram before construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Driver/Sales Worker on a direct-store-delivery (DSD) route — negotiating a shelf-facing or planogram change with a store manager, resizing a standing order after a shelf or demand change, deciding whether to pull code-dated product before a stale credit hits, reconciling a route's revenue-per-stop against cost-per-stop, or deciding whether to fight for shelf space back from a competitor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a K-12 Education Administrator (principal/assistant principal/district administrator) — making a school-level policy or resource-allocation decision, handling a discipline or safety incident, evaluating a curriculum or staffing decision, or balancing competing demands from teachers, parents, students, and district requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a demographer — building a cohort-component population projection, reconciling fertility/mortality rate estimates against ACS or vital-statistics counts, judging whether a population trend is real or sampling/measurement noise, sizing a census undercount adjustment, or advising a public agency on age-structure-driven facility or service demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Childcare Worker — checking ratio/headcount compliance across mixed-age groups, deciding whether a fall or minor incident needs a written report versus a verbal mention at pickup, redirecting a behavior problem in an unstructured (non-curriculum) setting, or triaging which of several simultaneous demands (a crying toddler, a fight over a toy, a diaper) gets attention first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。