「drafting」の検索結果

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the BZD mathematical-modeling Skills across problem reading, idea generation, model selection, paper drafting, section checks, final format/AIGC audits and judge-style scoring. Use when a user wants one entry point, an end-to-end competition workflow, the next appropriate Skill, or coordinated processing of a problem and paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FOIA and public records workflows. Use when drafting requests, tracking submissions, checking exemptions, or appealing denials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when drafting GitHub issues for the Positron repository. It provides workflows for searching duplicates, selecting appropriate labels, gathering complete context through questioning, and writing terse, fluff-free issues that precisely describe what is needed or wrong. The skill prepares issues for manual submission by the user. Use this skill when the user asks to draft or prepare an issue for Positron.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for social science academic paper drafting, outlining, diagnosis, review, and revision. Trigger for topic diagnosis, research question refinement, literature review planning, CNKI/Google Scholar literature search-to-Zotero workflows, structured paper reading notes, theoretical framework design, research design critique, draft review, section or paragraph revision, citation and evidence risk checking, causal-claim checking, and pre-submission review. Do not use for purely creative writing or non-academic editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weekly Instagram content plan from a theme, audience, and content pillars. Produces a per-day mix of Reels, carousels, single images, and stories, each with a hook formula, angle, posting time, and primary goal, plus a weekly saves-and-shares goal (the 2026 lever), a story cadence, and a balance check across saves, shares, comments, and follows. Use to plan a week instead of ad-hoc posting. Not for drafting one caption (use ig-caption-writer) or one carousel (use ig-carousel-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize, organize, and normalize messy research materials into an IEEE-ready writing brief before manuscript drafting. Use when Codex needs to process a folder or collection of experiment logs, code files, AI chat exports, idea notes, literature summaries, related-work notes, copied introduction excerpts, Zotero-derived paper summaries, tables, figures, or scattered Markdown/text records and convert them into structured inputs for ieee-writing, ieee-experiment, ieee-citation, ieee-reviewer, or ieee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates new Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documents for significant architectural changes using a consistent template and repository-aware naming and storage guidance. Use when a user or agent decides on an architectural change, needs to document technical rationale, or wants to add a new ADR to the project history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates text in a learned writing voice. Use when drafting content that must match a specific author's style profile extracted by voice-extract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares pull requests by running quality gates, drafting descriptions, and validating tests. Use when completing a feature and ready for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting an IRB or ethics research protocol. Writes Background, Study Design, Sample Size and Statistical Plan in full prose and leaves institution-specific sections as TODO skeletons. Filling an institutional Word form is /fill-protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting a medical research manuscript or any IMRAD section. Runs an 8-phase pipeline from outline to submission-ready draft for original articles, AI validation studies, case reports, meta-analyses, technical notes and more. Checking a draft is /self-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission. Reviews the analysis unit, cohort logic, leakage risks, comparator, validation strategy and reporting-guideline fit. AI-vs-expert benchmarks are /design-ai-benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting a grant or challenge proposal for a radiology or medical AI project, including a Korean government industry-academia plan. Structures significance, innovation, approach, aims, milestones and consortium roles, keeping claims evidence-based and executable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "self-publish", "publish my book", "ISBN", "copyright page", "book metadata", "BISAC", "keywords", "KDP", "IngramSpark", "Draft2Digital", "go wide", "Kindle Unlimited", "print interior", "trim size", "paperback", "ebook", "EPUB", "cover wrap", "spine width", "pricing", "launch plan", "ARC team", "advance readers", "newsletter", "reader magnet", "Amazon ads", "BookBub", "rights", "foreign rights", "audio rights", "film rights", "publishing contract", or wants to take a finished manuscript through production, distribution, launch, and rights management. It owns contracts and rights sales; NOT for permission to quote lyrics, epigraphs, or other material in the book (use editorial-review), or for drafting the blurb or retailer description (use submission).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "revise a chapter", "continuity check", "find inconsistencies", "audit character state", "check timeline consistency", "developmental edit", "structural revision", "reverse outline", "cut a subplot", "revision passes", "what pass next", "pacing check" as a revision pass, "clue check", "cut to a word count", or "length pass", or to prepare existing story material for the next revision pass. NOT for planning book structure (use plot-structure), scene-level craft (use scene-craft), voice consistency (use voice-style), or reconciling a chapter drafted by discovery (use discovery-drafting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides implementation of EU Standard Contractual Clauses under Commission Decision 2021/914 across all four modules (C2C, C2P, P2P, P2C). Covers clause-by-clause completion, Annex I-III drafting, and SCC module selection. Keywords: SCCs, standard contractual clauses, module selection, data transfers, Annex completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides EU Code of Conduct adherence under GDPR Articles 40-41 including EDPB approval requirements, monitoring body accreditation, code drafting, adherence declaration, compliance verification, and complaint handling. Covers sector-specific codes, transnational codes, and Art. 40(3) approval by supervisory authorities. Keywords: code of conduct, Article 40, Article 41, EDPB, monitoring body, adherence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides development of GDPR Article 40-41 codes of conduct for industry sectors including drafting, submission, and monitoring body requirements. Activate when creating industry codes or establishing monitoring bodies. Keywords: codes of conduct, Article 40, Article 41, monitoring body, industry code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from prose, and keep it out of a repo. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to make it sound natural and human, or when auditing a whole docs folder for AI slop. Detects 41 patterns across content, language, style, communication, filler, and rhetoric, including: significance inflation, promotional language, -ing tails, vague attributions, AI vocabulary, copula avoidance, negative parallelisms, false agency, em dash overuse, chatbot artifacts, hedging stacks, staccato drama, and aphorism formulas. Includes voice calibration, a no-fabrication rule, statistical tells, and a draft -> audit -> final rewrite loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a runbook for an operational scenario — an incident an alert fires for, a recurring scheduled task, or a known failure mode on a live service — using a consistent template. Use when writing, drafting, authoring, or updating a runbook for an alert, incident, on-call procedure, scheduled maintenance, or operational SOP. Applies a YAGNI preflight requiring the scenario to be real before producing the runbook. Does not produce feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not record architectural decisions — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。