本文へ移動
cccskills

「eas」の検索結果

6,369 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

维护 easyeda-agent 仓库的 Skill、CLI、daemon、connector 与文档,补回可复用经验并组织验证和 Git 贡献。 Develop and contribute to the linked automation repository; use easyeda-agent for circuit design operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhoushoujianwork/easyeda-agent6552026年10月13日 更新

通过本地 easyeda CLI、daemon 和连接器操作嘉立创EDA专业版(EasyEDA Pro):依据需求与真实器件数据设计原理图、布局布线 PCB,并回读连接、几何、DRC 与保存结果。适用于已有工程操作及参数化电路设计。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhoushoujianwork/easyeda-agent6552026年10月13日 更新

OTA updates with CodePush, EAS Build, and release configurations. Use when configuring OTA updates, EAS Build, or managing release configs for React Native.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5752026年10月12日 更新

Create a release checklist and GitHub issue for an R package. Use when the user asks to "create a release checklist" or "start a release" for an R package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

posit-dev/skills5422026年10月8日 更新

Release, publish, CalVer tag push, npm publish, 배포, 릴리즈 for senpi. Use for the canonical release flow, GitHub tag/release publication, and npm publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

code-yeongyu/senpi4792026年10月13日 更新

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4442026年10月9日 更新

Standardizes release approvals with GitHub-aware checklists and deployment gates. Use before releasing to production to verify all gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Decode a commercial lease before signing or renewing -- true all-in occupancy cost (base rent plus NNN/CAM plus escalations), the clauses that hurt small tenants (personal guarantees, relocation, restoration), and the negotiation asks landlords routinely grant. The lease is most SMBs' biggest fixed cost and least-read document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3402026年10月2日 更新

Use when preparing a release, tagging a version, or when user says "release", "tag", "ship it", "push to production" - ensures all release artifacts are verified before tagging to avoid the retag-four-times failure pattern

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

harperreed/dotfiles3352026年10月3日 更新

Guides implementation of technical, contractual, and organisational supplementary measures for international data transfers per EDPB Recommendations 01/2020. Covers encryption, pseudonymisation, split processing, audit rights, transparency obligations, and internal policies. Keywords: supplementary measures, encryption, pseudonymisation, EDPB recommendations, transfer safeguards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Manages backup and archive data under retention schedules and erasure obligations. Covers the technical infeasibility exception for backup deletion, backup cycle alignment with retention periods, restore-and-delete procedures, and interim protective measures during backup retention. Activate for backup deletion, archive erasure, backup retention, restore and delete, technical infeasibility queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

hickey

無料

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

srid/haskell-flake2402026年10月11日 更新

Think and work like an expert Infectious Disease Specialist. Use when a task calls for Infectious Disease Specialist judgment. Reasons from the host-pathogen-antimicrobial triangle, source control, and local resistance through IDSA/CLSI M100 breakpoints, PK/PD targets (vancomycin AUC24 400-600, beta-lactam time-above-MIC), and diagnostics like MALDI-TOF, BioFire panels, and galactomannan while treating colonization-versus-infection, blood-culture contaminants, and noninfectious fever mimics (drug fever, IRIS) as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agents2052026年10月3日 更新

Release moi-computer to npm — verify locally, hand off to the gated GitHub Actions workflow, then verify the published package. Defaults to a `next` preview; pass `stable` for a `latest` release. Use when the user asks to publish, release, ship a version, or cut a dev preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

molefrog/moi1832026年10月13日 更新

Render Rove's recent releases as a self-contained, Rove-styled HTML page (Chinese by default). Reads shipped notes from packages/rove/CHANGELOG.md + git tags, filters to user-facing changes, and emits one standalone .html file in the `claude` theme (terracotta on near-black, JetBrains Mono, terminal chrome). Use when the user asks for a "release page", "发版速览", "recent release html", "把发版做成网页", or wants to share/post what changed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月14日 更新

Draft Rove release notes as Changesets. Writes user-facing entries as `.changeset/*.md` files for `@sma1lboy/rove` (consumed into `packages/rove/CHANGELOG.md` at release time). Use when the user asks for "changelog", "release notes", "what changed", "add a changeset", or before cutting a version. Enforces Rove's no-soft-wrap rule so GitHub release pages render flowing text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sma1lboy/rove1712026年10月14日 更新

Generate release notes and changelogs from git commits, feature lists, or project updates. Use when a user asks to generate a changelog, create release notes, summarize recent changes, draft a CHANGELOG entry, or prepare release documentation from git history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TerminalSkills/skills1662026年10月14日 更新

Expert in crafting launch narratives - product launches, feature releases, company announcements, and milestone communications. Covers launch timing, narrative arc, channel strategy, and the art of creating buzz. Knows how to turn a release into an event, and when quiet launches are better than splash. Use when "product launch, launch story, announcement, feature release, launch narrative, go live, release announcement, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity1652026年1月22日 更新

World-class expertise in measuring, attributing, and optimizing AI-generated content performance. Combining data science rigor with content strategy intelligence to answer the questions traditional content analytics can't: Is AI content performing? Which AI variations convert? What's the true ROI of AI vs traditional content creation? This isn't vanity metrics for robots. This is the discipline of proving AI content drives business outcomes - and using that data to make AI content systems better, faster, and more profitable. Built on the principles of companies like Jasper, Copy.ai, and Notion who've scaled AI content operations with measurement as the foundation. Use when "ai content performance, ai content analytics, measure ai content, ai content roi, ai vs human content, ai content attribution, ai content testing, ai variation testing, ai content dashboard, ai content metrics, prompt performance, ai content conversion, ai content quality score, content velocity, ai content efficiency, ai-content, analytics, measurement, attribution, roi, ab-testing, performance, optimization, data-driven, content-analytics" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity1652026年1月22日 更新

analytics

無料

The practice of collecting, analyzing, and acting on data to drive product decisions. Great analytics isn't about dashboards—it's about insights that lead to action. Every metric should answer a question that changes behavior. This skill covers event tracking, metrics design, dashboards, user behavior analysis, and data-driven decision making. The best analytics teams measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. Use when "analytics, metrics, tracking, dashboard, funnel, cohort, retention, events, KPI, measure, data, insights, conversion, engagement, analytics, metrics, data, dashboards, tracking, funnels, cohorts, KPIs, insights" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

omer-metin/skills-for-antigravity1652026年1月22日 更新

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

swaylq/master-skill1552026年9月6日 更新

launch

無料

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, or release strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'launch,' 'Product Hunt,' 'feature release,' 'announcement,' 'go-to-market,' 'beta launch,' 'early access,' 'waitlist,' 'product update,' 'how do I launch this,' 'launch checklist,' 'GTM plan,' or 'we're about to ship.' Use this whenever someone is preparing to release something publicly. For ongoing marketing after launch, see marketing-ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

capture

無料

Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

analytics

無料

When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新