「escalation」の検索結果

SOC alert triage, incident playbook automation, escalation workflows, shift reporting, and SOC KPI tracking

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems from a maintainer-authored or maintainer-sanitized NIS2 engineering evidence inventory. Supports essential or important entities, critical-sector services, managed service providers, supply-chain dependencies, and cybersecurity incident escalation obligations without ingesting raw code, logs, runbooks, tickets, provider documents, or other operational free text. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wiring a verify-then-fix loop around a code-editing LLM agent. The agent edits → runs lint/test → reads the output → fixes → re-runs, bounded by an iteration cap and an escalation rule. Activates whenever a coder agent has a verifiable success criterion (exit code, type-checker output, failing assertion) and the user wants the agent to converge to "green" on its own. Framework-agnostic — wraps Aider's `--auto-lint`/`--auto-test`, an OpenHands SWE-Bench loop, a manual LangGraph cycle, or Claude Code's bash tool just the same.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit applications for AI prompt injection, agent security, and LLM permission boundary vulnerabilities. Use when the user mentions 'prompt injection,' 'LLM security,' 'AI security,' 'jailbreak,' 'indirect prompt injection,' 'prompt leaking,' 'AI red team,' 'LLM vulnerabilities,' 'AI input validation,' 'system prompt extraction,' 'agent security,' 'MCP security,' 'AI permissions,' 'AI privilege escalation,' or needs to secure any application with AI features, AI agents, or LLM integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when attacking AWS/Azure/GCP cloud — IAM/identity privilege escalation, IMDS/metadata SSRF, Entra device-code & PRT theft, GCP impersonation chains, Kubernetes/container escape, IaC/CI-CD federation abuse

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running a full red-team engagement end-to-end — initial access, persistence, privilege escalation, defense evasion, C2 infrastructure, EDR bypass, living-off-the-land

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze historical construction costs for benchmarking, trend analysis, and estimating calibration. Compare projects, track escalation, identify patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a three-tier codebase audit (git history, targeted scans, full review) with gating. Use when auditing a codebase before release or after incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production incident response automation. Reads logs, checks recent deploys, identifies root cause, suggests fixes, drafts incident comms, creates post-mortem templates. Severity classification (SEV1-4), escalation paths, status page updates. Generates incident-report.md with timeline, root cause, impact assessment, remediation steps, and prevention measures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a commercial lease before signing or renewing -- true all-in occupancy cost (base rent plus NNN/CAM plus escalations), the clauses that hurt small tenants (personal guarantees, relocation, restoration), and the negotiation asks landlords routinely grant. The lease is most SMBs' biggest fixed cost and least-read document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweep a contracts folder and extract every renewal date, auto-renew clause, notice window, and price-escalation term into a renewal calendar -- then create calendar reminders ahead of each notice deadline via Cowork's calendar write tools. The skill that stops auto-renewals from ambushing you.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IDOR / BOLA hunting - two-account methodology, identifier discovery and UUID leak chaining, the trusted-identifier test, GraphQL node and nested-object IDOR, cross-tenant escalation, write and delete operations. Bounded ID sampling, never range sweeps. Wiki-first, FIND schema output. Trigger on IDOR, BOLA, broken access control, object level authorization, cross-tenant, "read another user's data", "swap the id", or any API path or parameter carrying a numeric ID, UUID, or account identifier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized multi-stage attack-path planning and orchestration spanning reconnaissance, initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and reporting. Entry point for full engagements and cross-phase operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide comprehensive techniques for attacking Microsoft Active Directory environments. Covers reconnaissance, credential harvesting, Kerberos attacks, lateral movement, privilege escalation, and domain dominance for red team operations and penetration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vendor breach notification cascade management per GDPR Article 33(2). Covers processor-to-controller notification without undue delay, escalation paths, coordinated multi-party breach response, liability allocation, and regulatory notification coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages responses to regulatory complaints lodged with supervisory authorities under GDPR Article 77, covering internal escalation procedures, DPA response coordination, remediation tracking, and compliance documentation. Activate for regulatory complaint, supervisory authority complaint, Art. 77, DPA response, ICO complaint queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit follow-up and verification processes including follow-up scheduling, remediation effectiveness testing, finding closure criteria, re-testing procedures, status reporting, and escalation of unremediated findings. Implements IIA Standard 2500 monitoring requirements and ISO 19011 follow-up guidance for privacy audit engagements. Keywords: audit follow-up, verification testing, finding closure, remediation effectiveness, re-testing, follow-up audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit SLOs, SLIs, alert rules, incident response steps, escalation paths, postmortems, operational runbooks, and customer-impact communication. Use when defining production reliability, preparing launch readiness, responding to an outage, writing a runbook, tuning alerts, or closing the loop after an incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design short cinematic encounters that move from calm observation to an impossible close appearance, a readable startle response, and a restrained truce gesture for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when a user wants fantasy-versus-technology contrast, cockpit or window eyelines, pursuit compressed into 4–15 seconds, non-lethal escalation, identity-reference continuity, or a tense scene that resolves through performance instead of injury or dialogue exposition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。