本文へ移動
cccskills

「eth」の検索結果

5,640 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Use when reviewing scripts, client components, bundles, or runtime behavior related to Use modern array and object methods. Inspect both source code and the browser execution path so fixes target the real bottleneck or bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fission-AI/OpenSpec7.2万2026年10月12日 更新

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

coreyhaines31/marketingskills5.5万2026年10月14日 更新

Required bmod metadata. Never invoke this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD5.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD5.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Test a product concept with Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions, ending in a complete PRFAQ document. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmad-code-org/BMAD-METHOD5.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘, revisión de literatura, metaanálisis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills5.2万2026年10月14日 更新

Answer questions about history, habits and past decisions by reasoning over Hindsight memory. Use when asked what was decided about something, how something is usually done, what changed over time, or what is known about a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

vectorize-io/hindsight4.9万2026年10月13日 更新

Prepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills4.9万2026年10月12日 更新

Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/orm and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version line, or to find stale contributor PRs. Applies the criteria in docs/oss/pr-triage.md. Read-only by default — it reports verdicts and does not close PRs, post comments, or approve workflow runs unless the maintainer asks for that separately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

prisma/orm4.8万2026年10月13日 更新

Validates whether an API request is correct based on provided inputs (method, URL, headers, body, auth, query params).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills4.8万2026年10月14日 更新

Query Ondo tokenized US stock data on Binance Web3. Covers: supported stock token list, RWA metadata (company info, attestation reports), market and per-asset trading status (with corporate action codes for earnings, dividends, splits), real-time on-chain data (token price, holders, circulating supply, market cap), US stock fundamentals (P/E, dividend yield, 52-week range), and token K-Line/candlestick charts. Use this skill when users ask about: - Tokenized stock price, holders, or on-chain data for specific tickers - Whether a stock token is tradable, paused, or halted - Ondo RWA token list or which US stocks are available on-chain - Corporate actions affecting a token (dividends, stock splits, earnings halt) - Stock token K-Line or candlestick chart data - Comparing on-chain token price vs US stock price NOT for general crypto tokens (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.) — use query-token-info for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ccxt/ccxt4.4万2026年10月13日 更新

Binance Onchain Pay enables users to buy cryptocurrency with fiat (e.g., EUR, USD) or send existing crypto from their Binance account directly to any external on-chain wallet address in a single flow—no manual withdrawal needed. Enables partners to integrate crypto buying services: - payment-method-list: Get available payment methods (Card, P2P, Google Pay, Apple Pay, etc.) with limits for a fiat/crypto pair - trading-pairs: List all supported fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies - estimated-quote: Get real-time price quote including exchange rate, fees, and estimated crypto amount - pre-order: Create a buy order and get redirect URL to Binance payment flow - order: Query order status and details (processing, completed, failed, etc.) - crypto-network: Get supported blockchain networks with withdraw fees and limits - p2p/trading-pairs: List P2P-specific trading pairs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ccxt/ccxt4.4万2026年10月13日 更新

PluginEval quality methodology, covering dimensions, rubrics, and scoring formulas. Use this skill when understanding how plugin quality is measured, when interpreting a low score on a specific dimension, when deciding how to improve a skill's triggering accuracy or orchestration fitness, when setting score thresholds for your marketplace, or when explaining quality badges to external partners like Neon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Set up Prometheus for comprehensive metric collection, storage, and monitoring of infrastructure and applications. Use when implementing metrics collection, setting up monitoring infrastructure, or configuring alerting systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wshobson/agents4.1万2026年10月12日 更新

Look up Microsoft API references, find working code samples, and verify SDK code is correct. Use when working with Azure SDKs, .NET libraries, or Microsoft APIs—to find the right method, check parameters, get working examples, or troubleshoot errors. Catches hallucinated methods, wrong signatures, and deprecated patterns by querying official docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月14日 更新

Refactoring using Extract Methods in Java Language

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/awesome-copilot4万2026年10月14日 更新

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills3.4万2026年8月31日 更新

Build one company memory from a SQL database, a support ticket export and a folder of documents, linked into one graph by cognee, then answer questions that need several of those sources together. Use when someone wants to connect their company's database, tickets and docs, or asks who owns, decided or is handling something across them. Runs locally; reads the sources, writes only to cognee's memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

topoteretes/cognee3.2万2026年10月14日 更新

Run `gbrain skillpack-check` to produce an agent-readable JSON health report for the gbrain install. Wraps `gbrain doctor` + `gbrain apply-migrations --list` so a host agent (your OpenClaw's morning-briefing, any OpenClaw cron) can see at a glance whether the skillpack needs attention. Use when the user asks "is gbrain healthy?", when a cron fires a morning check, or proactively when something seems off (jobs not running, brain not updating, autopilot silent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

garrytan/gbrain3.1万2026年10月13日 更新

Plan resource capacity — workload analysis and utilization forecasting. Use when heading into quarterly planning, the team feels overallocated and you need the numbers, deciding whether to hire or deprioritize, or stress-testing whether upcoming projects fit the people you have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins3万2026年10月12日 更新

Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before drafting a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins3万2026年10月12日 更新

QA an analysis before sharing -- methodology, accuracy, and bias checks. Use when reviewing an analysis before a stakeholder presentation, spot-checking calculations and aggregation logic, verifying a SQL query's results look right, or assessing whether conclusions are actually supported by the data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins3万2026年10月12日 更新