「fea」の検索結果

Design a tdmcp feature into an implementable spec before any code is written — choose the layer, define the Zod input schema, lay out the TD network topology, plan the bridge/Python approach, sketch a UI wireframe when relevant, and list probe-first risks + the test plan. Use whenever a tdmcp feature idea needs a design/wireframe/spec, or when someone asks to plan/scope/architect a new tool, generator, effect, control, or AI prompt for the TouchDesigner MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature development workflow with exploration, architecture, implementation, and review phases. Use for implementing new features or significant changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide requirement writing, user story creation, and feature specification. Use when: writing requirements, user stories, issues, feature planning. Keywords: requirement, user story, issue, feature, specification, 需求, 功能規劃, 規格.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vets whether to build a feature from scratch, use an existing free/open-source solution, or pay for a third-party API/service. Use this whenever the user asks Claude to implement, add, integrate, or write code for a feature or capability, especially one that sounds like it could already be a solved problem (auth, payments, scraping, animation, comment/DM automation, video/image generation, search, notifications, etc.), even if the user doesn't explicitly ask "should I build or buy this." Make sure to trigger this before writing non-trivial implementation code for any feature-level capability, not just when the user asks about libraries directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan implementation for a feature or task. Two modes — fast (single quick plan) or full (richer plan with optional git branch/worktree flow). Use when user says "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan implementation for a feature or task. Two modes — fast (single quick plan) or full (richer plan with optional git branch/worktree flow). Use when user says "plan", "new feature", "start feature", "create tasks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a product launch, feature announcement, release strategy, or go-to-market plan. Also use when the user mentions 'launch plan', 'go to market', 'GTM', 'Product Hunt', 'beta launch', 'how do I launch', 'pre-launch', 'launch checklist', 'distribution plan', 'release strategy', 'feature announcement', or is about to ship something and needs a distribution plan. Even vague requests like 'I'm almost done building, what now?' or 'how do I get users?' should trigger this skill. Make sure to use this whenever someone is planning ANY kind of product or feature release, even if they don't say 'launch' explicitly — if they're thinking about getting something in front of users, this is the skill. This is the STRATEGIC planner — for operational platform submissions and directory launches, see /startup-launcher instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design feature stores for ML systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-feature-store related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before writing code for any feature touching auth, payments, credentials, tokens, sessions, file upload, user data, untrusted input, deserialization, network endpoints, or data deletion. Scope by that surface, not the task label — a research/experimental/local-only feature with none of it doesn't need this. Invoke it, record answers inline in the design doc or PR description, then write the code. Skipping this is how auth bypass, token leakage, and delete-the-wrong-record bugs ship. If the feature touches any of those surfaces and this hasn't run, the design is incomplete — do not proceed to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize a VCSDD feature pipeline. Creates the .vcsdd/features/<name>/ directory tree, sets mode (strict|lean), and activates the feature. Must be run before any other VCSDD command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate acceptance criteria and feature completion. Use when checking if features pass, validating test results, verifying acceptance criteria, or determining feature completion status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit top-level documentation (README, SPEC, PRODUCT) against recent git history to find drift shipped features missing from docs or features listed as upcoming that already landed. Proposes minimal edits, creates a branch, and opens a PR. Use when asked to review docs for accuracy, after major feature merges, or on a periodic schedule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a full feature in this Flutter repository that includes backend or storage data flow: read API schema, create DTOs, map DTOs to entities, add Riverpod use cases, connect feature state, and render UI data. Use when a task goes beyond a screen and needs real data integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new Flutter screen in this repository using the existing feature structure, AutoRoute setup, Riverpod state pattern, and code generation workflow. Use when adding a new page, route, stateful screen, or feature folder in this template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What every delivered app must DO — anti-placeholder, complete features, working forms, psnotify notifications, feature flags, embarrassingly-easy UX, the feature catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent exploration-to-PR pipeline for safely exploring, fixing, and shipping a feature or CLI. Use when the user says: "explore X", "test and ship X", "run the pipeline on X", "run /feature-pipeline on X", "let's properly investigate X", "stress-test X and file issues", or "take X through the full pipeline." Also triggers on: "find what's broken in X", "test X end-to-end", "do a sandbox review of X", "file issues for X and fix them." Do NOT use for single-file bug fixes or one-off edits — the overhead is only justified when exploration, planning approval, and CI watching all matter. Manages state via scripts/state.sh (jq required). Five phases: LIGHTER explores → ORCHESTRATOR drafts PR → HEAVIER plans (user approves first) → ORCHESTRATOR commits → HEAVIER sandbox review → LIGHTER iterates CI → LIGHTER drift check + summary. Four mandatory stop hooks (M1–M4) gate each phase transition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) in Markdown format. Use when users want to create a PRD, spec out a feature, document requirements, or plan new functionality. Triggers on requests like "create a PRD", "write requirements for", "spec out this feature", or "document this feature idea".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defeats control-flow-flattening obfuscation by identifying the dispatcher/state- variable structure and reconstructing the original control flow so the logic becomes readable. Activates for requests to defeat control-flow flattening, deobfuscate an OLLVM-flattened function, or recover original control flow from a dispatcher loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product Owner - scans codebase and creates or amends GitHub issues with PRD. Use when: PRD, feature, issue, create issue, amend issue, what should we build, plan feature, design feature, scope, requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates EditMode and PlayMode tests using NUnit, mapped from GDD Gherkin scenarios. Use when writing tests, validating features, ensuring code quality, or verifying behavior after changes. Triggers on requests like "write tests for this", "test the health system", "add unit tests", "verify this works", "add PlayMode tests", "test this feature", "write integration tests", "make sure this doesn't break", "add test coverage", "TDD this feature", or any task involving test creation, test-driven development, or quality assurance. Maps Given/When/Then scenarios directly to test methods using NUnit assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。