「fid」の検索結果

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users de-risk new product bets by testing core assumptions, building low-fidelity prototypes, and gathering high-signal evidence before investing heavy engineering resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users convert massive volumes of qualitative and quantitative feedback into high-confidence product decisions through rigorous synthesis and internal immersion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users master the high-stakes communication required to navigate executive reviews, board meetings, and strategic decision-making with clarity and confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate all SAST vulnerability results from the sast/ folder into a single final report ranked by severity and confidentiality impact. Reads all *-results.md files and produces sast/final-report.md. Run after all vulnerability detection skills complete. Use when asked to generate a final report, consolidate findings, or summarize security results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review, and repeats. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Identical to greploop, but triggers reviews by tagging @greptile-apps, which bypasses Greptile's file-count limit on huge PRs that the plain @greptile mention refuses to review. Use when the user wants to fully optimize a large PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules as hypotheses: falsifiable tests, confidence updates, graduate or kill. Triggers: experiment, hypothesis, prove, test rule, validate methodology, evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review for PRs or staged changes. >80% confidence threshold. Verdict: APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT. Triggers: review, pr, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic trust sweep of persistent memory and durable knowledge notes - re-verifies environment-dependent claims against the live environment, stamps last_verified + confidence, and proposes archiving drifted entries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing the response to an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) revise-and-resubmit. AERJ R&Rs come back through the handling editor and multiple masked reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watch a rendered video (whole file or specific ranges) at a chosen fidelity and emit a timestamp-keyed observation report. Observation only — no edits, no verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider waterfall lead enrichment. Takes an email (+ optional name) and returns person + company data by cross-referencing cheap APIs first, using expensive AI agents only as fallback. Cost-efficient (~$0.04-$0.10/lead) with confidence scoring and full error visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lead qualification engine with conversational intake. Asks structured questions to understand your qualification criteria, generates a reusable qualification prompt, then batch-enriches leads via Apify LinkedIn scraping and scores them with parallel processing. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning to CSV or whatever output format the user prefers. Supports calibration mode for prompt refinement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Simulink model is incompatible with Simulink Design Verifier (sldvcompat returns false, or an SLDV analysis errors out on an unsupported construct) and needs to be made analyzable. Diagnoses the incompatibility, applies the matching fix to a copy, and confirms the copy is compatible; optionally raises confidence the fix preserved behavior via a back-to-back consistency replay (agreement on the generated tests, not a proof of equivalence). Do NOT use for running test generation, design error detection, or requirement verification themselves — only for making a model compatible so those can proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nominates and assesses CRISPR off-target sites genome-wide. Enumerates candidate sites by mismatch and bulge tolerance with Cas-OFFinder/CRISPRitz, ranks them with the published CFD score (SpCas9-only, relative ranker) or MIT/CRISTA/energy models, runs variant-aware screening against gnomAD/individual genomes (CRISPRme), and frames the empirical genome-wide discovery assays (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq, CHANGE-seq, DISCOVER-seq, Digenome-seq) and high-fidelity nuclease choice (HiFi Cas9, Sniper-Cas9, eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1). Use when assessing guide RNA specificity, choosing among candidate guides, screening a therapeutic guide against population variation, or planning empirical off-target validation. Distinguishes predicted vs detected vs validated. On-target activity scoring and deaminase (Cas-independent) base/prime-editor off-targets are separate skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and ranks guide RNAs (sgRNAs) for CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a gene knockout by scanning a target for PAM sites (NGG SpCas9, NNGRRT SaCas9, TTTV Cas12a, NG SpCas9-NG, near-PAMless SpRY), enumerating candidate spacers, applying hard filters (Pol-III TTTT terminator, 5' G, GC), ranking on-target activity with the context-appropriate model (Rule Set 2/Azimuth for U6/lentiviral, CRISPRscan for T7/embryo, DeepHF for high-fidelity variants, DeepCpf1 for Cas12a), and predicting the indel/frameshift outcome (Bae out-of-frame score, inDelphi, FORECasT, Lindel). Use when selecting sgRNAs to knock out a gene, choosing a nuclease/PAM for a constrained locus, picking which exon to target, or shortlisting guides before an off-target check. Off-target specificity, base/prime editing, and HDR donors are separate skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query protein-protein and gene interaction databases (STRING, BioGRID, IntAct, SIGNOR, Reactome, HuRI, HuMAP, OmniPath, ConsensusPathDB, DIP). Use when building PPI networks, choosing between physical vs functional vs genetic interactions, signed/directed vs undirected, high-throughput vs curated, picking confidence thresholds, aggregating across resources, or navigating license constraints. Encodes the database decision matrix, STRING v12 channel semantics, OmniPath as meta-database, SIGNOR for signed signaling, and per-resource rate limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull pre-computed ortholog calls from public databases (OrthoDB, Ensembl Compara, OMA browser, eggNOG, PANTHER, KEGG Orthology, HomoloGene) via their REST APIs. Use when orthologs are already curated upstream, when the question is "what is the X ortholog of Y" rather than "how to infer orthology de novo", when batch-mapping gene IDs across species, or when comparing the resources for consensus calls. Encodes confidence-level semantics, 1:1 vs 1:many vs many:many, HomoloGene deprecation, and when to defect to de novo computation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。