Provider-independent motion graphics direction for AI agents producing title sequences, lower thirds, explainer graphics, product UI overlays, social ads, kinetic typography, diagrams, data callouts, brand films, and video post. Use when planning, prompting, storyboarding, specifying, implementing, reviewing, or QAing motion graphics across live footage, generated video, UI capture, data visualization, brand systems, typography, accessibility, claim integrity, runtime handoff, and iteration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
calesthio/generative-media-skills☆ 2022026年7月14日 更新
Assesses genetic health of populations for conservation using effective population size estimation (GONE2 for recent Ne trajectory, NeEstimator for contemporary Ne, Stairway Plot 2 and PSMC for historical Ne), F-statistics (hierfstat), runs of homozygosity (detectRUNS), and genetic diversity metrics. Use when estimating effective population size, detecting inbreeding or bottlenecks, or assessing genetic diversity in threatened species from microsatellite or SNP data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills☆ 2012026年7月2日 更新
Installs 425 bioinformatics skills covering sequence analysis, RNA-seq, single-cell, variant calling, metagenomics, structural biology, and 56 more categories. Use when setting up bioinformatics capabilities or when a bioinformatics task requires specialized skills not yet installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills☆ 2012026年7月2日 更新
Pull metrics from analytics dashboards and internal web tools with Firecrawl browser. Use when the user needs dashboard reporting, cross-platform metric summaries, authenticated analytics extraction, date-range reports, or structured metrics from web dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows☆ 1922026年8月21日 更新
Define, track, and act on QA metrics: test coverage percentage, flakiness rate, defect escape rate, MTTR, test execution time trends, automation ROI, quality gates, and SLAs for test suites. Includes metric formulas, realistic targets by company stage, and the action to take when each metric goes red. Use when: "QA metrics," "test metrics," "quality KPIs," "test health," "flakiness rate," "defect escape rate." Not for: building the dashboard UI (Allure/Grafana) — use qa-dashboard; measuring coverage gaps and mutation score — use coverage-analysis. Related: qa-dashboard, coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, release-readiness, quality-postmortem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
petrkindlmann/qa-skills☆ 1802026年6月11日 更新
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch☆ 1612026年10月7日 更新
Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Anti-Autoresearch☆ 1612026年10月7日 更新
产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
swaylq/master-skill☆ 1552026年9月6日 更新
供应链与生产运营 (供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后 just-in-case、多源、近岸/友岸的回摆;精益派反驳崩的是『假精益』——单一来源+砍库存不砍变异) ⇄ 服务水平 vs 库存成本(安全库存/报童模型/ABC-XYZ 的经典取舍,牛鞭效应放大上游波动) ⇄ 成本导向压价 vs 供应商共生开发(Kraljic 分级、丰田供应商协会式长期共生 vs 年降指标与竞价) ⇄ 一个数 vs 各部门各算各的(S&OP/IBP 的本质是跨职能对齐到一套数字与一份产销计划))**; (b) 工具栈(此行的工具是『系统+方法』的混合) — ERP/MRP(SAP S/4HANA PP·MM、Oracle、用友·金蝶、Odoo、NetSuite)、APS 高级计划排程(Kinaxis RapidResponse、o9、Blue Yonder、SAP IBP、OMP、Siemens Opcenter APS)、MES/车间执行(Siemens Opcenter、Rockwell FactoryTalk、黑湖智造)、WMS/TMS、需求预测(统计模型 + Nixtla StatsForecast/Prophet、FVA 预测增值分析)、运筹优化与仿真(OR-Tools、Gurobi、Pyomo、AnyLogic、FlexSim、SimPy)、供应链风险与多级可视(Resilinc、Everstream、Interos)、分析层(SQL/Python pandas/Power BI)、以及纸笔工具(价值流图 VSM、A3、看板、标准作业票)—— 选型决策树的关键分岔是 MTS/MTO/ATO/ETO 履行模式与需求变异度,而非厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 利特尔法则(在制品 = 产出率 × 流动时间)、瓶颈与非瓶颈、缓冲三态(库存/时间/产能缓冲)、解耦点(客户订单渗透点 CODP)、牛鞭效应、takt time 节拍与产线平衡、OEE 与六大损失、muda·mura·muri 三种浪费、自働化 jidoka 与安灯、防错 poka-yoke、SMED 快速换模换出小批量、平准化 heijunka、PDCA 与丰田改善型 Toyota Kata、DMAIC 与 Cpk 过程能力、报童模型与安全库存公式、ABC-XYZ 分级; (d) 工作流/SOP — 跑一轮月度 S&OP(需求评审→供应评审→预 S&OP→执行 S&OP)、做需求预测与预测误差复盘(MAPE/WMAPE/bias/FVA)、设定库存分级与安全库存、MRP 跑批与例外消息处理(缺料齐套与 MRP 神经质)、瓶颈识别与 DBR 排产、价值流图现状图→未来图→改善计划、新品导入 NPI 与多级 BOM/ECN 工程变更、供应商选择与开发(RFQ→审厂→APQP/PPAP→量产→年度绩效)、断料应急与交期承诺(ATP/CTP)、循环盘点与库存准确率; (e) 知识正典(en/ja 一手极厚,中译齐全) — 《目标 The Goal》Goldratt(TOC 小说体奠基)、《丰田生产方式》大野耐一、《改变世界的机器》Womack·Jones·Roos(MIT IMVP 研究)、《精益思想 Lean Thinking》Womack & Jones、《丰田模式 The Toyota Way》Liker、《工厂物理学 Factory Physics》Hopp & Spearman(排队论视角的运营科学)、《学习观察 Learning to See》Rother & Shook(VSM)、《丰田套路 Toyota Kata》Rother、Spear & Bowen 的 HBR 1999《Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System》、Lee/Padmanabhan/Whang 1997《The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains》、Ptak & Smith 的 DDMRP、Orlicky 的 MRP、Chopra & Meindl 的供应链管理教材、Deming《转危为安 Out of the Crisis》、Sheffi《The Resilient Enterprise》、ASCM/APICS 的 SCOR 参考模型与 CPIM/CSCP 知识体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — 大野耐一(TPS 立法者)、新乡重夫(SMED/防错)、Eliyahu Goldratt(TOC 创立者)、W. Edwards Deming(变异与系统观)、James Womack & Daniel Jones(把 TPS 译成西方可学的『精益』)、Jeffrey Liker(丰田模式学术化)、Mike Rother(VSM 与改善型)、Wallace Hopp & Mark Spearman(工厂物理学)、Hau Lee(斯坦福,牛鞭效应与 Triple-A 供应链)、Yossi Sheffi(MIT,韧性)、Carol Ptak & Chad Smith(DDMRP)、David Simchi-Levi(MIT,风险敞口指数)、Steven Spear(TPS 的 DNA)、以及中文圈的供应链实务作者(刘宝红等); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — JIT 是不是 2021 全球断链的元凶(精益派反驳:崩的是单一来源+砍库存不砍变异的『假精益』);西方学精益的高失败率(只搬工具不搬思维,精益在很多工厂沦为裁员的代号);六西格玛黑带官僚化与扼杀创新之争;TOC 派与精益派互相攻击(Goldratt 讽刺精益是等浪费自己浮现);预测无用论(需求驱动派说预测必然错、要靠缓冲吸收)vs 统计预测派;控制塔/数字孪生/AI 预测的过度承诺与高项目失败率;中国制造的年降与内卷式压价 vs 供应商共生;近岸·友岸外包是真实产能转移还是政治叙事; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **精益/TPS 派(丰田血统:大野-新乡→Womack/Jones/Liker/Rother,信全局消除浪费与人的改善能力)** vs **约束理论 TOC 派(Goldratt:系统产出只由瓶颈决定,聚焦五步、DBR、缓冲管理)** vs **统计质量/六西格玛派(Deming-Juran-Shewhart→GE/Motorola,信减少变异与过程能力)** vs **运营科学/工厂物理学派(Hopp & Spearman:用排队论与数学定律解释,认为精益与 TOC 都是特例)** vs **需求驱动/DDMRP 派(Ptak & Smith:预测不可靠,靠战略解耦缓冲)** vs **韧性/风险派(Sheffi、Simchi-Levi:效率之外必须为断链设计)**。不含: 跨境电商卖家的发货与头程物流(已由 cross-border-ecommerce 覆盖)、纯采购的商务谈判技巧、企业级 ERP 的代码实施与二次开发、通用项目管理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
swaylq/master-skill☆ 1552026年9月6日 更新
Computes a numeric or categorical answer to a quantitative data-science question by cleaning and analyzing local data files (CSV, Excel, TSV, and scientific formats .npz/.fits/.h5) with pandas, numpy, and scipy. Use whenever a task ships its own dataset (in whatever local directory it provides) and asks you to derive a value via statistical, geospatial, temporal, ratio, percentage, growth-rate, correlation, signal-processing, orbital, or forecasting analysis. Spans domains including archeology (demographics, paleoclimate proxies, radiocarbon dating, historical conflicts); biomedical/bioinformatics (tumor histology, genes, proteins, peptides, genomic variants); environmental (water quality, bacterial/Enterococcus exceedance, rainfall correlations, environmental justice); legal/consumer (fraud, identity theft, consumer complaints by state/metro); wildfire (incidents, causes, suppression costs, acres burned, fatalities, geospatial intersections); and astronomy/heliophysics/space weather (satellite telemetry TLE/Swarm/SP3, indices OMNI/GOES, solar activity, atmospheric density, orbital mechanics, forecasting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
agentscope-ai/QwenPaw-Data☆ 1332026年10月13日 更新
Pull metrics from analytics dashboards and internal web tools with Firecrawl browser. Use when the user needs dashboard reporting, cross-platform metric summaries, authenticated analytics extraction, date-range reports, or structured metrics from web dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
firecrawl/skills☆ 1222026年10月9日 更新
Serverless Aura Graph Analytics (AGA) GDS Sessions — covers GdsSessions, AuraGraphDataScience, AuraAPICredentials, DbmsConnectionInfo, SessionMemory, get_or_create, remote graph projection with gds.graph.project.cypher and gds.graph.project.remote, gds.graph.project.native, gds.graph.construct, graphdatascience client 2.0 session endpoints, async compute and gds.jobs, AuraDB Cypher API memory/sessionId projection, algorithms, write-back, and session lifecycle. Use for AuraDB-connected, self-managed Neo4j, or standalone DataFrame/Spark session workloads. Does NOT cover the embedded GDS plugin on Aura Pro or self-managed Neo4j — use neo4j-gds-skill. Does NOT handle Cypher authoring — use neo4j-cypher-skill. Does NOT cover Snowflake Graph Analytics — use neo4j-snowflake-graph-analytics-skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
neo4j-contrib/neo4j-skills☆ 1152026年10月12日 更新
Comprehensive social media management for all platforms (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Pinterest, YouTube). Covers content creation, content pillars, hook formulas, repurposing across platforms, platform-optimized graphics/visuals, content calendar, engagement strategy, analytics/ROI analysis, AI-powered content generation, and scheduling best practices. Use for: social media content, LinkedIn post, Twitter thread, Instagram reels, TikTok, content calendar, social scheduling, engagement strategy, social analytics, social media ROI, content repurposing, social graphics, thumbnails, captions, hashtags, viral content, content creator, social media manager, AI content generation, social media audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin☆ 1062026年9月18日 更新
Interpret learning analytics data and translate dashboard findings into actionable teaching decisions. Use when reviewing LMS data, quiz patterns, or engagement metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles☆ 902026年9月24日 更新
Search and analyze TikTok video data, filter videos by region, creator, product, category, views, duration, publish time, selling/ad/AI video flags, and return views, likes, comments, shares, favorites, video sales and GMV metrics across 16 TikTok Shop sites. Trigger when users mention TikTok video search, TikTok video list, TikTok promotional videos, TikTok video data, TikTok video views, TikTok video sales, TikTok video analytics, Nexscope video, TikTok video search, TikTok video list, TikTok video analytics, TikTok promotional videos, TikTok video views, TikTok video engagement. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "Nexscope" or "TikTok", trigger this skill whenever their need involves searching or analyzing TikTok video performance metrics by criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-skills☆ 892026年10月9日 更新
Web search, online retrieval, real-time information query, search engine search, Reddit and other community platform discussions, external site posts and trending topics. Trigger when users need to search for the latest information online, look up recent news or trends, query real-time data, research topics via search engines, browse Reddit or community discussions, discover external site posts and trending topics, obtain any online content, web search, online lookup, real-time information, news search, Reddit, trending topics, search engine. Even if the user does not explicitly say "search", trigger this skill whenever their intent involves obtaining real-time web information or verifying current facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-skills☆ 892026年10月9日 更新
Query and analyze Google Trends real-time hot topics and trending searches for a specified time range and country/region. Triggered by: Google Trends, hot topics, real-time trending, popular trends, current hot searches, recent trending, viral topics, trending searches, trend discovery, market trends, what's popular, trending now, breakout topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-skills☆ 892026年10月9日 更新
Amazon reverse product selection: filter Amazon niches and keywords by 30+ business dimensions (market size & growth, price tiers & share, competition density & top concentration, demographics such as age/gender/income, review highlights & pain points) from a metrics pool aggregated from historical business insight reports. Trigger when users mention reverse product selection, metrics filtering, niche reverse lookup, blue ocean niche discovery, low-competition niche, newcomer-friendly niche, brand-fragmented market, pain-point entry, feature reverse lookup, pricing tier opportunity, demographic-based selection, or similar terms. Even if the user does not explicitly say "reverse product selection," trigger this skill whenever the request involves filtering Amazon niches that match specific business criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nexscope-ai/nexscope-ecommerce-skills☆ 892026年10月9日 更新
🇺🇸 Hardware + SaaS GTM Playbook — End-to-end go-to-market for consumer hardware products with software subscription models. Covers crowdfunding engineering (Kickstarter/Indiegogo/Makuake), KOL matrix for physical products, hardware PMF validation metrics, device-as-funnel subscription design, localization entry timing, and community flywheel mechanics. Built from verified Plaud, Insta360, and DJI case data. 🇨🇳 硬件+软件订阅 GTM 实操手册 — 面向消费硬件产品的完整出海及增长打法。覆盖众筹超额工程（KS/IGG/Makuake）、硬件 KOL 矩阵策略、硬件 PMF 验证、设备即漏斗订阅设计、本地化进入时机判断、社区飞轮构建。基于 Plaud/Insta360/大疆真实案例数据撰写。 🇯🇵 ハードウェア＋SaaS GTMプレイブック — クラウドファンディング（Kickstarter/IGG/Makuake）を起点とした消費者向けハードウェア製品のGTM戦略。KOLマトリクス、PMF検証、デバイスをファネルとするサブスクリプション設計、ローカライゼーション進入タイミング、コミュニティフライホイールまで網羅。Plaud・Insta360・DJIの実例データに基づく。 🇰🇷 하드웨어+SaaS GTM 플레이북 — 크라우드펀딩(Kickstarter/IGG/Makuake) 기반 소비자 하드웨어 제품의 엔드투엔드 GTM 전략. KOL 매트릭스, PMF 검증, 디바이스-as-퍼널 구독 설계, 현지화 진입 타이밍, 커뮤니티 플라이휠 포함. Plaud·Insta360·DJI 실제 사례 데이터 기반. Triggers: "hardware GTM" | "crowdfunding strategy" | "hardware+SaaS" | "Kickstarter launch" | "hardware KOL" | "hardware PMF" | "device subscription" | "hardware product launch" | "consumer hardware growth" | "Makuake" | "众筹策略" | "硬件出海" | "硬件+订阅" | "硬件GTM" | "KS众筹" | "硬件PMF" | "设备订阅" | "硬件冷启动" | "ハードウェアGTM" | "クラファン" | "하드웨어 GTM" | "크라우드펀딩"
Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills☆ 842026年10月8日 更新
You launched an ambassador program. 3 applications. One ghosted after week 2. Should you lower the bar? Offer more perks? Spam influencers? This gives you the complete community & ambassador operations SOP — from pre-launch checklist to recruitment to tiered management to retention to governance. Built from Notion (20M users, real ambassador interviews), AFFiNE (60K stars), Asana, and ClickUp programs. By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • Pre-launch readiness checklist (6 conditions that must be true before starting) • 6-step community setup SOP (platform selection → rules → admin standards → monitoring → wiki → metrics) • Ambassador recruitment system (A+B qualification, application form design, scoring rubric) • 4-tier progression system (Bronze → Silver → Gold → Platinum with point thresholds) • 5-pillar incentive framework (Product quality → Beta access → Founder access → KOL path → Full engagement) • Churn early-warning system + retention playbook • Event operations SOP (6 event types × full lifecycle) • Health metrics dashboard (6 core KPIs + 5 ambassador-specific indicators) • Governance & risk control (behavior code, escalation matrix) • Real templates: recruitment post, welcome email, annual calendar 🇨🇳 你搞了个大使计划。来了3个申请。一个第二周就消失了。该降门槛？加福利？群发KOL？这份SOP给你从启动前置条件到招募到留存到治理的完整社区/大使运营方法论。基于 Notion（2000万用户，大使真实访谈）、AFFiNE（60K stars）、Asana、ClickUp 实战案例。 🇯🇵 アンバサダープログラムを立ち上げた。応募3件。1人は2週間で消えた。基準を下げる？特典を増やす？このSOPは、事前チェックリストから採用、段階管理、リテンション、ガバナンスまでの完全なコミュニティ＆アンバサダー運営フレームワークを提供します。Notion（2000万ユーザー）、AFFiNE（60K stars）の実例から構築。 🇰🇷 앰배서더 프로그램을 시작했습니다. 지원 3건. 하나는 2주 만에 사라졌습니다. 기준을 낮출까요? 이 SOP는 사전 체크리스트부터 모집, 단계별 관리, 리텐션, 거버넌스까지 완전한 커뮤니티 & 앰배서더 운영 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Notion(2000만 사용자), AFFiNE(60K stars) 실전 사례에서 구축. Triggers: "ambassador program" | "community building" | "community management" | "DevRel" | "developer relations" | "community growth" | "大使计划" | "社区运营" | "社区搭建" | "コミュニティ運営" | "アンバサダー" | "커뮤니티 운영" | "앰배서더" | "open source community" | "user retention"
Gingiris-1031/gingiris-skills☆ 842026年10月8日 更新
Reference for the diagnostics pipeline (ripdpi-monitor-engine/ripdpi-diagnostics-* and core/diagnostics). Use when changing ScanRequest/ScanReport, ProbeTask families, probe scheduling, the catalog, or the wire contract. Techniques: desync-engine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
po4yka/RIPDPI☆ 792026年10月14日 更新
Analytics reconnaissance for takeover — find all analytics tools, inventory what's tracked and dashboarded, assess data freshness and metric definitions, and present a coverage map. Use when asked "what analytics exist", "BI assessment", or "what do we track".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tonone-ai/tonone☆ 762026年10月5日 更新
Use when asked to select chart types for analytics dashboards, choose BI visualizations, or design data displays. Examples: "best chart for sales data", "dashboard visualization for metrics", "analytics chart selection"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tonone-ai/tonone☆ 762026年10月5日 更新
Instrumentation plan — design event taxonomy, property schema, and tracking plan for analytics tools. Use when asked to "what should we track", "instrumentation plan", "set up analytics events", "analytics event schema", "tracking plan", or "instrument this feature".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tonone-ai/tonone☆ 762026年10月5日 更新