「integrity」の検索結果

Investigate supply chain attack artifacts including trojanized software updates, compromised build pipelines, and sideloaded dependencies to identify intrusion vectors and scope of compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work the verification ladder of a research run with rs_verify — read the ladder report before claiming anything is checked, run the two file rungs (r1-record, r2-locate) that need no reader, record the r3-support verdicts and strength verdicts that only a reader can make, tell a miss from an inconclusive, and know what a clean build will still refuse. Use when a document is written and about to be called checked, when a claim's quote does not match its source, or when a gate or build answers with an integrity refusal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies truthfulness, accuracy, and link integrity of content before publishing. Catches fabricated statistics, dead URLs, misattributed sources, and company claims that contradict the brand DNA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "measure how our narrative is landing", "track echo rate against our canon lexicon", or "check how AI answer engines describe our brand"; produces a resonance report — echo rate (overlap of market language with the narrative-registry canon lexicon, method declared), AI-answer perception via tavily.py --answer (proxy-labeled), share-of-voice on a locked competitor panel (reusing share-of-voice-tracker), and resonance signals from bluesky.py / gdelt.py / pageviews.py — every number labeled Measured / proxy / User-provided, feeding the TALE E dimension and the upstream of the E1 evidence-integrity veto. Not for rebuilding share-of-voice machinery — use share-of-voice-tracker; not for own-site GA4/GSC analytics — use performance-monitor; not for scoring TALE profile result — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry. 回声率/AI回答感知/份额之声/共鸣信号

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a paid ad account for incremental contribution, wasted spend, or measurement integrity before scaling; runs a typed 20-item ROAS profile with verified vetoes and a SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED gate on own exported data. Not for campaign structure design — use campaign-architect; not for creative production — use ad-creative-builder. 付费广告账户审计/ROAS评分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure data model/DB designs cover constraints, integrity, indexes, migrations, rollback, and operational impacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pbi-input, plan, todo, test-cases 間の整合性をチェックし、実装着手前の仕様漏れを検知する

Implements type-safe reactive SQL persistence in Flutter using Drift v2.32 (formerly Moor) built on SQLite with automatic code generation. Activates when defining table schemas with Drift DSL, writing type-safe join or subquery operations, handling schema migrations with MigrationStrategy, using reactive watch() streams for live UI updates, implementing ACID transactions, defining foreign key constraints or cascade deletes, enabling WAL mode for write performance, troubleshooting generated .g.dart type mismatches, migrating from sqflite or sqlite3 v2 to v3, using DAOs for query separation, or building offline-first apps requiring strong relational data integrity and compile-time SQL verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-driven application audit protocol for security, authorization, privacy, concurrency, state integrity, reliability, performance, accessibility, visual consistency, responsive behavior, and release readiness. Use for incremental checks, pre-merge review, pre-launch audits, high-stakes deep audits, AI-generated code review, hardening, or release-gate design. Prefer this protocol over ad-hoc review when the user asks whether software is safe or ready to ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix rad-mem installation issues. Checks PM2 worker status, database integrity, service health, dependencies, and provides automated fixes for common problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-integrity skill. Use for backend/API/persistence, preserve/do-not-change, tests/validation, mocks, rework, multi-part requests. Emits Goal Contracts, Deviation Notices, Phase Checks, Final Audits

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review homework notebooks for completeness, reproducibility, safe execution, and academic-integrity boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en détection de contenu IA (watermarking, outils de détection, originalité, intégrité académique)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive 9-step prompt crafting and delegation protocol for autonomous multi-agent teams. Enforces objective verification, integrity modes, and acceptance criteria across Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, and Roo Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure Helm chart Dağıt:ments by validating chart integrity, scanning templates for misconfigurations, and enforcing security contexts in Kubernetes releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bu skill covers implementing code signing for build artifacts to ensure integrity and authenticity throughout the software supply chain. It addresses signing binaries, packages, and containers using GPG, Sigstore, and platform-specific signing tools, establishing trust chains, and verifying signatures in Dağıt:ment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ed25519 is a high-performance digital signature algorithm using the Edwards curve Curve25519. It provides 128-bit security with 64-byte signatures and 32-byte keys, offering significant advantages ove

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement software supply chain integrity verification for container builds using the in-toto framework to create cryptographically signed attestations across CI/CD pipeline steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。