「java」の検索結果

Expert blueprint for HTML5/web export on Compatibility (WebGL 2.0): JavaScriptBridge, localStorage wrapper, custom loading shells, COOP/COEP hosts, relative paths, beforeunload, visibility pause, and size optimization. WebGPU is out of scope. Keywords: web, HTML5, WebGL, Compatibility, JavaScriptBridge, localStorage, COOP, COEP, canvas, browser API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOLID principles checklist with Java examples. Use when a class has too many responsibilities, an abstraction leaks, or a dependency points the wrong way, and when the user asks about Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov, Interface Segregation or Dependency Inversion. For naming, duplication and method length, use clean-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Common design patterns with Java examples (Factory, Builder, Strategy, Observer, Decorator, etc.). Use when user asks "implement pattern", "use factory", "strategy pattern", or when designing extensible components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect potential code-level performance smells in Java - streams, collections, boxing, regex, object creation. Provides awareness, not absolutes - always measure before optimizing. For JPA/database performance, use jpa-patterns instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate conventional commit messages for Java projects. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", "commit changes", or after completing code changes that need to be committed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Java concurrency code for thread safety, race conditions, deadlocks, and modern patterns (Virtual Threads, CompletableFuture, @Async). Use when user asks "check thread safety", "concurrency review", "async code review", or when reviewing multi-threaded code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write high-quality JUnit 5 tests with AssertJ assertions. Use when user says "add tests", "write tests", "improve test coverage", or when reviewing/creating test classes for Java code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Java logging best practices with SLF4J, structured logging (JSON), and MDC for request tracing. Includes AI-friendly log formats for Claude Code debugging. Use when user asks about logging, debugging application flow, or analyzing logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Java project architecture at macro level - package structure, module boundaries, dependency direction, and layering. Use when user asks "review architecture", "check structure", "package organization", or when evaluating if a codebase follows clean architecture principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

使用Python pandas或Java POI将Excel文件中的多个Sheet合并到一个Sheet中，并新增一列记录数据来源的Sheet名称。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure development tools, linting, formatting, and test runners for existing JavaScript projects. Use for ESLint, Prettier, Jest, or equivalent tool setup; defer application implementation and generic project scaffolding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Java coding standards for Spring Boot services: naming, immutability, Optional usage, streams, exceptions, generics, and project layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ESLint in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript, TypeScript, React, or other Node-based frontend assets. USE FOR: the repo has package.json, eslint.config.*, .eslintrc*, tsconfig.json, or JS/TS/React frontend files; the user asks for JavaScript or TypeScript linting, React rule. DO NOT USE FOR: CSS ownership by itself; route that to stylelint; HTML-only checks on static output; route that to htmlhint. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes .NET MAUI development environment issues. Validates .NET SDK, workloads, Java JDK, Android SDK, Xcode, and Windows SDK. All version requirements discovered dynamically from NuGet WorkloadDependencies.json — never hardcoded. Use when: setting up MAUI development, build errors mentioning SDK/workload/JDK/Android, "Android SDK not found", "Java version" errors, "Xcode not found", environment verification after updates, or any MAUI toolchain issues. Do not use for: non-MAUI .NET projects, Xamarin.Forms apps, runtime app crashes unrelated to environment setup, or app store publishing issues. Works on macOS, Windows, and Linux.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review Blazor components (.razor files) with correct architecture. USE FOR: writing new Blazor components that do NOT involve JavaScript interop, implementing parameters and EventCallback, RenderFragment slots, component lifecycle (OnInitializedAsync, OnParametersSet), async patterns, IAsyncDisposable, CancellationToken, CSS isolation, code-behind. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new projects (use create-blazor-project), JavaScript interop or calling browser APIs from Blazor (use use-js-interop), forms and validation (use collect-user-input), prerendering issues (use support-prerendering), HTTP data fetching patterns (use fetch-and-send-data), coordinating state between unrelated components (use coordinate-components).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance for an AI agent with enterprise tools; Add human oversight and auditability to LLM workflows; Assess RAG or model-driven decision support before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support financial entities, critical ICT services, third-party ICT provider integrations, or operational resilience obligations under DORA. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DORA ICT risk controls; Design operational resilience evidence for a financial service; Add incident, continuity, backup, recovery, or third-party ICT controls; Assess resilience testing and monitoring before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that process personal data and need GDPR-aware engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java service for GDPR privacy controls; Design data-subject rights workflows; Add retention, deletion, pseudonymization, or privacy-safe logging; Assess data transfer, DPIA, breach evidence, or processor/controller boundary concerns before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that expose, exchange, store, process, export, or port data across users, businesses, connected products, cloud providers, APIs, event streams, AI data pipelines, data spaces, or SaaS platforms and need EU Data Act engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for EU Data Act controls; Design data access and portability evidence; Add data-sharing request workflows, export formats, interoperability, metadata, audit logs, cloud-switching support, non-personal data safeguards, or trade-secret handoffs; Assess Data Act engineering readiness before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support intermediary services, hosting services, online platforms, marketplaces, content moderation, recommender systems, advertising delivery, complaint workflows, transparency reporting, or systemic-risk evidence under the EU Digital Services Act. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java online platform for DSA controls; Design notice-and-action or appeal workflows; Add recommender, ad transparency, moderation, audit, researcher access, or privacy-safe observability evidence; Assess online-platform transparency controls before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Digital Markets Act gatekeeper-platform concerns, core platform services, interoperability, business-user data access, consent-dependent data combination, ranking, self-preferencing, advertising transparency, or anti-circumvention controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java platform for DMA controls; Design interoperability and business-user data access evidence; Add ranking, consent, preference, or anti-circumvention audit controls; Assess gatekeeper-platform engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing Java enterprise evidence for MiFID II investment services, investment activities, client classification, suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, best-execution evidence, algorithmic-trading governance evidence, market-access governance evidence, transaction evidence, record keeping, monitoring, or compliance-owner handoff. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java investment-service platform for MiFID II evidence; Assess suitability, appropriateness, order-handling evidence, or best-execution evidence; Document audit, monitoring, or clock-synchronisation gaps for algorithmic-trading governance; Assess investment-service engineering evidence before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。