「latency」の検索結果

Use when working with AWS API Gateway — analyzing REST or HTTP APIs, debugging latency or 5xx errors, auditing throttling and stage configuration, reviewing usage plans, or checking authorization setup. Covers API inventory, CloudWatch metrics, stage audits, and integration health for both REST (v1) and HTTP (v2) APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: benchmark model latency, throughput, or quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edge Computing Specialist IA — Expert en edge computing (Cloudflare Workers, Deno Deploy, Vercel Edge, Bun)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en performance des agents IA (optimisation latence, streaming, caching, traitement par lots)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en observabilité des agents IA (tracing, logging, suivi des coûts, latence, métriques qualité)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and interpret iOS Simulator ETTrace profiles. Use when profiling launch or runtime latency, comparing traces, or finding CPU-heavy stacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in building voice AI applications - from real-time voice agents to voice-enabled apps. Covers OpenAI Realtime API, Vapi for voice agents, Deepgram for transcription, ElevenLabs for synthesis, LiveKit for real-time infrastructure, and WebRTC fundamentals. Knows how to build low-latency, production-ready voice experiences. Use when: voice ai, voice agent, speech to text, text to speech, realtime voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) is the latest version of the Transport Layer Security protocol, providing significant improvements over TLS 1.2 in both security and performance. It reduces handshake latency to 1-R

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase App-in-Skill dashboard visualizing a generated MOCK fleet of LLM agents running behind a shared AI gateway for a generic organization. Use when the user invokes $kelly-agent-observability or /kelly-agent-observability, wants to review agent health, call volume, latency, error rates, cost, or trace-level chain breaks across an agent fleet. This is a demo/reference dashboard over a generated mock fleet snapshot seeded into Busabase by a trusted script — never a live monitoring integration, never a real gateway or real agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) is the latest version of the Transport Layer Security protocol, providing significant improvements over TLS 1.2 in both security and performance. It reduces handshake latency to 1-R

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using AI observability. Rotates through a set of lenses — cost, latency, errors, volume, eval performance, eval/enrichment config, clusters, and tool usage — watching each for trends and spikes sliced by the dimensions it discovers over time. Leans on the sandbox's bundled `exploring-llm-*` deep-dive skills for the actual queries. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other scouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add PostHog LLM analytics to trace AI model usage. Use after implementing LLM features or reviewing PRs to ensure all generations are captured with token counts, latency, and costs. Also handles initial PostHog SDK setup if not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serves LLMs with high throughput using vLLM's PagedAttention and continuous batching. Use when deploying production LLM APIs, optimizing inference latency/throughput, or serving models with limited GPU memory. Supports OpenAI-compatible endpoints, quantization (GPTQ/AWQ/FP8), and tensor parallelism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding monitoring, metrics, logging, or tracing to Spring AI or LLM integration code. Covers token tracking, latency measurement, cost estimation, and prompt/response logging. Use when user mentions AI monitoring, token costs, or LLM observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure, profile, and fix performance bottlenecks — Core Web Vitals, backend latency, bundle size, and database queries. Load when performance requirements exist, users report slowness, profiling reveals bottlenecks, or the user asks to optimize load time, LCP, INP, CLS, or response time. Not for premature optimization without evidence. Pairs with browser-testing-with-devtools and ci-cd-and-automation for regression guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend, create, preview, and attach Coval trace-based metrics from OpenTelemetry spans. Use when a user has Coval traces and wants custom trace metrics, trace-aware LLM judge metrics with include_traces, latency, token usage, provider failures, tool behavior, vertical-specific workflow signals, or production monitoring based on trace attributes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serves LLMs with high throughput using vLLM's PagedAttention and continuous batching. Use when deploying production LLM APIs, optimizing inference latency/throughput, or serving models with limited GPU memory. Supports OpenAI-compatible endpoints, quantization (GPTQ/AWQ/FP8), and tensor parallelism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes LLM inference with NVIDIA TensorRT for maximum throughput and lowest latency. Use for production deployment on NVIDIA GPUs (A100/H100), when you need 10-100x faster inference than PyTorch, or for serving models with quantization (FP8/INT4), in-flight batching, and multi-GPU scaling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managed vector database for production AI applications. Fully managed, auto-scaling, with hybrid search (dense + sparse), metadata filtering, and namespaces. Low latency (<100ms p95). Use for production RAG, recommendation systems, or semantic search at scale. Best for serverless, managed infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic performance profiling and optimization methodology. Covers CPU profiling, memory profiling, heap analysis, goroutine/thread analysis, FlameGraph generation, latency profiling, database query profiling, network I/O profiling, and continuous performance regression detection. USE WHEN: investigating performance issues, optimizing slow code, reducing memory usage, diagnosing GC/CPU bottlenecks, finding N+1 queries, analyzing pprof/flamegraph output, or establishing a performance baseline. Triggers on "profiling", "performance analysis", "slow code", "flame graph", "pprof", "heap dump", "memory leak", "CPU spike", "bottleneck".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。