「literature」の検索結果

Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants an end-to-end AI4S research pipeline — broad direction or specific topic in, full research package out (exploration + literature survey + experiment + paper). Meta-skill that chains the four downstream skills in order. Pure markdown, no Python runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic papers, scholarly articles, and research publications through SandBase. Use when asked for literature review, academic citations, scholarly research, paper discovery, or scientific evidence gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow for retrieving public omics datasets, sequences, annotations, and literature-linked biological resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a research-paper figure Skill Factory: build, patch, package, or use reusable specialized paper-figure-making skills from lawful literature/corpus evidence. Generated skills must use a specialized-skill-first workflow, full-feasible local PDF coverage where available, startup-plan-only first replies, target-paper candidate/final image isolation, mandatory image-embedded visual-structure explanation, mandatory non-target concept/modeling example display for abstract visual decisions, saved subtype/style illustration atlases, ChatGPT web Create image / ChatGPT Images 2.0 rendering, Codex $imagegen-first rendering, sample-image transfer rules, all-step/current-position state footers, and a mandatory first-round diverse candidate board followed by P6b/P6c paper-local best-practice optimization before final prompt construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code MCP tools for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, and frameworks, and inspecting benchmark leaderboards with model-size and metric filters through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, the PwC MCP server, or paperswithcode.co/mcp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code CLI (`pwc`) for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, frameworks, and benchmark leaderboards, and submitting authenticated paper edits through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, `pwc`, or `pwc-cli`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the moral philosophy and literary frameworks of Iris Murdoch (British moral philosopher and novelist). Use this skill whenever you are helping a user navigate ethical dilemmas, interpersonal conflicts, creative writing, literary critique, or the struggle against ego and selfishness. Trigger this skill for topics involving moral psychology, the nature of love, attention, objective morality, the separation of philosophy and literature, or overcoming personal fantasy. Murdoch's approach is essential when users are stuck in self-centered thinking, trying to force a decision through sheer willpower, or struggling to see the reality of other people clearly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the rigorous epidemiological reasoning of Julie E. Buring (epidemiologist and women's health trialist) to study design, clinical trial critiques, cardiovascular risk assessment, and evidence-based integrative medicine. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating medical literature, designing cohort studies or RCTs, assessing conflicting research findings, or analyzing cardiovascular risk factors (especially in women). Reach for this when users ask about the validity of supplements, the discrepancy between observational and randomized data, or how to future-proof a clinical registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design structured perspective-taking activities with anti-projection guardrails. Develops genuine understanding of complexity across history, social sciences, and literature — not performed empathy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query patent forward citation details from the Nexscope patent database. Triggered when users ask about patent citations, cited patents, cited references, patent references, forward citations, prior art citations, or want to see which patents and non-patent literature specific patents cited during the application process, patent cited references, forward citations, patent references, citation analysis, or Nexscope. When users provide a patent ID or publication number and need citation information, even if they do not explicitly say "forward citation," any request about which references a patent cited applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when searching academic papers, looking up citations, finding authors, or getting paper recommendations using the Semantic Scholar API. Triggers on queries about research papers, academic search, citation analysis, or literature discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the Semantic Scholar academic corpus through AI2's Asta MCP server: keyword or title search with venue and date filters, who-cited-a-paper traversal, author profiles and publications, DOI/arXiv/PMID lookup, and ~500-word full-text snippets for evidence, with citation counts and h-index. Use when the user asks for papers on a topic, who cited a paper, an author's work, recent literature since a date, or a venue-scoped paper list. Requires the Asta MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages a Zotero academic reference library through both the local API (localhost:23119, read-only) and the Web API (api.zotero.org, read-write), using a structured collection hierarchy (Inbox / Active Projects / Background / Reading Queue / Archive / Meta) plus project, status, priority, and type tags. Handles adding papers with full metadata, deduplication, attaching provenance notes, moving items between collections, updating tags after reading, listing the prioritized reading queue, and setting up the literature scaffold for a new project. Use when the user asks to add / save / file / organize a paper in Zotero, check / list / clean up the reading queue, move papers between collections, tag papers for a project, query their library ("what do I have on X?"), or set up Zotero for a new research project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a systematic related-work / literature-survey / state-of-the-art review for a research question by defining survey dimensions, searching each axis, building a taxonomy of prior work, identifying the gap, and producing a positioning narrative for a paper's Related Work section. Goes beyond a flat paper list to deliver structured analysis. Use when the user is starting a new research project and needs to map the landscape, asks "what's been done on X?" or "how does my idea compare to existing work?", needs to write or revise a Related Work / Background / Prior Art section, wants to identify a research gap or position their contribution, or asks to build a taxonomy of approaches in a research area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch download academic paper full-text (PDF/XML) from a list of DOIs. Handles 25 DOI prefixes across 19 publisher families via three layered routes: (1) publisher TDM APIs requiring institutional subscription (Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley Online, Springer Nature), (2) Open Access sources (Crossref, Unpaywall, OpenAlex), and (3) a browser-based fallback for paywalled publishers without TDM access (ACS, RSC, IEEE, AIP, IOP, APS, Annual Reviews, T&F, Chinese journals). Browser fallback offers two routes — Route A drives the user's logged-in Chrome via the OpenClaw `browser` tool with `profile="user"` (best for interactive sessions), Route B uses the standalone `auto-paper-harvester` CLI with its built-in Playwright (best for unattended bulk runs). Use when the user wants to harvest, scrape, fetch, or bulk-download papers from a DOI list, savedrecs export, or Excel; or wants to fill missing full-text PDFs for an existing literature collection. Triggers on phrases like "批量下载文献", "下载全文", "harvest papers", "scrape full text", "TDM API", "下载 Elsevier 全文", "Wiley 批量下载", "下载 PDF".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic papers across arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, bioRxiv, medRxiv, Google Scholar, and more. Get BibTeX citations, download PDFs, analyze citation networks. Use for literature reviews, finding papers, and academic research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。