AWS Step Functions workflow orchestration with state machines. Use when designing workflows, implementing error handling, configuring parallel execution, integrating with AWS services, or debugging executions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,854 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AWS Step Functions workflow orchestration with state machines. Use when designing workflows, implementing error handling, configuring parallel execution, integrating with AWS services, or debugging executions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build reactive backends with Convex functions, schema validation, auth integration, and deployment workflows. Use when building real-time apps with type-safe server functions and automatic caching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build serverless applications on Azure Functions. Configure triggers, bindings, and deployment. Use when implementing serverless workloads on Azure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CloudBase Run backend development rules (Function mode/Container mode). Use this skill when deploying backend services that require long connections, multi-language support, custom environments, AI agent development, or migrating existing/GitHub apps that need VPC access to MySQL/PostgreSQL/Redis. Also use when diagnosing CloudRun container deploy failures (deploy_failed, readiness/probe failed, image won't start, docker.io pull loops) or a deploy stuck behind a running deploy task. For stateless HTTP services, prefer HTTP cloud functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CloudBase declarative deployment from a cloudbaserc config (声明式部署, 配置式部署, cloudbaserc 部署) through the deployBuild / deployPlan / deployApply MCP tools. Use when deploying database, functions, app, hosting, or gateway resources described in cloudbaserc.json/yaml as a single desired-state config, when a user wants to build static hosting artifacts locally first (deployBuild), or wants a dry-run plan before applying (deployPlan), or when handling multi-environment deploys via mode / envOverrides. Covers build-plan-apply flow (deployBuild local build → deployPlan dry-run → deployApply confirm=true), hosting build-output neutralization, envId resolution priority, only/skip filtering, concurrency, and continueOnError. Prefer deployBuild (when hosting declares a buildCommand) and deployPlan before deployApply; do not confuse with per-resource tcb CLI deploy or single-function deploy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a full-stack TanStack Start app on Cloudflare Workers from scratch — SSR, file-based routing, server functions, D1+Drizzle, better-auth, Tailwind v4+shadcn/ui. Use whenever the user mentions TanStack Start, asks to scaffold a full-stack Cloudflare app with SSR, wants an SSR dashboard, or asks for a React 19 + Cloudflare Workers app with file-based routing and server functions — even if they don't name TanStack Start specifically. No template repo — Claude generates every file fresh per project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and run Gemini 2.5 Computer Use browser-control agents with Playwright. Use when a user wants to automate web browser tasks via the Gemini Computer Use model, needs an agent loop (screenshot → function_call → action → function_response), or asks to integrate safety confirmation for risky UI actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.
Produce a creative brief grounded in live reference sites and deliberately distinct from existing demos, for any new brand build. Composes with brand-archetype-system and creative-direction. Use this skill at the start of any brand or microsite build when the result needs to land in a specific aesthetic position and not drift into a default house style. Triggers on creative brief, design brief, build brief, brand direction, where should this brand sit, what should this site look like, reference sites for, archetype for, distinct from our other brands, divergence from prior, not the same as. Also triggers when prior builds have come out as siblings and a systematic divergence approach is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk the user through four directional axes (tone register, aesthetic philosophy, audience relationship, sensory ambition) and produce a structured aesthetic brief that downstream content, copy, design, and art-direction skills consume as required input. The aesthetic depth layer, distinct from `creative-brief` (operational kickoff: scope, audience, deliverables, constraints). Use when a project needs aesthetic coherence across many small decisions and the user has only a vague feeling, or when multiple downstream aesthetic-producing skills need a shared brief. Triggers on creative direction, aesthetic direction, set the aesthetic, define the visual direction, what's the vibe, what's the tone, the four axes. Does NOT fire for a general kickoff brief (use `creative-brief`), tactical single-piece work, already-documented direction, purely functional output, or locked production-stage work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, deploy, test, and debug serverless applications with AWS Lambda. Triggers on phrases like: Lambda function, event source, serverless application, API Gateway, EventBridge, Step Functions, serverless API, event-driven architecture, Lambda trigger. For deploying non-serverless apps to AWS, use deploy-on-aws plugin instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build workflows with AWS Step Functions state machines using the JSONata query language. Covers Amazon States Language (ASL) structure, state types, variables, data transformation, error handling, AWS service integration, and migrating from the JSONPath to the JSONata query language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AWS SAM and AWS CDK deployment for serverless applications. Triggers on phrases like: use SAM, SAM template, SAM init, SAM deploy, CDK serverless, CDK Lambda construct, NodejsFunction, PythonFunction, SAM and CDK together, serverless CI/CD pipeline. For general app deployment with service selection, use deploy-on-aws plugin instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sanctions and export control analysis tool for Claude Desktop. Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries. All results sourced and verified in real time — no memory-based answers. Responds in French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. Updated 19 May 2026 (EU 20th package, UK SEUC, Cuba EO). Indicative guidance only — not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocasos (from Caso 01 secuestro through Caso 11 violencia sexual, including Caso 03 falsos positivos), the three sanction tiers (propias, alternativas, ordinarias), TOAR, and the SIVJRNR sister bodies (CEV, UBPD). Guards the key structural distinctions (Sala de Reconocimiento vs Tribunal para la Paz; comparecientes FARC-EP vs Fuerza Pública vs terceros civiles; Acto Legislativo 01/2017 vs Ley Estatutaria 1957/2019). Research aid, not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instinct-based learning system that observes sessions via hooks, creates atomic instincts with confidence scoring, and evolves them into skills/commands/agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert blueprint for procedural content generation (dungeons, terrain, loot, levels) using FastNoiseLite, random walks, BSP trees, Wave Function Collapse, and seeded randomization. Use when creating roguelikes, sandbox games, or dynamic content. Keywords procedural, generation, FastNoiseLite, Perlin noise, BSP, drunkard walk, Wave Function Collapse, seeding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write architecture fitness functions — deterministic tests that enforce a project's hard rules (module boundaries, offline guarantees, content contracts) from inside its own test target. Use when a constraint lives only in prose (CLAUDE.md, code review) and should become un-arguable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guideline-4.3 anti-spam / originality gate — score whether an app (and each portfolio addition) is meaningfully distinct in function, content, and metadata before you invest or submit. Use at validation/new-app time and again before submission. Protects the whole developer account from 4.3 (spam/duplicate) rejections. NOT rejection-handler (that works an existing rejection) and NOT competitive-analysis (that positions in the market).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ProteoDisco is an R package to facilitate proteogenomics studies. It houses functions to create customized (variant) protein databases based on user-submitted genomic variants, splice-junctions, fusion genes and manual transcript sequences. The flexible workflow can be adopted to suit a myriad of research and experimental settings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This packages provides C++ header files for developers wishing to create R packages that processes BAM files. ompBAM automates file access, memory management, and handling of multiple threads 'behind the scenes', so developers can focus on creating domain-specific functionality. The included vignette contains detailed documentation of this API, including quick-start instructions to create a new ompBAM-based package, and step-by-step explanation of the functionality behind the example packaged in
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The sva package contains functions for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiment. Specifically, the sva package contains functions for the identifying and building surrogate variables for high-dimensi
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
standR is an user-friendly R package providing functions to assist conducting good-practice analysis of Nanostring's GeoMX DSP data. All functions in the package are built based on the SpatialExperiment object, allowing integration into various spatial transcriptomics-related packages from Bioconductor. standR allows data inspection, quality control, normalization, batch correction and evaluation with informative visualizations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。