1,484 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a marketing performance report with key metrics, trend analysis, wins and misses, and prioritized optimization recommendations. Use when wrapping a campaign, when preparing weekly, monthly, or quarterly channel summaries for stakeholders, or when you need data translated into an executive summary with next-period priorities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and recommendations. Use when you have interview transcripts, survey results, usability test notes, support tickets, or NPS responses that need to be distilled into patterns, user segments, and prioritized next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the authoritative global Herdr Review and Work Manager inventory, recommend actionable PR work, and explicitly materialize confirmed remote-only Review Manager records through the plugin's stable public CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Memory health dashboard showing line counts, topic files, capacity, stale entries, and recommendations. Use when the user runs /si:memory-status or asks how full or healthy the agent memory is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mentor for embedded and IoT hardware projects. Helps select MCUs, dev boards, and toolchains, decides where sensor readings end up (phone, PC, dashboard, or alert), and gives time/cost estimates and a phased build plan from breadboard MVP to production PCB. Use when the user mentions embedded, IoT, microcontroller, ESP32, STM32, Arduino, Raspberry Pi Pico, firmware, PCB, KiCad, EasyEDA, PlatformIO, MQTT, Home Assistant, ESPHome, Grafana, an IoT dashboard, seeing sensor data on a phone, or asks for hardware tool recommendations, project planning, or cost/time estimates for an electronics project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection (e.g., 'which channel actually makes money — direct or partner?').
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success. Use when analyzing customer accounts, reviewing retention metrics, scoring at-risk customers, or when the user mentions churn, customer health scores, upsell opportunities, expansion revenue, retention analysis, or customer analytics. Runs three Python CLI tools to produce deterministic health scores, churn risk tiers, and prioritized expansion recommendations across Enterprise, Mid-Market, and SMB segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 3 of building a Claude Managed Agent — the bounded grade→iterate loop. Define a CMA outcome (a required markdown rubric graded by an isolated grader), read each verdict, decide the next move (sharpen / re-run / promote to schedule), and once a version passes, run held-back eval cases in parallel. Use when the user says "grade my agent", "make it pass the rubric", "iterate until it's good", "is it good enough", or when the orchestrator routes phase=grade-iterate. outcome_builder.py builds the user.define_outcome payload (rubric required, max_iterations clamped 1..20 — never unbounded); verdict_reader.py reads the grader result and recommends the next move; eval_scaffold.py generates held-back cases + a parallel run plan (capped at the 25-thread CMA ceiling). Distinct from stage-launch (first launch) and run-without-you (scheduling).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles), purchasing-cycle analysis (bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints), or risk-balanced supplier consolidation that refuses single-source recommendations for tier-1 categories without a documented break-glass plan. Triggers on "spend audit", "SaaS audit", "spend categorization", "supplier rationalization", "supplier consolidation", "category strategy", "duplicate SaaS", "renewal cluster".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mentor Swedish language learners by selecting YouTube video clips and podcast episodes by CEFR level and skill (listening, reading, writing, speaking), and building a simple learning path. Use when the user asks about a Swedish learning path, YouTube clips or podcasts for Swedish, SFI videos, level assessment for svenska, or requests for Peter SFI / Lätt Svenska med Oskar / Radio Sweden på lätt svenska / Klartext-style recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prioritize a backlog of feature ideas based on impact, effort, risk, and strategic alignment with top 5 recommendations. Use when prioritizing a feature backlog, making scope decisions, or ranking product ideas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a detailed SWOT analysis — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats with actionable recommendations. Use when doing strategic assessment, competitive analysis, or evaluating a product or business position.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze A/B test results with statistical significance, sample size validation, confidence intervals, and ship/extend/stop recommendations. Use when evaluating experiment results, checking if a test reached significance, interpreting split test data, or deciding whether to ship a variant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional infographics with 21 layout types and 22 visual styles. Analyzes content, recommends layout×style combinations, and generates publication-ready infographics. Use when user asks to create "infographic", "信息图", "visual summary", "可视化", or "高密度信息大图".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find flaky tests from CI logs — aggregates pass rates, spots intermittent failures, recommends quarantine. After multiple runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope creep check — current scope versus the original plan. Flags additions, quantifies bloat, recommends cuts. 'Any scope creep?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance profiling — find bottlenecks, measure against budgets, produce ranked optimization recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。