857 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate structured CSV security audit reports from vulnerability data with proper filtering and formatting. This skill covers CSV schema design for security reports, using Python csv.DictWriter, severity-based filtering, and field mapping from JSON to tabular format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for formulating, solving, debugging, and validating mixed-integer linear optimization models with open-source solvers, including variable indexing, sparse constraints, linearized costs, solver limits, MIP gaps, incumbent extraction, numerical tolerances, and deterministic output reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for multi-hop / triangulated currency conversion on batch rate tapes. When a rate row carries an explicit "via" currency, the row's rate is only one leg of the conversion, and the via currency may ITSELF be quoted through another via — so the effective rate is the product of every leg, resolved by walking the chain until a direct quote is reached. Useful when an FX feed lists some pairs directly to the reporting currency and others as triangulated (or doubly-triangulated) quotes through vehicle currencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Geospatial routing data handling for depot and station coordinates, route node IDs, internal index mappings, great-circle distance matrices, and route-distance reconstruction. Use when optimization or reporting tasks involve latitude/longitude, station IDs, depots, distance metrics, vehicle routes, or validating travel distance from reported paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress; reviewer-disposition variance reporting via --peer --variance N. Auto-invokes /review-r + /audit-reproducibility on referenced scripts unless --no-cross-artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-brief + claim-record discipline for delegated or AI-assisted research work. Use when starting any substantive research task or long autonomous run (write the brief first), and when reporting results that will support a claim in a paper or decision (produce the claim record). Keeps faster execution from being confused with credible evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates source-grounded internal or external weekly engagement status reports with optional Outlook draft creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only evo run reporting. Use when the user invokes /evo:report, asks what happened overnight, asks what improved recently, asks for the best/frontier candidates, asks for a quick score chart without opening the dashboard, or wants the scatter plot in chat output. Never run benchmarks, gates, Slurm commands, evo run, or ad-hoc verification scripts for report requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes finance: Bigdata/RavenPack, US fundamentals/yfinance, A-share news/policy, sector Top N/公告, Gangtise/岗底斯 setup. Reads one bundled specialist. Pharma reporting and general argument review keep their own direct entries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users design high-performing product and engineering organizations by choosing the right reporting models, team sizes, and cross-functional partnerships. It focuses on reducing friction and maximizing ownership through structural clarity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it survives expert anonymous review — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Field Crops Research or deciding whether an agronomy / crop-physiology manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-scale multi-environment and replication bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Soil Biology & Biochemistry or deciding whether a soil-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the soil-process-mechanism bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment or deciding whether an agroecosystem-environment manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the field-to-landscape environmental-outcome bar, data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Agronomy for Sustainable Development or deciding whether an agronomy / farming-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the explicit-and-evidenced sustainability-contribution bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Communications Earth & Environment or deciding whether an earth, environmental, or planetary-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the solid-and-complete-advance bar, Nature Portfolio reporting/data standards, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing the experiments of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — matched baselines per modality, ablations that isolate the cross-modal fusion, user studies or QoE measurement where the claim is subjective, dataset and media licensing, and honest compute reporting, so evidence supports a multimedia claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing ACM CCS experiments, attack demonstrations, adaptive-attack defense evaluations, security measurements, baselines, overhead and cost reporting, ablations, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on evidence that survives an adversarial program committee rather than leaderboard wins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。