「reports」の検索結果

Read, create, or edit Microsoft Word .docx files — extract/summarize text and tables, generate reports/letters/memos with headings, tables, images, TOC and page numbers, do find-and-replace, or apply tracked changes (redlines) and comments. Use whenever the user has a .docx or wants a Word deliverable. Not for PDF, .xlsx, .pptx, or Google Docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform data into compelling narratives using visualization, context, and persuasive structure. Use when presenting analytics to stakeholders, creating data reports, or building executive presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic Power BI performance troubleshooting prompt for identifying, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues in Power BI models, reports, and queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Power BI report visualization design prompt for creating effective, user-friendly, and accessible reports with optimal chart selection and layout design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt repository-level harness engineering for coding agents. Use when a user wants to prevent repeated AI coding-agent mistakes by turning failures into durable instructions, drift checks, regression tests, failure memory, and adoption reports tailored to the target repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools. Use this skill when users want to create bug reports, feature requests, or task issues, update existing issues, add labels/assignees/milestones, manage repository labels, set issue fields (dates, priority, custom fields), set issue types, manage issue workflows, link issues, add dependencies, or track blocked-by/blocking relationships. Triggers on requests like "create an issue", "file a bug", "request a feature", "update issue X", "set the priority", "set the start date", "create a label", "rename a label", "list repo labels", "link issues", "add dependency", "blocked by", "blocking", or any GitHub issue management task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pro+ subscription required. Tenant-wide Power Automate monitoring using the FlowStudio MCP cached store: failure rates, run-health trends, maker/app inventory, inactive owners, and compliance/health reports. Use only for aggregated tenant views. For one environment, one flow, run control, or root-cause debugging, use flowstudio-power-automate-mcp, flowstudio-power-automate-debug, or the server monitor-flow bundle. Requires FlowStudio for Teams or MCP Pro+.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-session environment retrospective driven by OMC's own instrumentation — trace timelines, friction reports, logs, and plan notepads. Every finding lands on the surface that owns the fix (deterministic check, steering volume, tooling, or information access); nothing is written without user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic architecture survey — walks the module graph and reports ranked deepening candidates (shallow modules, hypothetical seams, logic behind the wrong seam). Survey, not rescue: it finds candidates and hands them to the captain; it never refactors on its own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing-time discipline for the prose an agent speaks to a human (replies, reports, pointers): a protected core never rewritten (code, commands, paths, errors, negators, numbers), filler dies, no narration, auto-clarity where terse misleads

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile one or more OpenViking knowledge bases or document collections into topic-organized, evidence-grounded high-level knowledge, including cross-source findings, trends, changes, drivers, comparisons, implications, and uncertainties. Use with ov compile when the user asks to distill or synthesize a knowledge base, compare multiple collections, or derive higher-order insights such as changes across financial reports; do not use for document-by-document summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build pre-earnings analysis with estimate models, scenario frameworks, and key metrics to watch. Use before a company reports quarterly earnings to prepare positioning notes, set up bull/bear scenarios, and identify what will move the stock. Triggers on "earnings preview", "what to watch for [company] earnings", "pre-earnings", "earnings setup", or "preview Q[X] for [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real DCF (Discounted Cash Flow) model creation for equity valuation. Retrieves financial data from SEC filings and analyst reports, builds comprehensive cash flow projections with proper WACC calculations, performs sensitivity analysis, and outputs professional Excel models with executive summaries. Use when users need to value a company using DCF methodology, request intrinsic value analysis, or ask for detailed financial modeling with growth projections and terminal value calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create professional equity research earnings update reports (8-12 pages, 3,000-5,000 words) analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage. Fast-turnaround format focusing on beat/miss analysis, key metrics, updated estimates, and revised thesis. Includes 1-3 summary tables and 8-12 charts. Use when user requests "earnings update", "quarterly update", "earnings analysis", "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 results", or post-earnings report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive industry and sector landscape reports covering market dynamics, competitive positioning, key players, and thematic trends. Use for client requests, sector initiations, thematic research pieces, or internal knowledge building. Triggers on "sector overview", "industry report", "market landscape", "sector analysis", "industry deep dive", or "thematic research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build institutional-grade comparable company analyses with operating metrics, valuation multiples, and statistical benchmarking in Excel/spreadsheet format. **Perfect for:** - Public company valuation (M&A, investment analysis) - Benchmarking performance vs. industry peers - Pricing IPOs or funding rounds - Identifying valuation outliers (over/under-valued) - Supporting investment committee presentations - Creating sector overview reports **Not ideal for:** - Private companies without comparable public peers - Highly diversified conglomerates - Distressed/bankrupt companies - Pre-revenue startups - Companies with unique business models

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the PROVIDER half of getting a locally running CopilotKit Channels agent to answer in Slack, when no Slack app exists yet — setting up a Channels bot in Slack for the first time, creating the Slack app and its tokens, attaching it to a managed Intelligence Channel, or when a Channel reports setup_required, sits at "Waiting for runtime", the Channel is Online but a Slack mention gets no reply, or a Slack app was built with Socket Mode instead of an Intelligence Request URL. Scoped to an OpenTag checkout, or the OpenTag example inside a channels-sdk clone — the phases assume those conventions (app/channel.tsx, app/env.ts, INTELLIGENCE_CHANNEL_NAME, a local agent on port 8123) and do not describe a project scaffolded by copilotkit init, which already ships its own channel host. If the Slack app and Channel already exist and the question is about declaring or customising the Channel in code, use the copilotkit-channels skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and publish a project status artifact — an opinionated, tabbed status page for a project too big for one update (overview & success criteria, the workstream sequence, next steps, plus background, plan, risks & open questions, and decisions/FAQ when they earn a tab) — published with the built-in Artifact tool to a default-private claude.ai page the user can share with teammates. Use when a piece of work spans several workstreams and you want a shareable overview kept current. Each artifact is backed by a small per-project config in the plugin data dir, so refreshing it re-gathers live state, redeploys the same URL, and reports only the delta. For software projects whose workstreams are PRs, also read swe.md (the X.Y PR-numbering convention; pulling PR state with gh/git; a per-PR detail block). Needs the built-in Artifact tool (claude.ai login). Not for single-PR changes or public docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy Discovery: evidence-gated facade over Alpha Zoo + the SDM strategy store — answers what strategies exist and what state they are in, with per-regime evidence instead of scenario tags; reports evidence freshness on every returned row and rebuilds the disposable evidence cache from local backtest runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy Development Manager: convert academic papers and research reports into validated factors and strategies with automated backtesting, persistent storage, and decay monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。