1.5万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Optional maintainer workflow for the approval, merge-readiness, or authorized self-merge decision on a LoopX pull request. Requires the exact-head review evidence from `loopx pr-review`. Review depth, verdicts, review comments, and the published review format belong to loopx-pr-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amazon product detail page scraper: extract full product data from any open Amazon product detail URL (any /dp/{asin} or /gp/product/{asin} page across all Amazon regional TLDs) — returns asin, url, title, brand, price, listPrice, stars, reviewsCount, starsBreakdown (5/4/3/2/1 star percentages), answeredQuestions, inStock, inStockText, delivery, fastestDelivery, returnPolicy, breadCrumbs, features (bullet points), description, bookDescription, thumbnailImage, highResolutionImages, galleryThumbnails, productOverview (Brand/Model/etc.), attributes (tech spec table), attributesMapped (flat key-value), bestsellerRanks (rank + category + url), variantAttributes (currently selected color/size/style), variantAsins, seller (name + id + url), isAmazonChoice, amazonChoiceText, monthlyPurchaseVolume, hasAPlusContent, hasBrandStory, aiReviewsSummary, reviewsLink, productPageReviews (sample), videosCount, locationText, loadedCountryCode. Works on amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.de, amazon.co.jp, amazon.fr, amazon.it, amazon.es, amazon.ca, amazon.com.au, amazon.in, amazon.com.mx, amazon.com.br, amazon.nl, amazon.se, amazon.sg, amazon.ae, amazon.sa, amazon.pl, amazon.tr, amazon.eg. Use when user mentions Amazon product page, Amazon /dp/, Amazon dp URL, Amazon ASIN scraper, Amazon product detail, Amazon PDP, Amazon product data, Amazon product info, Amazon product fields, Amazon product attributes, Amazon full field extraction, Amazon per-ASIN enrichment, Amazon rating breakdown, Amazon stars breakdown, Amazon bestseller rank, Amazon BSR, Amazon variants, Amazon variant ASINs, Amazon color size options, Amazon feature bullets, Amazon A+ content, Amazon brand story, Amazon AI review summary, Amazon bought in past month, Amazon monthly sales volume, Amazon Amazon's Choice badge, Amazon seller info, scrape Amazon product, enrich Amazon ASIN, Amazon ASIN details, Amazon product review data. Also applies to bulk ASIN enrichment from a list of URLs, competitive product research, brand catalog audits, price and stock monitoring per ASIN, and building a normalized product dataset from a list of Amazon URLs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulates academic peer review, evaluating papers across Originality, Methodology, Results, and Writing to provide Major/Minor Revision recommendations with actionable feedback. Triggers when a user asks to "review my paper," "simulate peer review," or "give my paper a peer review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation. Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation. Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean. Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis, effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review, conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory, thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research, paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Revise an academic paper based on journal referee reports. Reads referee comments from review report or annotated manuscript, then directly modifies main.tex one comment at a time with user approval. Generates response letter after revision. Trigger when user says "referee revise" / "paper-referee-revise" / "审稿意见修改" / "根据审稿人意见修改" / "referee report".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a complete academic literature survey from scratch using multi-agent orchestration. Searches academic databases (OpenAlex, CrossRef, Unpaywall), downloads PDFs, builds BibTeX, drafts a LaTeX review, compiles it, reviews for quality, and revises based on feedback — all automated. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "generate a literature review", "write a survey paper", "review recent papers on [topic]", "create a survey of [field]", "综述", "文献综述", "survey papers in top journals", or wants a multi-agent pipeline to produce a publishable-quality literature review. Also trigger when the user wants to search multiple journals for papers on a topic and synthesize findings into a structured document. Works for any academic field but optimized for economics journals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review oh-my-hermes pull requests that have not been reviewed at their current head commit. Run manually to sweep the open backlog, or pass a number to review one PR. Applies the repository's REVIEW.md policy and posts findings as a GitHub review with inline comments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Wants Jev risk flags on a diff under review: Jev review flags for a diff: auth, tests, migration risk, severity; flags only, never approves a merge. Use when the user says: jev-review-gate, jev review gate, ask jev to review this diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[omh] Recurring operating status and blockers: status, risks, blockers, priorities, and follow-ups. Use when the user says: ops-review, ops review, weekly ops review, status review, operating review, release risks, risks and blockers, priorities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to process, triage, fetch, view, count, list, or resolve review feedback in a GitHub PR. Supports both CodeRabbit and Codex review workflows. In this workflow, “real review feedback” is strictly defined as actionable inline comments; for CodeRabbit, exclude review summaries and nitpicks, and for Codex, exclude review summary cards and use PR main-thread reactions only as status signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a reasoned response rather than compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leverage OpenAI Codex/GPT models for autonomous code implementation, code review, and plan review. Triggers: "codex", "use gpt", "gpt-5", "let openai", "full-auto", "adversarial review", "second opinion review", "用codex", "让gpt实现", "对抗式审查", "让codex审查计划", "第二意见". Use this skill whenever the user wants to delegate coding tasks to OpenAI models, run code or plan reviews via codex, get a second-opinion review from a different model, or execute tasks in a sandboxed environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for local uncommitted changes — this skill only reviews pull requests on GitHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Final code review phase guidance for holistic pre-push review. Use when the user wants code review, final lifecycle review, design alignment checks, integration risk review, or dev-lifecycle phase 9.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews PRs against the live base with immutable objects and three-way merges. Use for PR review/merge readiness, main changed, closed-PR reconsideration, open-PR sweeps, review-led repair, or explicitly requested independent review of your own contribution. Not for GitHub CRUD (use github-ops), authoring/maintaining your PR (use github-contributor), or merging without fresh review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting an ACL author response inside an ACL Rolling Review cycle on OpenReview, covering the response window before meta-review, reviewer discussion dynamics, score-change strategy, flagging review issues to the area chair, anonymity rules, and deciding between responding now versus revising for a later ARR cycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。