403 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Produce the smallest possible code change that fixes a specific, well-scoped issue (CI failure, reviewer comment, typo). Use only when the fix target is explicit. Never refactor unrelated code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify an implementer's diff with an INDEPENDENT, different-vendor sub-agent (diff plus contract only); turn blocking issues into fix-tasks and loop until clean.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify the Omnigent CLI's setup/onboarding flow, terminal UI/UX, and critical user journeys in a completely isolated, reproducible loop. Drives the real `omnigent` binary through a PTY (pexpect) inside a throwaway OMNIGENT_CONFIG_HOME / OMNIGENT_DATA_DIR sandbox that never touches the user's real ~/.omnigent, captures ANSI-stripped frames for UX inspection, and proves a change is verifiable via a before→fix→after baseline diff. Load when developing or reviewing a CLI setup/onboarding/REPL/picker change (omnigent/cli.py, omnigent/onboarding/*, omnigent/repl/*, scripts/install_oss.sh), reproducing a cold-start/first-run UX bug, or confirming a fix actually lands. Several agents can run it concurrently on separate worktrees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build agents and multi-agent systems with the Swarms framework — the Agent class, tools, autonomous loops, memory, and the 15+ multi-agent architectures (SequentialWorkflow, ConcurrentWorkflow, GraphWorkflow, HierarchicalSwarm, SwarmRouter, and more). Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging code that imports `swarms`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Darwin Skill 2.0 (达尔文.skill 2.0): autonomous skill optimizer, v2.0 integrates Microsoft Research SkillLens (arXiv 2605.23899) 9-dim rubric + SkillOpt (arXiv 2605.23904) validation-gated design + human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Evaluates SKILL.md files using a 9-dimension rubric (structure + effectiveness + meta-skill blacklists), runs hill-climbing with git version control, spawns independent judge agents for blind evaluation, validates improvements through test prompts with auto-break on diminishing returns, and generates visual result cards. Use when user mentions "优化skill", "skill评分", "自动优化", "auto optimize", "skill质量检查", "达尔文", "darwin", "帮我改改skill", "skill怎么样", "提升skill质量", "skill review", "skill打分".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever a pull request is opened, reopened, or synchronized in microsoft/apm to assess whether and how the documentation corpus must change to stay truthful with the proposed code change. Activate even when the PR title or body says nothing about docs -- the skill must run on every PR to detect silent drift between code and docs. Classifies impact as no-change, in-place edit (one to a few paragraphs), or structural change (new page or TOC reshape), then orchestrates a CDO + doc-writer + python-architect + editorial-owner + growth-hacker loop to produce a patch-ready advisory. Does NOT review code quality, security, or test coverage. Does NOT auto-merge or auto-push doc edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive Golang coding against accidental bugs — nil panics, typed-nil interfaces, `append` backing-array aliasing, silent int64-to-int32 truncation, float `==` comparison, `defer` inside loops, defensive copies of slices and maps, and usable zero values. Use when a Go program panics on a nil map write or nil pointer dereference, when reviewing code for nil-safety, numeric conversion overflow, or resource lifecycle, or when designing a type whose zero value must be safe. Not for designing concurrent access with goroutines, channels, or sync primitives (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency` skill), not for exploitable vulnerabilities such as injection, weak crypto, or leaked secrets (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill), and not for debugging an already-failing program (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting` skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How the reference commerce agents of either role are structured, covering the loop, where each rule lives, skills, the backend interface, delegates, and model fields. Load when designing or reviewing the structure of a shopping or merchant agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a Stockbee-style setup model book from momentum-burst screener candidates, then update 3-day and 5-day forward outcomes with MFE/MAE, stop-hit status, outcome tags, and cohort statistics. Use when the user wants to study Stockbee Momentum Burst examples, track failed candidates, build setup fluency, review A/B setup quality, or convert screener outputs into a learning loop rather than immediate trade signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete requested work while preventing speculative defenses and scope creep. Use when considering extra hardening, reviewing possible overengineering, resolving repeated verification loops, following explicit task boundaries, or when the user invokes Stop That Shit. Ordinary use of validation, retries, or dependencies alone is not a trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a shipped app that works but feels rough to a product that fits the job, flows without friction, reads clearly, and persuades honestly. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, ux-heuristics, design-everyday-things, refactoring-ui, microinteractions, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, high-perf-browser, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (CUSTOMER.md, DESIGN.md, POSITIONING.md, IMPROVE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a clunky product, cut UX friction, sharpen in-app copy, or says 'the app works but feels rough'. Not for code, tests, or hardening - use improve-code-quality (fresh prototype) or remove-technical-debt (aged); no app yet, create-app; needs growth loops, grow-app; marketing-site friction, improve-website; one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pattern: create or update WordPress block patterns (starter pages, templates, template parts, Query Loop layouts), review pattern registration, block markup, categories, accessibility, or i18n/escaping, or improve pattern design quality. Route custom blocks to wp-block-development; route frontend interactivity to wp-interactivity-api.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for /figure-it-out or 'figure it out'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions. Use for /figure-it-out or 'figure it out'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a new TikZ diagram from the snippet gallery with prevention rules pre-applied (explicit node dimensions, coordinate map, directional edge labels). Compiles standalone, invokes tikz-reviewer with citations from tikz-measurement.md, and loops on revisions until APPROVED.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and prioritize performance work through bounded-work and forward-progress checks. Use when asked to find performance issues, investigate freezes/500s/OOMs, review retries or polling for no-progress loops, rank a performance backlog, or implement the next simple performance fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specify plant models for closed-loop simulation: system specs, architecture, build plans, validation plans. Use when creating, updating, or reviewing plant model specifications, planning plant model architecture, or planning plant model validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, build and quality-check a premium short commercial for a real business (roofing, property, ecommerce, B2B software) using AI-generated footage, code-built motion (HTML/GSAP), selective Three.js and an independent-critic "Gauntlet" loop. Use when asked to make a launch-style / SaaS-style video, business ad, explainer, sample reel or pitch video, or to review and improve one. Encodes motion principles distilled from 28 professional launch films, a quality bar, audio rules and a business-offer playbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an agent's context layout against the four places: system prompt, tools, history, tail. Use when the user asks to audit, review or fix their agent's context, prompt caching, token spend per turn, or CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md layout. Read-only: reports findings and a fix list, changes nothing. Do NOT use for writing evals (evals-bootstrap) or for loop design (goal-test).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with render_game_to_text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design critique with 7 rated passes: Information Architecture, Interaction State Coverage, User Journey and Emotional Arc, AI Slop Risk (10-item blacklist), Design System Alignment, Responsive and Accessibility, Unresolved Decisions. Each rated 0-10 with gap-fill loop. Parallel cross-model design voices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。