「rspec」の検索結果

Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enables cross-model dialogue between Claude and Gemini with shared visual memory. Use when the user wants to generate images, have visual dialogues with AI, create scientific illustrations with continuity, or have multiple AI perspectives respond to the same prompt. Key trigger phrases: "generate an image", "visual dialogue", "ask the daimones", "resonance field", "Minoan tarot", "cross-model", "KV cache", "MESSAGE TO NEXT FRAME".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate physically-based atmospheric scattering shaders — sky domes, planetary atmospheres, LUT-optimized pipelines, depth-aware post-processing. Four modes — sky-dome, atmosphere-post, planet, lut. Triggers on atmospheric scattering, sky shader, sunset rendering, planet atmosphere, Rayleigh scattering, Mie scattering, volumetric sky, sky dome, atmosphere post-processing, aerial perspective, transmittance LUT, sky rendering, realistic sky, planetary rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing vault structure, finding orphan notes, discovering missing connections, identifying bridge concepts, or checking vault health from a graph perspective. Triggers on "vault graph", "map vault", "find orphans", "missing links", "vault structure", "knowledge graph".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured insect behavior observations using sampling protocols, ethogram categories, event recording, interaction logging, environmental context, and summary analysis. Covers focal animal sampling, scan sampling, all-occurrences sampling, and instantaneous sampling methods. Defines a standard insect ethogram with locomotion, feeding, grooming, mating, defense, communication, and rest categories. Includes timestamped event recording, intraspecific and interspecific interaction logging, environmental covariate documentation, and time budget analysis. Use when studying insect behavior for ecological research, documenting behavioral repertoires for a species, observing pollinator activity or predator-prey dynamics, or supporting conservation assessments with behavioral data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Form a coherent gestalt — the whole that is more than the sum of its parts — from the panoramic perception produced by expand-awareness. Maps tensions and resonances between domains, identifies the emergent figure from the ground of multiple perspectives, tests the candidate whole for premature closure, and articulates the insight in a single sentence no single domain could have produced. Use after expand-awareness has surfaced raw multi-domain perception and before express-insight communicates the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference Hildegard von Bingen's Physica natural history knowledge. Covers classification of plants, stones, animals, fish, birds, elements, and trees with their medicinal, symbolic, and practical properties. Enables cross- referencing between categories and application guidance. Use when exploring a specific plant, stone, or animal from Hildegard's perspective, researching medieval natural history and cosmology, cross-referencing properties across categories, or integrating Physica knowledge into health, spiritual, or creative practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn in vitro potency and animal pharmacokinetics into a defensible human dose projection — the arithmetic that decides whether a compound can reach its target concentration safely. Use this skill for non-compartmental analysis of a concentration-time profile (AUC, Cmax, terminal half-life, clearance, volume of distribution), one- and two-compartment simulation of a dosing regimen, interspecies allometric scaling, human-equivalent dose conversion by body surface area, and the exposure margin between a projected therapeutic concentration and a toxicology no-effect level. Also trigger on non-compartmental analysis, AUC, clearance, volume of distribution, allometric scaling, human equivalent dose, first-in-human, NOAEL, therapeutic index, or exposure margin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an answer is wanted from one named seat only: breaking, business, career, codebase, human, impact, innovation, moat, rent-seeking, skeptic, or stability. Not for multi-lens synthesis: use prism. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route NowStack Mobile UI work to the right design/build skill while enforcing a clear, user-first UX bar. Use for any "build/design/redesign/polish the UI" request on the mobile app, web app, landing, or admin — when the surface or the right skill is underspecified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route NowStack Mobile Convex work to the right skill. Use for underspecified Convex backend, schema, auth, migration, performance, component, or env tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要将产品/服务/个人的特点转化为对受众有吸引力的利益点时调用。 适用于：写产品文案不知从何下笔、准备销售话术、撰写简历或自我介绍、 做产品定位思考。核心信号：用户在列举产品特点但不清楚"别人为什么要在乎"。 不适用于：纯技术文档、产品规格说明（此时特色本身就是目的）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X/Twitter public sentiment research. Searches X for real-time perspectives, market sentiment, expert opinions, breaking news, and community discourse. Use when: user asks "what are people saying about", "X/Twitter sentiment", "check X for", "search twitter for", "what's CT saying about", or wants public opinion on a stock, sector, company, or market event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Codex AI for implementation, analysis, and alternative solutions. Use when you need a second AI perspective, want to explore different approaches, or need specialized Codex capabilities for complex coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered multi-agent code review. Simulates a team of Principal Engineers reviewing code from different perspectives. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, analyze changes, or perform code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply phenomenological methods including bracketing (epoche), lived experience inquiry, and Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to uncover the essence of human experience. Use this skill when the user needs to study how people experience a phenomenon from the first-person perspective, apply Husserlian descriptive or Heideggerian interpretive phenomenology, conduct IPA with idiographic focus, or when they ask 'what is the lived experience of X', 'how do I bracket my assumptions', or 'how do I do IPA'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。