「safety」の検索結果

Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source-control safety for Git. Two rules apply whether or not you read the body. First, never commit, amend, push, tag, rebase, cherry-pick, revert, or reset --hard unless the user asked for that exact write in this session. An explicit request to create a new commit counts anywhere in the user's own task text, but it is not a request to amend, push, or tag. Finishing a task without that request is not authorization, so leave your work uncommitted for review. Second, when a Git lock file or corrupt index blocks you, never kill the holding process or bulldoze through with deletions - wait, retry, use the holder's own stop mechanism, or stop and report. Load the body only before writing Git history or recovering Git state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an Agent Skill bundle for structural integrity, trigger quality, artifact improvement, script correctness, safety, installed-tree integrity, and target-host portability before release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skill-requested filesystem, command, network, secret, or destructive action against an explicit sandbox policy without executing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code against project standards. Checks for missing tests, dead code, type safety, lint issues, and coding conventions. Run after completing any implementation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develops and reviews PyLabRobot lab-automation resources, liquid-handling plans, offline simulations, and supported-device integrations. Supports PyLabRobot protocols and API questions; keep physical execution behind an explicit operator safety gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, configures, inspects, restarts, and analyzes bounded FluidSim computational-fluid-dynamics simulations with explicit numerical-validity and HPC safety checks. Use for FluidSim solver selection, parameter review, FFT/MPI setup, output diagnostics, or restart compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design spec with 98 rules for building CLI tools that AI agents can safely use. Covers structured JSON output, error handling, input contracts, safety guardrails, exit codes, and agent self-description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI code generation safety guardrail register: static AST analysis, forbidden import filters, and zero-day vulnerability checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official CCXT MCP (Model Context Protocol) server — connect an AI agent to 100+ cryptocurrency exchanges and prediction markets for market data, balances, and opt-in trading. Covers installing the server in Claude Desktop/Code, Cursor, VS Code and other MCP hosts; configuring named accounts and API keys (kept local, never seen by the model); the capability tiers and safety rails; sandbox/testnet trading; and how to drive the tools. Use when the user wants an agent to fetch prices/order books/candles, check balances/orders/positions, place or cancel orders, or explore prediction markets across exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hands-on workshop — the learner works through the course instead of watching it, with an exercise or a check every couple of pages, short slides that only set up the next task, guiding narration that asks more than it tells, and a closing page where the pieces come together in one small project. Use when the ask is a workshop, a bootcamp session, 「动手」「实操」「练中学」「边做边学」, or a skill the learner is meant to leave holding; also use when the user names this style. Not for a systematic explanatory course (that is `lecture-style`) and not for occupational procedure training with tools and safety gates (that is `vocational`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vocational / technical training courses. Plans the course as a hands-on work task with an operation flow, tool and equipment state, safety boundaries and GO/STOP judgements, instead of a concept lecture. Use when the requirement names a real occupational task, a piece of equipment, a clinical or industrial procedure, or a certification skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement memory-safe programming with RAII, ownership, smart pointers, and resource management across Rust, C++, and C. Use when writing safe systems code, managing resources, or preventing memory bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master defensive Bash programming techniques for production-grade scripts. Use when writing robust shell scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or system utilities requiring fault tolerance and safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a systematic diagnostic scan of an AI workflow across 5 quality dimensions — prompt quality, context efficiency, tool health, architecture fitness, and safety — producing a scored report with prioritized remediation actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two related workflows for a locally-cloned codebase, in one skill. Documentation mode produces a single, comprehensive, verifiable architecture document primarily by reading files on disk (local-first) — use it whenever the user wants to understand, map, document, research, or onboard onto a codebase ("research this repo", "write up the architecture", "do an architecture deep dive", "document how this codebase works", "map the system design", "create an onboarding doc"). Modernization mode generates a phased plan to modernize, migrate, upgrade, or rewrite a legacy system ("modernize this", "plan the migration", "how would we rewrite this", "how do we get off this legacy stack"); if no architecture document exists yet it first runs Documentation mode, then continues straight through to the plan. It assumes the legacy stack may be dead, runs a time-boxed feasibility spike, and picks the highest achievable rung on a safety ladder instead of demanding a fully-green legacy CI gate up front.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find, evaluate, and assemble the smallest compatible set of AI Agent Skills for an end-to-end natural-language goal. Use when a user wants Skills for a multi-step workflow, asks which Skills fit a project, needs an installed-Skill audit or conflict check, has low Skill recall, wants indirect helpers such as humanizers or compliance checks, or wants a project-specific Skill Stack with controlled installation. Search local Skills, registries, GitHub, and OpenCLI; compare adoption, verified fit, safety, and overlap. Do not use for locating one known or common Skill; use the generic find-skills workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。