「sec」の検索結果

Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem storage, and evaluating runtime behavior. Activates for requests involving iOS security testing, Objection runtime analysis, Frida-based iOS assessment, or mobile runtime exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-production security checklist for Agentforce deployments: permission scope, data exposure, authentication, logging. NOT for general Salesforce security review (see security-health-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply Java secure coding best practices — including validating untrusted inputs, defending against injection attacks with parameterized queries, minimizing attack surface via least privilege, applying strong cryptographic algorithms, handling exceptions securely without exposing sensitive data, managing secrets at runtime, avoiding unsafe deserialization, and encoding output to prevent XSS. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for secure coding. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits security and supply-chain risk between two git refs with Codex cross-validation. 预发布安全审计（含 Codex 交叉验证）。Use when performing pre-release security audits, supply-chain reviews, or comparing two git refs for security regressions. Triggers on “预发布审计”, “security audit”, “release audit”, “安全预审”.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multiple Reforge-guided section-refactor lanes in parallel, each in its own worktree/branch off origin/main, with a score-blind adversarial review panel gating every commit, one draft PR per section. Use when the user wants to reduce Reforge surface/internal score across several sections at once via architecturally-correct deletions (dead surface, entity-leak removal, cross-section read-splits) — not by relocation, parameter bags, or accessibility-dodging. Wraps the per-lane process in .codex/skills/humans-refactor. Triggers: 'refactor swarm', 'parallel section refactors', 'run reforge refactor on Users/Tickets/...', 'burn down surface score across sections'. Has an intensity dial (light|standard|deep) and a workflow|solo execution mode to trade token burn against autonomy per unit of output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit orchestrator for agent skills — scans for prompt injection, data exfiltration, credential theft, supply chain risks, and instruction hierarchy violations before any skill is installed, created, improved, or read from a GitHub repo. Load when creating skills from external sources, when improve-skills reads from GitHub repos, when research-skill fetches community SKILL.md files, when a user installs a third-party skill, or when the user asks to audit skill security, scan for injection, check if a skill is safe, scan all skills, or run a security sweep. Orchestrates all secure-* skills in sequence. Content is SAFE only if ALL secure-* skills return SAFE. 36% of community skills contain flaws (Snyk ToxicSkills 2026). This skill is the first line of defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Use when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go), and not for general debugging or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit codebases, infrastructure, AND agentic AI systems for security issues. Covers traditional security (dependencies, secrets, OWASP web top 10, SSL/TLS, file permissions) PLUS agentic security (prompt injection scanning, identity spoofing detection, memory poisoning checks, multi-agent communication audit, OWASP Agentic Top 10). Use when scanning for vulnerabilities, detecting hardcoded secrets, reviewing agent workspace configuration, checking prompt injection vectors, or auditing agent permissions and boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure mobile coding practices specializing in input validation, WebView security, and mobile-specific security patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for mobile security implementations or mobile security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handling secrets, keys and credentials for site-os — reading vigyan-secrets.md safely, moving keys into app_secrets, rotating, and responding to an exposure. Use whenever a task touches a key, token, password, .env file, app_secrets, encryption, or the secrets document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and exploits insecure local data storage vulnerabilities in Android and iOS mobile applications including unencrypted databases, world-readable files, insecure SharedPreferences, plaintext credential storage, and improper keychain/keystore usage. Use when performing mobile penetration testing focused on OWASP M9 (Insecure Data Storage) or assessing compliance with MASVS-STORAGE requirements. Activates for requests involving mobile data storage security, local storage exploitation, SharedPreferences analysis, or mobile data leakage assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auditing Terraform infrastructure-as-code for security misconfigurations using Checkov, tfsec, Terrascan, and OPA/Rego policies to detect overly permissive IAM policies, public resource exposure, missing encryption, and insecure defaults before cloud deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes UEFI bootkit persistence mechanisms including firmware implants in SPI flash, EFI System Partition (ESP) modifications, Secure Boot bypass techniques, and UEFI variable manipulation. Covers detection of known bootkit families (BlackLotus, LoJax, MosaicRegressor, MoonBounce, CosmicStrand), ESP partition forensic inspection, chipsec-based firmware integrity verification, and Secure Boot configuration auditing. Activates for requests involving UEFI malware analysis, firmware persistence investigation, boot chain integrity verification, or Secure Boot bypass detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem storage, and evaluating runtime behavior. Activates for requests involving iOS security testing, Objection runtime analysis, Frida-based iOS assessment, or mobile runtime exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの脆弱性報告を、公開済みのバージョンと信頼範囲の根拠で確認し、終了・継続・影響の絞り込みを判断して、管理者向けの返信案をまとめます。

• OpenClawの脆弱性報告を判断したいとき
• 公開版に不具合が残るか確認したいとき
• 既存の勧告との重複を調べたいとき

Run full security scans on the codebase using Ruflo security tools. Use when reviewing PRs for security regressions, auditing auth/input-handling code, before production deploys, or when the user asks for a security check at quick/standard/deep depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the implementation source code of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, clients, and tool handlers against a security baseline — authentication, sessions, rate limiting, input-schema validation, official-SDK usage, RCE vectors, and the OWASP MCP Top 10 — producing a report with file/line evidence. Use this skill when: - Reviewing an MCP server implementation for security before release - Checking a server against the baseline controls (MCP-01 to MCP-05) and the OWASP MCP Top 10 - Auditing tools for RCE vectors (command/code injection, unsafe deserialization, path traversal, SSTI, dependency hijacking, SSRF) - Verifying auth, session, rate-limiting, and input-validation controls on a network-exposed server - Reviewing MCP client code that handles untrusted server responses and session IDs - Requests like "review this MCP server for security" or "is my MCP server implementation secure?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for configuring and managing GitHub Dependabot. Use this skill when users ask about creating or optimizing dependabot.yml files, managing Dependabot pull requests, configuring dependency update strategies, setting up grouped updates, monorepo patterns, multi-ecosystem groups, security update configuration, auto-triage rules, or any GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) supply chain security topic related to Dependabot. For pre-commit dependency vulnerability scanning in AI coding agents via the GitHub MCP Server, this skill references the Advanced Security plugin (`advanced-security@copilot-plugins`). Use this skill when an agent needs to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive industry and sector landscape reports covering market dynamics, competitive positioning, key players, and thematic trends. Use for client requests, sector initiations, thematic research pieces, or internal knowledge building. Triggers on "sector overview", "industry report", "market landscape", "sector analysis", "industry deep dive", or "thematic research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Security: scan the codebase (the whole repository or a scoped part of it), scan changes (this branch's or a pull request's diff, or one commit), or suggest patches (findings turned into targeted patch files, each verified by a panel of agents, that you apply when you choose). Use when the user asks to scan, audit or check code with Claude Security, to scan their changes with Claude Security, or to fix or patch Claude Security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。