「trace」の検索結果

AIエージェントの不調を、指示・記憶・ツール実行・画面表示など12の層から調べるスキル。コードやログを根拠に原因を整理し、重要度順の指摘と修正案をまとめます。

• アプリ内だけで起きる不調を調べたいとき
• 過去の会話が混ざる原因を調査
• ツールの未実行や実行の誤報を確認

GitHubの公開ソフトウェアに不正な変更がないか、履歴やアーカイブを照合して調査します。削除された情報の回収を試み、侵害の手がかりと根拠付きの報告書をまとめます。

• 不審なコミットやビルド手順の調査
• 履歴から消えたコミットの回収調査
• 認証情報の漏えい経緯を調べたいとき

Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where LLM spend goes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve strategic UN Comtrade commodity flows with anomaly flags. Use when the user asks who trades a critical commodity, which flows changed sharply, or how trade exposure is shifting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve Archify diagram accuracy, visual quality and complete authoring speed with fewer repairs. Use for generation experiments or evaluating changes to layout, routing, diagnostics, authoring instructions and acceptance rules against actual diagrams and agent traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why a GAIA question failed — extract trace, classify failure mode, and propose a fix. Use when a GAIA benchmark run reports a failed/incorrect task_id and you need to root-cause it before resubmitting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open a named, traced browser session into an RVF cognitive container with a ruvector trajectory recording every action

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drives a real browser through the omowright library from the js eval kernel: sites the user is already signed into, forms and clicks, JS-rendered pages, screenshots, web QA, extension popups, a human handoff for login, CAPTCHA or OTP, and a browser you own for scraping, bot-scored targets, network capture and QA traces. Use for any interactive browser task; not for a plain search or an unblocked static fetch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Windows-first CLI harness for Nsight Graphics capture, GPU Trace summary, and ngfx-replay analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formats and structurally validates local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits PCR and RT-qPCR primers with Primer3, explicit thermodynamic conditions, reference-based off-target amplification searches, and traceable sequence coordinates. Use for designing primer pairs, checking existing primers, exon-junction or isoform-specific assays, variant masking, cloning tails, multiplex compatibility, and interpreting Primer-BLAST results. Includes bounded local in-silico PCR and BLAST screening; distinguishes computational candidates from experimentally validated assays.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides qualitative-first, evidence-traceable developmental review of scholarly works and audit low-stakes research-assessment rubrics with optional local quality controls. Never use for ranking people or consequential decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds evidence-traceable market research reports and assumption-driven market sizing or forecast scenarios. Use for market definition, industry and customer evidence, competitive landscapes, TAM/SAM/SOM reconciliation, forecast sensitivity, and auditable report scaffolds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares and structurally reviews readiness evidence for ISO management-system and laboratory-competence standards - ISO 13485 medical device QMS, ISO 14971 device risk management, ISO/IEC 17025 testing and calibration laboratories, and ISO 15189 medical laboratories. Use when organizing declared scope, controlled documents, risk-management files, scope of accreditation, traceability, CAPA, external-provider controls, or bounded local evidence manifests, and when separating ISO certification from laboratory accreditation, FDA QMSR inspection, CLIA certification, MDSAP, and EU MDR/IVDR evidence boundaries. Not for legal applicability, compliance, certification, or accreditation decisions; contains no clause text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares and validates research-only clinical decision-support evaluation, evidence-profile, cohort, survival, biomarker/model, privacy, and governance artifacts. Supports aggregate or synthetic research documentation and traceability, excluding patient care and live clinical operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when querying or extending GitNexus's PDG control/data-dependence surface (the `pdg_query` MCP tool, CDG/REACHING_DEF edges), or reasoning about "what controls X" / "where does Y flow" / guard clauses. Examples: "what guards this statement?", "trace this variable within the function", "why is the pdg_query result empty?", "add a CDG query".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct workflow behind a past coding-agent artifact using local ax sessions/commits/skills/tool traces. Use when asked how X was built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSRF reachability, internal route probing, metadata-service access, credential pivoting, and token-to-accepted-privilege chains. Use when the user asks to trace SSRF sources, internal hosts, metadata endpoints, link-local tokens, service-account credentials, or explain how a server-side fetch edge turns into accepted access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。