「trust」の検索結果

Hunt CI/CD pipeline vulnerabilities — GitHub Actions workflow injection (pull_request_target Pwnrequest + ${{ }}-into-shell), self-hosted runner poisoning, OIDC trust-policy abuse, Jenkins script-console RCE and CVE-2024-23897 file read, GitLab CI runner-token registration, Terraform state file leakage, artifact/log secret leakage, pipeline env-var disclosure. Use when target has a public GitHub/GitLab org, exposed CI dashboards (Jenkins/TeamCity/Drone/Argo), or build artifacts/images are reachable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt CORS Misconfiguration — origin-reflection with credentials, null-origin trust, subdomain-regex bypass (unanchored vs unescaped-dot vs prefix-only), pre-flight (OPTIONS) gating bypass, postMessage origin checks. High only when an attacker-controlled origin can perform a CREDENTIALED cross-origin read of sensitive data and you have proven it in a browser. Use when testing API endpoints, SPAs, or any app emitting Access-Control-* headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for business logic vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports. Covers coupon-race-stacking (Instacart, Stripe, Reverb), negative-quantity-in-cart price tampering (Upserve, Eternal/Zomato), decimal/fraction price-field overflow (Shipt), client-side checkout amount trust on PayPal redirect (WordPress.org), price-per-unit mass-assignment (Krisp), and archived-price swap / cart-TOCTOU (Stripe). Use when hunting business logic — heavy emphasis on financial-impact-demonstrated cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRO analysis for landing pages evaluating headline clarity, CTA placement, trust signals, mobile friction, and conversion killers. Use when uploading a landing page screenshot, pasting a URL for review, requesting conversion rate optimization feedback, or auditing page effectiveness prioritized by impact. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any task the organization may already have an approved skill, prompt, MCP server, or Agent for: reviewing code, a commit, a diff, or a pull request; writing tests or documentation; querying a database, API, or service; automating a browser or web page; running untrusted code; connecting to a SaaS tool; drafting, researching, or any other substantive work. The user will not mention Observal: the task type is the trigger. Check what is already installed, then run observal discover search as the first action, before reading the repository or working from scratch. Also use when the user wants to log in, configure Observal, inspect local harness setup, share or open a repository Agent share, manage a teamspace or invitation, process inbox items, check installed registry items, or call an endpoint without a dedicated command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

URL validation and content sanitization for untrusted sources — use when handling external input safely

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research online purchases, prices, and shop trust. Use for buying advice, subscriptions, or shopping photos, links, and checkout screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, validate, publish, update, inspect, query, roll back, or archive a dynamic Marina applet. Use for Artifact+-style web apps that should run behind Marina authentication, carry small bundled assets or data, use an applet-owned Postgres schema, or add a trusted Python ASGI backend without a Marina image deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically trace Claude Code conversations to Braintrust for observability. Captures sessions, conversation turns, and tool calls as hierarchical traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized CORS misconfiguration testing, including reflected origins, null origins, subdomain trust, and credential exposure. Use when a task belongs to the CORS testing domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that a watermark-removal or "humanizer" step actually removed a statistical text watermark, by measuring a sample whose key the user holds. Use after any tool, script or service claims to have cleaned a text, or when the user asks whether such a tool works, which one to trust, or how to test one. Reports a detector score against fixed thresholds plus what the run cost in meaning, facts, verbatim overlap and length. This skill only measures and never removes a mark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only to generate or update a governance skill card for a specified existing agent skill directory. Do not use for explaining, listing, comparing, or discussing skill capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PLAINTEXT-ONLY: the shipped `doca_flow_grpc` server uses `grpc::InsecureServerCredentials()` with NO TLS / mTLS / token-auth knob on the binary — transport security must come from external infrastructure (e.g. an mTLS proxy / sidecar) on a trusted segment. Use this skill when bringing up, configuring, hardening, or debugging `doca_flow_grpc` — the DOCA-shipped gRPC remote-control surface in front of `doca-flow` that lets non-C++ clients (Python, Go, Rust, Java) program Flow pipes and entries over RPC instead of linking `libdoca_flow.so` directly. Trigger even when the user doesn't say 'doca-flow-grpc-server' or 'gRPC' — e.g. 'program Flow rules from Python on another host', 'remotely configure pipes on the BlueField', 'client times out connecting to the Flow server', 'where is the .proto for Flow', 'UNAUTHENTICATED / FAILED_PRECONDITION on a Flow RPC'. Route elsewhere for the underlying doca-flow API, generic gRPC tooling (protoc, language bindings), or DOCA install / BFB bring-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user is doing hands-on DOCA programming on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC and needs the foundation primitives every per-library context rests on — walking the doca_ctx lifecycle, discovering doca_dev / doca_devinfo and gating on doca_*_cap_* before trusting a feature, wiring doca_mmap / doca_buf_inventory / doca_buf for zero-copy I/O across libraries, driving doca_pe for completions, or DOCA Log's two-tier (--sdk-log-level vs app-side) model. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA Common" — typical implicit phrasings include "my tasks submit but nothing completes", "DOCA_ERROR_BAD_STATE from doca_ctx_start", "--sdk-log-level does nothing for my DOCA_LOG_DBG lines", "share a buf between doca_dma and doca_rdma", or "crashes far from the offending line". Refuse and route elsewhere for per-library questions in isolation (load doca-flow / doca-rdma / doca-eth alongside), installing DOCA (doca-setup), or doc lookup (doca-public-knowledge-map).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Attack paths into an operated system: turn a system's components and data flows into assets, trust boundaries, attack scenarios, controls, and the security test that proves each control holds. Use when the user says: application-threat-model, application threat model, threat model, threat modeling, threat modelling, threat modeling session, threat modeling workshop, security threat model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crabbox/Testbox remote proof: portable provider routing, untrusted isolation, Linux/macOS/Windows/WSL2, live E2E, diagnostics, cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversion-focused design that removes friction and guides users toward action through clarity, trust, and speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polished, business-ready design with modern typography, structured layouts, and a trustworthy visual identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, configure, troubleshoot, or review Cloudflare One Zero Trust and SASE deployments. Use cloudflare-one-migrations for migration planning from other vendors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Index of trusted GJC SDK reference guides (broker, session CLI, embedding, app development). Advisory only: read these documents for background; there is no guide to execute and no workflow skill to run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。