「hn」の検索結果

Expert-level molecular biology knowledge. Use when working with DNA replication, transcription, translation, gene regulation, cloning, PCR, sequencing, CRISPR, epigenetics, or molecular techniques. Also use when the user mentions 'DNA replication', 'transcription', 'translation', 'gene expression', 'PCR', 'cloning', 'restriction enzyme', 'gel electrophoresis', 'Western blot', 'CRISPR', 'epigenetics', 'promoter', 'enhancer', or 'RNA splicing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level cell biology knowledge. Use when working with cell structure, organelles, cell signaling, cell cycle, cell division, cytoskeleton, membrane biology, vesicular trafficking, apoptosis, or cell biology techniques. Also use when the user mentions 'organelle', 'mitochondria', 'endoplasmic reticulum', 'Golgi', 'cytoskeleton', 'cell cycle', 'mitosis', 'meiosis', 'apoptosis', 'signal transduction', 'membrane potential', 'endocytosis', or 'cell migration'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frontend UI design, critique, audit, polish. Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System architect and technical design leader. Use when the user asks to talk to Winston or requests the architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate interactive brainstorming sessions using diverse creative techniques and ideation methods. Use when the user says help me brainstorm or help me ideate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product manager for PRD creation and requirements discovery. Use when the user asks to talk to John or requests the product manager.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical documentation specialist and knowledge curator. Use when the user asks to talk to Paige or requests the tech writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create architecture solution design decisions for AI agent consistency. Use when the user says "lets create architecture" or "create technical architecture" or "create a solution design"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every progress update, status report, problem explanation, ETA, review, acceptance, or completion report to the operator/owner, especially when they ask “到哪了”, “什么问题”, “做了什么”, “结果呢”, “还要多久”, or “说人话”. Translate technical evidence into visible or operational outcomes before details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when selecting serialisation formats and contracts for APIs, messaging, caching, or persistence. Keywords: serialisation, System.Text.Json, source generator, protobuf, messagepack, wire compatibility, AOT.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to inspect NuGet package APIs, list public types, or decompile method/property signatures. Keywords: inspect package API, list types, decompile type, method signatures, NuGet interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a phase-gated refactoring or redesign loop - session-blind workers map and trace the area, empirical probes precede the design, an approval gate guards implementation, and a conformance audit re-checks the branch after any design change. State persists in .episteme/DESIGN-<slug>.md. Requires the refactor agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: refactor loop, redesign, design gate, enumerate before design, conformance audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice compatibility, downstream break, compatible PR, blast radius review, api compatibility, contract break, dto shape change, endpoint break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing PRs/diffs/branches/documents for .NET quality, correctness, performance, security, data access, messaging, and observability. Includes adversarial critical-thinking mode for skeptical/cynical review requests. Keywords: code review, review PR, review diff, critical review, cynical review, adversarial review, production readiness, low GC, AOT, security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need blast-radius analysis, dependency graphs, cross-repo impact, breaking-change diff, or architectural overview of .NET workspaces. Keywords: blast radius, dependency graph, impact analysis, cross-repo, call graph, endpoint map, EF Core lineage, breaking change, daemon, reindex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing .NET concurrency patterns for async I/O, queues, pipelines, or thread safety. Keywords: async/await, channels, dataflow, Rx, lock contention, producer consumer, parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need CRAP score and coverage risk analysis to find high-risk code before refactoring or release. Keywords: CRAP score, risk hotspots, cyclomatic complexity, test coverage gaps, coverage threshold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing types and collections for hot paths and low-allocation .NET code. Keywords: readonly struct, sealed class, ValueTask, Span, FrozenDictionary, FrozenSet, allocation optimisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or changing public C#/.NET APIs with compatibility and versioning constraints. Keywords: breaking change, API design, backward compatibility, binary compatibility, deprecation strategy, versioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or refactoring modern C# with maintainability and performance standards. Keywords: coding standards, C# best practices, refactor C#, records, pattern matching, async best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。